Advertisement

Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 113–118 | Cite as

Nancy E. Dowd and Michelle S. Jacobs (eds.), Feminist Legal Theory: an Anti-Essentialist Reader; Wendy McElroy (ed.), Liberty for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the Twenty-First Century

  • Christine Jesseman
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bartlett, K.T., “Feminist Legal Methods”, Harvard Law Review 103 (1990), 829–888.Google Scholar
  2. Dworkin, A., Pornography: Men Possessing Women (London: Women's Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  3. Forna, A., “Pornography and Racism: Sexualizing Oppression and Inciting Hatred”, in Pornography: Women, Violence and Civil Liberties, ed. C. Itzin (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 102–112.Google Scholar
  4. Gunning, I., “Arrogant Perception, World-Travelling and Multicultural Feminism: The Case of Female Genital Surgeries”, Columbia Human Rights Law Review 23 (1992), 189–248.Google Scholar
  5. Hooks, B., Black Looks: Race and Representation (Boston: South End Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  6. Jones, K.B., “The Trouble with Authority”, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 3/1 (1991), 104–127.Google Scholar
  7. Kennedy, D., “The International Human RightsMovement: Part of the Problem”, European Human Rights Law Review 3 (2001), 245–267.Google Scholar
  8. Nesia, V., “Toward a Feminist Internationality: A Critique of U.S. Feminist Legal Scholarship”, Harvard Women's Law Journal 16 (1993), 189–210.Google Scholar
  9. Smart, C., Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar
  10. Wright, S., “The Individual in International Human Rights: Quebec, Canada and the Nation-State”, Saskatchewan Law Review 59 (1995), 437–469.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Jesseman
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations