Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Pretty Fine Line: Life, Death, Autonomy and Letting it B

  • Note
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cases of Diane Pretty and Ms B. raise crucial issues about decision-making and autonomy at the end of life. Ms B. was permitted her wish to die rather than live permanently dependent upon a ventilator because her case was constructed as one about withholding consent to medical treatment, which every adult with capacity has a right to do. Mrs Pretty, however, sought active intervention to end her life. Requiring assistance to die, and claiming that this was her human right, she sought an assurance that her husband would not be prosecuted if he helped her. Her claim was rejected and the assurance refused. The cases prompt questions about the nature of autonomy, the influence of others and the different way sin which medical and legal decisions are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Beauchamp, T. & Childress, J., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert-Smith, D. & O'Doherty, S., “Legislative Technique and Human Rights: A Response”, Crim L.R. (2003), 384–390.

  • Donchin, A., “Autonomy, Interdependence and Assisted Suicide: Respecting Boundaries/Crossing Lines”, Bioethics 14 (2002), 187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C., “Pretty's Legal Battle for Dignity in Death”, The Guardian, 13 May 2002.

  • Frazer, E., Hornsby, J. & Lovibond, S., Ethics: A Feminist Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C., In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V., Feminist Morality (London: University of Chicago Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tur, R., “Legislative Technique and Human Rights: The Sad Case of Assisted Suicide”, Crim L. R. (2003), 3–12.

  • Voluntary Euthanasia Society, Diane Pretty Has Died, http://www.ves.org.uk/newsstory.php?id=310, 12 May 2002.

  • Ward, D., “Police Clear Widow of Man Who Took Lethal Dose in Swiss Clinic”, The Guardian, 10 April 2003.

  • Wells, C., “Patients, Consent and Criminal Law”, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 1 (1994), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, A., Sacrificial Logics (London: Routledge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kent Law School, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NS, UK

    Hazel Biggs

Authors
  1. Hazel Biggs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biggs, H. A Pretty Fine Line: Life, Death, Autonomy and Letting it B. Feminist Legal Studies 11, 291–301 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000004702.07083.f6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000004702.07083.f6

Search

Navigation