Skip to main content

Global impact of mutation-derived varieties

Abstract

During the past seventy years, worldwide more than 2250 varieties have been released that have been derived either as direct mutants or from their progenies. Induction of mutations with radiation has been the most frequently used method for directly developed mutant varieties. The prime strategy in mutation-based breeding has been to upgrade the well-adapted plant varieties by altering one or two major traits, which limit their productivity or enhance their quality value. In this paper, the global impact of mutation-derived varieties on food production and quality enhancement is presented. In addition, the economic contribution of the selected mutant varieties of rice, barley, cotton, groundnut, pulses, sunflower, rapeseed and Japanese pear is discussed. In several mutation-derived varieties, the changed traits have resulted in synergistic effect on increasing the yield and quality of the crop, improving agronomic inputs, crop rotation, and consumer acceptance. In contrast to the currently protected plant varieties or germplasm and increasing restrictions on their use, the induced mutants have been freely available for plant breeding. Many mutants have made transnational impact on increasing yield and quality of several seed-propagated crops. Induced mutations will continue to have an increasing role in creating crop varieties with traits such as modified oil, protein and starch quality, enhanced uptake of specific metals, deeper rooting system, and resistance to drought, diseases and salinity as a major component of the environmentally sustainable agriculture. Future research on induced mutations would also be important in the functional genomics of many food crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 1999. Oilseeds sector pro-file. Grain and Oilseeds Division, Agriculature and Agri-Food Canada, Ontario. http://atn-riae.agr.ca/public/htmldocs/e1919.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahloowalia, B.S. & M. Maluszynski, 2001. Induced mutations-a new paradigm in plant breeding. Euphytica 118: 167–173.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amano, E., 2001. Report Special Committee on Evaluation of Economics for Utilization of Radiation. Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) 1233 Satanic Takasaki Gunma-ken.

  4. Anonymous, 1996. Bureau of Economic and Agricultural Statistics, Bangkok, Thailand.

  5. Anonymous, 2000. Economic scale of utilization of radiation in Japan. Science and Technology Agency, Japan.

  6. Arain, M.A., A. Ahmad & K.A. Sodium, 2000. Utilization of induced mutations for genetic improvement of wheat. In: Mutation Techniques and Molecular Genetics for Tropical and Subtropical Plant Improvement in Asia and the Pacific Region. IAEA-SR-210/6. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 109–111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Awan, M.A., 1991. Use of induced mutations for crop improvement in Pakistan. In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement. Vol. 1. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Badawi, A.T., 2001. Yield gap and productiviy decline in rice production in Egypt. In: Yield Gap and Productivity Decline in Rice Production. International Rice Commission, FAO, Rome, pp. 429–441.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bhatia, C.R., 1991. Economic impact of mutant varieties in India. In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement. Vol. 1. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bouma, J. & Z. Ohnoutka, 1991. Importance and application of the mutant 'Diamant' in spring barley breeding. In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement. Vol. 1. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bozzini, A., L. Rossi, C. Mosconi & G.T. Scarascia-Mugnozza, 1984. The genetic improvement of durum wheat at the Energy Research Center of Casaccia. Informatore-Agrario (Italy) 40: 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Broertjes, C. & A.M. van Harten, 1988. Applied Mutation Breeding for Vegetatively Propagated Crops. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Canadian Grain Commission, 2000. Quality of 2000 Western Canadian Canola. Canadian Grain Commission, 600-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Canada. http://www.cgc.ca/Quality/grlreports/Canola/2000.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Canola Connection, 2001. The Growers Manual. http://www.canola-council.org/production/canvarys.html.

  15. Chakrabarti, S.N., 1995. Mutation breeding in India with particular reference to PNR rice varieties. J Nuclear Agric Biol 24: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clampett, W.S., R.L. Williams & J.M. Lacy, 2001. Major achievements in closing yield gap of rice between research and farmers in Australia. In: Yield Gap and Productivity Decline in Rice Production. International Rice Comission, FAO, Rome, pp. 411–428.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Caldwell, D., N. McCallum, S. Mudie, P. Hedley, L. Ramsay, H. Liu, D. Marshall & R. Waugh, 2002. A physical/chemical mutation grid for barley functional genomics. In: Scottish Crop Research Institute. Annual Report 2001/2002, Dundee, pp. 157-158.

  18. Dixit, G.P., D.P. Tripathi, S. Chandra, T.N. Tewari & J.L. Tickoo, 2000. MULLaRP Crops: Varieties developed during the last fifty years. All India Coordinated Research Project on MUL-LaRP(ICAR), Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Domier, K.W., 1997. Fibre industry in Canada. Euroflax Newsl 2: 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Downey, R.K., 1990. Brassica oilseed breeding-achievements and opportunities. Plant Breed Abstracts 60: 1165–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dribnenki, J.C.P., A.G. Green & G.N. Atlin, 1996. Linola TM 989 low linolenic flax. Can J Plant Sci 76: 329–331.

    Google Scholar 

  22. FAO, 2001. FAOSTAT Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fick, G.N. & J.F. Miller, 1997. Sunflower breeding. In: A.A. Schneiter (Ed.), Sunflower Technology and Production, pp. 395–439. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Forster, B.P., 2001. Mutation genetics of salt tolerance in barley: an assessment of Golden Promise and other semi-dwarf mutants. Euphytica 120: 317–328.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Foster, R., D. Egel, E. Maynard, R. Weinzierl, M. Babbadoost, H. Taber, L.W. Jett & B. Hutchinson (Eds.), 2000. Mint (peppermint and spearmint). Midwest Vegetable Production Guide for Commercial Growers, Purdue, pp. 70–72.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Green, A.G., 1986. A mutant genotype of flax (Linum usitatissimum) containing very low levels of linolenic acid in its seed oil. Can J Plant Sci 66: 499–503.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Green, A.G. & J.C.P. Dribnenki, 1996. Breeding and development of LinolaTM(low linolenic flax). In: FAO-Proc. 3rd Intern. Flax Breeding Research Group, France. FAO, Rome, pp. 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hauser, M.T., F. Adhami, M. Dorner, E. Fuchs & J. Glossl, 1998. Generation of co-dominant PCR-based markers by duplex analysis on high resolution gels. Plant J 16: 117–125.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Health Canada, 1999. High oleic acid/low linolenic acid canola lines 45A37, 46A40. Novel Food Information-Food Biotechnology, FD/OFD-096-228-A. Office of Food Biotechnology, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, Ontario, pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hensz, R.A., 1991. Mutation breeding of grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.). In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement. Vol. I. SM-311, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 533–536.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, B., 1992. Genetic manipulation of microspores and microspore-derived embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28: 53–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huitema, J.B.M., W. Preil & J. DeJong, 1991. Methods for selection of low-temperature tolerant mutants of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. using irradiated cell suspension cultures. III. Comparison of mutants selected with or without preselection in vitro at low temperature. Plant Breed 107: 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jan, C.C., 1992. Inheritance and allelism of mitomycin C-and streptomycin-induced recessive genes for male sterility in cultivated sunflower. Crop Sci 32: 317–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jan, C.C. & J.N. Rutger, 1988. Mitomycin C-and streptomycin-induced male sterility in cultivated sunflower. Crop Sci 28: 792–795.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kale, D.M., Chandra Mouli, G.S.S. Murty & M.V.P. Rao, 1997. Development of a new groundnut variety 'TG-26' by using induced mutants in cross breeding. MBNL 43: 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Maluszynski, M., B.S. Ahloowalia & B. Sigurbjörnsson, 1995. Application of in vivo and in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement. Euphytica 85: 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Maluszynski, M., P. Gustafson, J. Maluszynska & I. Szarejko, 2001. Advanced breeding for germplasm enhancement and yield improvement. In: Yield Gap and Productivity Decline in Rice Production. FAO, Rome, pp. 191–224.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maluszynski, M., K. Nichterlein, L. van Zanten & B.S. Ahloowalia, 2000. Officially released mutant varieties-the FAO/IAEA Database. Mut Breed Rev 12: 1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maruyama, K., H. Araki & H. Kato, 1991. Thermosensitive genetic male-sterility induced by irradiation. In: Rice Genetics II. IRRI, Manila, pp. 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Matousek, J., J. Ptacek, P. Dedic & J. Schubert, 2000. Analysis of variability of P1 gene region of N strain of potato virus Y using temperature-gradient gel elecrtophoresis and DNA heteroduplex analysis. Acta Virol 44: 41–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McCallum, C.M., L. Comai, E.A. Greene & S. Henikoff, 2000a. Targeted screening for induced mutations. Nature Biotech 18: 455–457.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. McCallum, C.M., L. Comai, E.A. Greene & S. Henikoff, 2000b. Targeting induced local lesions in genomes (TILLING) for plant functional genomics. Plant Physiol 123: 439–442.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Miller, J.F. & G.N. Fick, 1997. The genetics of sunflower. In: A.A. Schneiter (Ed.), Sunflower Technology and Production, pp. 441–495. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Muller, H.J., 1927. Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science 66: 84–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Murray, M.J. & W.A. Todd, 1972. Registration of Todd's Mitcham peppermint. Crop Sci 12: 128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nichterlein, K., 1999. The role of induced mutations in the improvement of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). MBNL 44: 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Oleykowsky, C.A., C.R. Bronson Mullins, A.K. Godwin & A.T. Yeung, 1998. Mutation detection using a novel plant endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 4597–4602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Peterson, L. & F. Bienvenu, 1998. Peppermint oil. In: K. Hyde (Ed.), The New Rural Industries. A Handbook for Farmers and Investors. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Potts, D.A., G.W. Rakow & D.R. Males, 1999. Canola-quality Brassica juncea, a new oilseed crop for the Canadian prairies. In: New Horizons for an old crop. Proc 10th Intl rapeseed Congr, Canberra, Australia 1999. http://www.regional.org.au/au/gcirc/4/70.htm.

  50. Qiu, Q., Z. Li, F. Shen, Ch Wang & H. Miao, 1997. Peanut breeding through mutation techniques in China. MBNL 43: 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rampton, R., 2000. New sunflowers could change oilseed market. http://www.producer.com/articles/199912.

  52. Ro, P.V. & D.H. At, 2000. Improvement of traditional local varieties through induced mutations using nuclear techniques. In: T.D. Quy, N.H.Dong, L.D. Thanh, N.H.M. Quyen, P.D. Truc & P.V. Ro (Eds.), Seminar on Methodology for Plant Mutation Breeding for Quality: Effective use of physical/chemical Mutagens, pp. 90–94. AGI, VAEC, STA, JAERI, Hanoi.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Röbbelen, G., 1990. Mutation breeding for quality improvement-a case study for oilseed crops. Mut Breed Rev 6: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rutger, J.N., 1992. Impact of mutation breeding in rice-a review. Mut Breed Rev 8: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sauls, J.W., 1999. Texas citrus-Rootstock and scion varieties. http://www.aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/citrus/12304.htm pp. 1-7.

  56. Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.T., F. D'Amato, S. Avanzi, D. Bagnara, M.L. Belli, A. Bozzini, A. Brunori, T. Cervigni, M. Devreux, B. Donini, B. Giorgi, G. Martini, L.M. Monti, E. Moschini, C. Mosconi, G. Porreca & L. Rossi, 1993. Mutation breeding for durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum Desf.) improvement in Italy. Mut Breed Rev 10: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Scarth, R. & P.B.E. McVetty, 1999. Designer oil canola-a review of new food-grade Brassica oils with focus on high oleic, low linolenic types. New Horizons for an Old Crop. Proc 10th Intl Rapeseed Congr, Canberra, Australia. http://www.regional.org.au/au/gcirc/4/57.html.

  58. Shen, Y.W., Q.H. Cai & M.W. Gao, 1993. A new thermosensitive radiation-induced male-sterile rice line. RGN 10: 97–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Shu, Q., D. Wu & Y. Xia, 1997. The most widely cultivated rice variety 'Zhefu 802' in China and its geneology. MBNL 43: 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Skoric, D., 1988. Sunflower breeding. Uijarstvo 25: 3–90.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Soldatov, K.I., 1976. Chemical mutagenesis in sunflower breeding. In: Proceedings of the VIIth International Sunflower Conference. Vol. 1. Krasnodar, pp. 352-357.

  62. Spiegel-Roy, P., 1990. Economic and agricultural impact of mutation breeding in fruit trees. Mut Breed Rev 5: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Stadler, L.J., 1928. Mutations in barley induced by X-rays and radium. Science 68: 186–187.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Stokes, T., 2001. Opium-free poppy. Trends in Plant Science 6: 244.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Swanson, E.B., M.P. Coumans, G.L. Brown, J.D. Patel & W.D. Beversdorf, 1988. The characterization of herbicide tolerant plants in Brassica napus L. after in vitro selection of microspores and protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 7: 83–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Temesgen, B., G.R. Brown, D.E. Harry, C.S. Kinlaw, M.M. Sewell & D.B. Neale, 2001. Genetic mapping of expressed sequence tag polymorphism (ESTP) markers in loblloly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theor Appl Genet 102: 664–675.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. United Oilseeds, 1997. Ramrod-first Polish-bred pea for UK. Press release, United Oilseeds. Devlzes, Wiltshire, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wang, L., 1995. Combining radiation mutation techniques with biotechnology for soybean breeding. Research Report, IAEA. Vienna, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Wei, W., P. Bilsborrow, P. Hooley, D. Fincham & B. Forster, 2001. Variation between two near isogenic barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars in expression of the B subunit of the vacuolar ARPase in response to salinity. Hereditas 135: 227–231.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wong, R.S.C. & E. Swanson, 1991. Genetic modification of canola oil: high oleic acid canola. In: C. Haberstroh & C.E. Morris (Eds.), Fat and Cholesterol Reduced Food, pp. 154–164. Gulf, Houston, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Maluszynski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahloowalia, B., Maluszynski, M. & Nichterlein, K. Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica 135, 187–204 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000014914.85465.4f

Download citation

  • crop improvement
  • economic impact
  • induced mutations
  • mutant value
  • mutant variety