Abstract
We investigated U.S. and Canadian reactions to workplace drug and alcohol testing programs. Canadian truck drivers (n = 183) deemed drug and alcohol testing policies less fair, and were less accepting of these policies, than their American counterparts (n = 153). We also compared the perspectives of recipients versus third-party observers with regard to their reactions to a drug testing program. Unlike the pattern observed among American observers, the responses by Canadian observers were highly similar to those of the recipients. Canadian observers were more inclined to file a formal protest regarding the implementation of a drug and alcohol testing program than were U.S. observers. The results also showed that procedural and interactional justice principles contributed to the program's fairness, acceptance, and lower levels of protest intentions in both Canada and the United States. We propose that scholars and practitioners can gain a better understanding of multinational reactions to drug and alcohol testing by considering not only cultural but also historical, social, political, and other environmental factors that can shape reactions to personnel practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beltrame, J. (2001). Reefer madness: The sequel. Grass, pot, ganja, whatever you call it, it's still a crime to smoke it. Is it time to relax the country's drug laws? Many Canadians say yes. Maclean's, 114, 22-25.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B., & Bazerman, M. H. (Eds.). Research on Negotiations in Organizations, Vol. 1. 43-55. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, 1, 199-218.
Brockner, I., & Greenberg, J. (1990). The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective. In Carroll, J. S. (Ed.). Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings. 45-75. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bruce, P. G. (1989). Political parties and labor legislation in Canada and the U.S. Industrial Relations, 28, 115-141.
Butler, B. (1997). Alcohol and drug testing in Canada. Occupational Health and Safety Canada, 13, 28-31.
Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse (2000). Canadian Profile 1999. Ottawa, Ontario.
Chaison, G. N., & Rose, J. B. (1991). Continental divide: The direction and fate of North American unions. In Sockell, D., Lewin, D., & Lipsky, D. B. (Eds.). Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 5, 169-205. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation; Design and Analysis for Field Settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
Cropanzano, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1995). Resolving the justice dilemma by improving the outcomes: The case of employee drug screening. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 221-243.
Dreier, P., & Bernard, E. (1992), Canada: A kinder, gentler nation. Social Policy, 23, 6-19.
England, G. W., Negandhi, A. R., & Wilpert, B. (1979). Organizational Functioning in a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
Evans, W., Lane, H., & O'Grady, S. (1992). Border Crossings: Doing Business in the US. Scarborough, Ontario: Prentice-Hall.
Flynn, G. (1996). Wilt drug testing pass or fail in court? Personnel Journal, 75, 141-144.
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Goldman, B. M. (2001). Toward an understanding of employment discrimination claiming: An integration of organizational justice and social information processing theories. Personnel Psychology, 54, 361-386.
Goodstein, E. S. (1988). Contemporary architecture and Canadian national identity. American Review of Canadian Studies, 18, 127-160.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
Greenberg, J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work-site smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 288-297.
Greenberg, J., & Eskew, D. E. (1993). The role of role-playing in organizational research. Journal of Management, 19, 221-241.
Henriksson, L. E. (1991). The unconvincing case for drug testing. Canadian Public Policy, 17, 183-196.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
James, K. (1993). The social context of organizational justice: Cultural, intergroup, and structural effects on justice behaviors and perceptions. In Cropanzano, R. (Ed.). Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. 21-50. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Konovsky, M. A. (2000), Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 489-512.
Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 698-707.
Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1993). Justice considerations in employee drug testing. In Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. 171-192. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leung, K., Chiu, W., & Au, Y. (1993). Sympathy and support for industrial actions: A justice analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 781-787.
Lind, E. A., Kray, L., & Thompson, L. (1998). The social construction of injustice: Fairness judgments in response to own and other's unfair treatment by authorities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 1-22.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
Lipset, S. M. (1990). Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.
Lipset, S. M. (1995). Trade union exceptionalism: The United States and Canada. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 538, 115-130.
Lipset, S. M. (1996). American exceptionalism: A double-edged sword. New York: W.W. Norton
Lipset, S. M., & Meltz, N. M. (1999). Canadian and American attitudes toward work and institutions. Perspectives on Work, 1, 14-19.
Macdonald, S. (1995). The role of drugs in workplace injuries: Is drug testing appropriate? Journal of Drug Issues, 25, 703-722.
Morris, M. W., & Leung, K. (2000). Justice for all? Progress in research on cultural variation in the psychology of distributive and procedural justice. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 100-132.
Murphy, K. R., Reynolds, D. H., & Thornton, G. C. (1990). College students' attitudes toward employee drug testing programs. Personnel Psychology, 43, 615-631.
Pearce, J. L., Bigley, G. A., & Branyicki, I. (1998). Procedural justice as modernism: Placing industrial/organisational psychology in context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 371-396.
Pinsonneault, M. (1995). Some legal aspects of drug testing in the Canadian workplace. Human rights, collective bargaining and labor arbitration, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In Macdonald, S. & Roman, P. M. (Eds.). Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems, Vol. 2. 166-183. New York: Plenum.
Ronen, S., & Kraut, A.I. (1977). Similarities among countries based on employee work values and attitudes. Columbia Journal of World Business, 12, 89-96.
Rose, J. B., & Chaison, G. N. (1996). Linking union density and union effectiveness: The North American experience. Industrial Relations, 35, 78-105.
Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1-14.
Schneider, B. (1985). Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. In Staw, B. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 1-31. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Seijts, G. H., Skarlicki, D. P., & Gilliland, S. W. (2002). Reactions to managing counterproductive behavior through the implementation of a drug and alcohol testing program: Americans and Canadians are more different than you might expect. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 45-52.
Sirota, D., & Greenwood, M. J. (1971). Understand your overseas work force. Harvard Business Review, 49, 53-60.
Skarlicki, D. P., Ellard, J. H., & Kelln, B. C. (1998). Third-party perceptions of a lay-off: Procedural, derogation, and retributive aspects of justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 119-127.
Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134-141.
Stone, D. L., & Kotoh, D. A. (1989). Individuals' attitudes toward organizational drug testing policies and practices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 518-521.
Swena, D., & Gaines, W. (1999). Effect of random drug screening on fatal commercial truck accident rates. Unpublished manuscript. College of Medicine, Texas A &M University.
Trevino, L. K. (1992). The social effect of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17, 647-676.
Truxillo, D. M., Bauer, T. N., & Paronto, M. E. (2002). Reactions to organizational alcohol testing and treatment programs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 31-45.
Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
Walster, E., Walster, G. N., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Wood, C. (1989). Separate identities. Maclean's, 102, 32-35.
Woodcock, G. (1987). Northern Spring: The Flowering of Canadian Literature. Vancouver, Canada: Douglas and McIntyre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seijts, G.H., Skarlicki, D.P. & Gilliland, S.W. Canadian and American Reactions to Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs in the Workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 15, 191–208 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERRJ.0000004058.01981.70
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERRJ.0000004058.01981.70