Skip to main content
Log in

U.S. Pay Equity Legislation: Sheep in Wolves' Clothing

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last century, women in the United States have made tremendous changes to their labor market behavior. What has not changed very much over this time period is the relative economic status of women compared to men. Another constant has been a high level of job segregation by gender, such that few organizations employ both men and women to do a particular job. These facts have led many scholars to conclude that employers systematically undervalue female-dominated jobs, and that legislative initiatives are needed to rectify this problem. This paper reviews 4 bills that have been introduced in the U.S. Congress. Each of these bills contains loopholes that would allow most employers to maintain their current pay rates. The Congressional initiatives are contrasted with a much more stringent bill that has been introduced in the New York state legislature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anker, R. (1997). Theories of occupational segregation by sex; An overview. International Labour Review, 136, 315-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R. J., & Ballman, D. M. (1986). AFSCME v. Washington: The death of comparable worth? University of Miami Law Review, 40, 1039-1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., & Fortin, N. M. (2000). Does comparable worth work in a decentralized labor market? Retreived from www.nber.org/papers/w7937.

  • Bielby, W. T., & Baron, J. N. (1986). Sex segregation within occupations. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 43-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, M. (1999). Women's earnings: An overview. Monthly Labor Review, 122(12), 13-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, W. J., & Troske, K. R. (1995). Gender segregation in small firms. The Journal of Human Resources, 30, 503-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. N., & Bianchi, S. M. (1999). Marriage, children, and women's employment: What do we know? Monthly Labor Review, 122(12), 22-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groshen, E. L, (1991). The structure of the female/male wage differential: Is it who you are, what you do, or where you work? The Journal of Human Resources, 26, 457-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, J. P. (1999). Labor force participation. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 39, 597-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, D., & Krehbiel, K. (1996). Dynamics of cosponsorship. American Political Science Review, 90, 555-566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killingsworth, M. R. (2002). Comparable worth and pay equity: Recent developments in the United States. Canadian Public Policy, 28, S171-S186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, T. J., & Ginsberg, B. (1996). American Government, 4th ed. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, R. T., & Hartmann, H. I. (1989). Pay equity: Assessing the issues. In Michael, R. T., Hartmann, H. I., & O'Farrell, B. (Eds.), Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries, 1-20. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (1999). Compensation, 6th ed. Boston: Irwin-McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutari, E., & Figart, J. M. (1997). Markets, flexibility, and family: Evaluating the gendered discourse against pay equity. Journal of Economic Issues, 31, 687-705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, D. (1996). Sex discrimination in hiring in the restaurant industry: An audit study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 915-942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, J. A. (1999). Occupational gender segregation: Trends and explanations. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 39, 611-624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (2003). New opportunity for equal pay bills. Retreived from www.liwomen.com/newopportunity.html

  • Sorensen, E. (1989). Measuring the effect of occupational sex and race composition on earnings. In Michael, R. T., Hartmann, H. I., & O'Farrell, B. (Eds.), Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries, 49-69. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R., & Haignere, L. (1984). Separate but equivalent: Equal pay for work of comparable worth. In Haignere, L., Reskin, B. F., & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), Gender at Work: Perspectives on Occupational Segregation and Comparable Worth, 13-26. Washington, DC: Women's Research and Education Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (1983). Pay equity and comparable worth. Labor Law Journal, 34(1), 3-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, D. J. (1984). Effect of choice of factors and factor weights in job evaluation. In Remick, H. (Ed.), Comparable Worth and Wage Discrimination: Technical Possibilities and Political Realities, 79-89. Philadelphia: Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, D. J., & Hartmann, H. I. (1981). Women, Work, and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, N. (2002). Effective redress of pay inequities. Canadian Public Policy, 28, S101-S115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, G., Zetlin, D., & Earnshaw, J. (2001). Prosecuting pay equity: Evolving strategies in Britain and Australia. Gender, Work, and Organization, 8, 365-386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rudin, J.P., Byrd, K. U.S. Pay Equity Legislation: Sheep in Wolves' Clothing. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 15, 183–190 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERRJ.0000004057.30278.4c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERRJ.0000004057.30278.4c

Navigation