Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Independent Collective Representation: Providing Effectiveness, Fairness, and Democracy in the Employment Relationship

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Protection against arbitrary management action has always been a concern of employees. Enlightened managerialism has been one approach to addressing these concerns. This approach is compromised by the conflicts of interest that characterize the employment relationship in a market system. We argue in this paper that independent collective representation functions to protect employees while leaving the employer with sufficient freedom to manage. Trade unions, as a counter weight to the exercise of absolute managerial power, complement a pluralist democratic system. The exercise of absolute power, the absence of accountability and countervailing checks and balances, are foreign to any democratic polity. At enterprise level, trade unions manage the ongoing tensions and conflicts between democratic humanistic values and market values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, P. (1967). The limits and possibilities of trade union action. In Blackburn, R., & Cockburn, A. (Eds.), The Incompatibles: Trade Union Militancy and the Consensus, 263-280. Harmondsworth, Baltimore: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, P. (1994), Managing Culture. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, P. D. (1986). The Foundations of Management. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbash, J. (1985). Do we really want Labor on the ropes? Harvard Business Review, July–Aug.: 10-15.

  • Beaumont, P. (1995). The Future of Employment Relations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R. (1963). Work and Authority in Industry. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyton, P., & Turnbull, P. (1994). The Dynamics of Employee Relations. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. C., & Dunlop, I. T. (1970). Labor and the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, P. (1983). Authority and Participation in Industry. London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock Report (1977). Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Industrial Democracy. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, B., & Bowers, D. (1979). Trade Unions and the Economy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1969). British Management Thought. London: Alien and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, P., Eldridge, J., & MacInnes, J. (1985). Just Managing: Authority and Democracy in Industry. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cully, M., Woodland, S., O'Reilly, A., & Dix, G. (1999). Britain at Work: As Depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employee Relations Survey. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Art, D., & Turner, T. (1999). An attitudinal revolution in Irish industrial relations: The end of “Them and Us?” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 37(1), 101-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, W. W., & McIntosh, N. (1972). The Right to Manage? 3rd Impression, London: Macdonald and Jane's.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan Report (1968). Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employers Associations 1965–1968. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (1995). The employment relationship. In Edwards, P. (Ed.), Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice in Britain, 32. Oxford; Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. K. (1986). Conflict at Work: A Materialist Analysis of Workplace Relations. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. K., & Scullion, H. (1982). The Social Organisation of Industrial Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, A., & Hyman, R. (1992). Industrial Relations in the New Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, P., & Toner, B. (1996). Managing without unions: A pyrrhic victory? In Flood, P. C., Gannon, M. J., & Paauwe, J. (Eds.), Managing Without Traditional Methods, 154. London: University Press Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, P., & Turner, T. (1993). Human resource strategy and the non-union phenomenon. Employee Relations, 15(6), 54-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, J. A. (1995). Labor Relations: Development–Structure–Process. 6th Ed., Chicago: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. (1971). A Sociology of Work in Industry. London: Collier-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. (1974). Man Mismanagement. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, T. (2001). One Market Under God: Extreme Capitalism, Market Populism and the End of Economic Democracy. London: Seeker and Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. L. (1984). What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1977). Industry and Labor: Class Struggle at Work and Monopoly Capitalism. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1990). Managerial strategies, activities, techniques and technology: Towards a complex theory of the labor process. In Knight, D., & Wilmott, H. (Eds.), Labor Process Theory, 179. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D., White, M., Cheng, Y., & Tomlinson, M. (1998). Restructuring the Employment Relationship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1973). The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunnigle, P. (1999). Involvement, participation and partnership: A review of the debate and some reflections on the Irish context. In The 24th. Countess Markievecz Memorial Lecture, Dublin, Nov. 22, 1999.

  • Harbison, F. H. (1954). Collective bargaining and American capitalism In Kornhauser, A. Dubin, R., & Ross, A. M. (Eds.), Industrial Conflict, 270-279. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart Research Associates (1999). Americans Views on Key National Issues. Survey conducted on behalf of the AFL-CIO, Washington, DC. http://www.aflcio.org/labor99/am_attitude.htm

  • Hawkins, K. (1981). Trade Unions, London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S. (1981). Competition and Control at Work. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (1999). Economics and Utopia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (2000). Unfair Advantage: Workers Freedom of Association in the United States. New York: Human Rights Watch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1972). Strikes. Glasgow, Scottland: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1973). Marxism and the Sociology of Trade Unions. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, J., & Mason, B. (1995). Managing Employee Involvement and Participation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, S. M. (1991). American exceptionalism revisted: The importance of management. In Jacoby, S. M. (Ed.), Masters to Managers: Historical and Comparative Perspectives on American Employers, 173-200. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy, T. (1985). Invitation to Industrial Relations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenoy, T., & Anthony, P. (1992). HRM: Metaphor, meaning and morality. In Blyton, P., & Turnbull, P. (Eds.), Reassessing Human Resource Management, 240-241. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J., & Kelly, C. (1991). “Them and Us” social psychology and the new industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 29(1), 25-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T., & Weinstein, M. (1994). Recent developments in US industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32(4), 483-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, K. A. (1992). Labor Relations: A Diagnostic Approach. New York: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, J. J. (1990). Unionisation and Deunionisation: Strategy, Tactics and Outcomes. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leat, M. (1998). Human Resource Issues of the European Union. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, K. (1995). Human Resource Management: Rhetoric's and Realities. London: Macmillan Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. (1987). Industrial relations as a strategic variable, In Kleiner, M. Block, N. Roomkin, M., & Salsburg, S. (Eds.), Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm, Industrial Relations Research Association, University of Wisconsin.

  • McLoughlin, I. (1996). Inside the non-union firm. In Ackers, P., Smith, C., & Smith, P. (Eds.), The New Workplace and Trade Unionism, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, I., & Gourlay, S. (1994). Enterprise Without Unions: Industrial Relations in the Non-Union Firm, 301-323. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchington, M. (1982). Managing Industrial Relations. Oxford: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (1997). The American labor movement in transition. In Mortimer, D. Leece, P., & Morris, R. (Eds.), Readings in Contemporary Employment Relations, Centre for Employment Relations, 238. University of Western Sydney.

  • Millward, N., Stevens, M., Smart, D., & Hawes, W. (1992). Workplace Industrial Relations in Transition. Aldershot, England: Dartmouth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organisation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, B. (2003). The recent past and new future of private sector unionism in the US: An appraisal. Journal of Labour Research, 24(2), 323-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, C. (1985). Disorganised Capitalism: Contemporary Transformations of Work and Politics. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollert, A. (1996) Team work on the assembly line: Contradictions and the dynamics of union resilience. In Ackers, P., Smith, C., & Smith, P. (Eds.), The New Workplace and Trade Unionism. 206. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, H. (1975). Firms and football teams. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 13(3), 396-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. I. (1989). The Sociology of Management. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, G. (1979). Work Organisations: Resistance and Control. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, T. (1985). Democracy at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. (1994). Willing Slaves? British Workers Under Human Resource Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1980). The Challenge to Management Control. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1992). Developments in the Management of Human Resources. Oxford: Blackwell Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, P., & Ross, P. (1969). American labor violence: Its causes, character and outcome. In Graham, H. D., & Gurr, T. R. (Eds.), Violence in America: Historical and Comparative Perspectives (Report to the National Commission on the causes and prevention of violence, June 1969). New York: Signet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. J. (1989). Trade Unions and Politics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (1994). The Future of Trade Unions. London: Andre Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1989). The Nature of Work: An Introduction to Debates on the Labor Process, 2nd ed., London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. J. (1986). Management, Organisation and Employment Strategy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, H. (1987). Management–labor relations in the USA. In Bamber, G. J., & Lansbury, R. D. (Eds.), International and Comparative Industrial Relations, 57-79. London: Unwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, H. N. (1989). Social dominance and industrial relations. In Barbash, J., & Barbash, K. (Eds.), Theories and Concepts in Comparative Industrial Relations, 184-193. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, C. (1982). Worker Priorities, Trust in Management and Prospects for Worker Participation, Paper No. 111. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoll, R. (1996). Modernisation, trade unions and solidarity. In Leisink, P. Van Leemput, J., & Vilrokx, J. (Eds.), The Challenge to Trade Unions in Europe, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Personnel and Employment Relations, College of Business University of Limerick, Ireland

    Daryl D'Art & Thomas Turner

Authors
  1. Daryl D'Art
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

D'Art, D., Turner, T. Independent Collective Representation: Providing Effectiveness, Fairness, and Democracy in the Employment Relationship. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 15, 169–181 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERRJ.0000004056.14207.ce

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ERRJ.0000004056.14207.ce

Search

Navigation