Skip to main content
Log in

Artificial Neural Networks for Risk Decision Support in Natural Hazards: A Case Study of Assessing the Probability of House Survival from Bushfires

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk decision-making in natural hazards encompasses a plethora of environmental, socio-economic and management-related factors, and benefits greatly from exploring possible patterns and relations among these multivariate factors. Artificial neural networks, capable of general pattern classifications, are potentially well suited for risk decision support in natural hazards. This paper reports an example that assesses the risk patterns or probabilities of house survival from bushfires using artificial neural networks, with a simulation data set based on the empirical study by Wilson and Ferguson (Predicting the probability of house survival during bushfires, Journal of Environmental Management 23 (1986) 259–270). The aim of this study was to re-model and predict the relationship between risk patterns of house survival and a series of independent variables. Various configurations for input and output variables were tested using neural networks. An approach for converting linguistic terms into crisp numbers was used to incorporate linguistic variables into the quantitative neural network analysis. After a series of tests, results show that neural networks are capable of predicting risk patterns under all tested configurations of input and output variables, with a great deal of flexibility. Risk-based mathematical functions, be they linear or non-linear, can be re-modelled using neural networks. Finally, the paper concludes that the artificial neural networks serve as a promising risk decision support tool in natural hazards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Chen, R. Blong and C. Jacobson, MCE-RISK: integrating multicri-teria evaluation and GIS for risk decision-making in natural hazards, Environmental Modelling and Software 16 (2001) 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S.J. Chen and C.L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (Springer, Berlin, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Civco, Artificial neural networks for land cover classification and mapping, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 7 (1993) 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.H. Gimblett, G.L. Ball and A.W. Guisse, Autonomous rule gener-ation and assessment for complex spatial modeling, Landscape and Urban Planning 30 (1994) 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.T. Hagan, H.B. Demuth and M. Beale, Neural Network Design (PWS Publishing Company, Boston, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B.C. Hewitson and R.G. Crane, Neural Nets: Applications in Geog-raphy (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.L. Hwang and K.P. Yoon, Multiple attribute decision making: meth-ods and applications, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (186) (Springer, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.R. Jang, C.T. Sun and E. Mizutani, Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Comput-ing: A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelli-gence (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.K. Lein, Mapping environmental carrying capacity using an artificial neural network: a first experiment, Land Degradation & Rehabilita-tion 6 (1995) 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.K. Lein, Environmental Decision Making: An Information Technol-ogy Approach (Blackwell Science, Boston, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Masters, Neural, Novel & Hybrid Algorithms for Times Series Pre-diction (Wiley, New York, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Openshaw and C. Openshaw, Artificial Intelligence in Geography (Wiley, Chichester, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.C. Ramsay, N.A. McArthur and V.P. Dowling, Building in a fire-prone environment: research on building survival in two major bush-fires, Proceedings of the Linnean Society of NSW 116 (1996) 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B.D. Ripley, Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Stassopoulou, M. Petrou and J. Kittler, Application of a Bayesian network in a GIS based decision making system, International Journal of Geographical Information Science 12 (1998) 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Wang, The use of artificial neural networks in a geographical infor-mation system for agricultural land-suitability assessment, Environ-ment and Planning A 26 (1994) 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.A.G. Wilson and I.S. Ferguson, Fight or flee? - a case study of the Mount Macedon bushfire, Australian Forestry 47 (1984) 230–236.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.A.G. Wilson and I.S. Ferguson, Predicting the probability of house survival during bushfires, Journal of Environmental Management 23 (1986) 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y. Yin and X. Xu, Applying neural net technology for multi-objective land use planning, Journal of Environmental Management 32 (1991) 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, K., Jacobson, C. & Blong, R. Artificial Neural Networks for Risk Decision Support in Natural Hazards: A Case Study of Assessing the Probability of House Survival from Bushfires. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 9, 189–199 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ENMO.0000049389.16864.b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ENMO.0000049389.16864.b0

Navigation