Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of Plant Diversity at Landscape Level: A Methodological Approach Applied to Three Spanish Rural Areas

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Approaches linking biodiversity assessment with landscape structure are necessary in the framework of sustainable rural development. The present paper describes a methodology to estimate plant diversity involving landscape structure as a proportional weight associated with different plant communities found in the landscape mosaic. The area occupied by a plant community, its patch number or its spatial distribution of patches are variables that could be expressed in gamma plant diversity of a territory. The methodology applies (1) remote sensing information, to identify land cover and land use types; (2) aspect, to discriminate composition of plant communities in each land cover type; (3) multi-scale field techniques, to asses plant diversity; (4) affinity analysis of plant community composition, to validate the stratified random sampling design and (5) the additive model that partitions gamma diversity into its alpha and beta components. The method was applied to three Spanish rural areas and was able to record 150–260 species per ha. Species richness, Shannon information index and Simpson concentration index were used to measure diversity in each area. The estimation using Shannon diversity index and the product of patch number and patch interspersion as weighting of plant community diversity was found to be the most appropriate method of measuring plant diversity at the landscape level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D.: 1975, ‘Components of diversity’, Oecologia 18, 359–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon: 2000, ‘Indicadores para la integración de las consideraciones medioambientales en la Política Agraria ComÚn’, Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas COM (2000) 20.

  • Anon: 2001, ‘Indicadores estructurales’, Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas COM(2001)619

  • Atauri, J. A. and De Lucio, J. V.: 2001, ‘The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes’, Landscape Ecol. 16, 147–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, C. L., Willians, J. B. and Charley, J. L.: 1998, ‘The impact of aspect on forest structure and floristic in some eastern Australian sites’, Forest Ecol. Manage. 110, 363–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolaños, F., García del Barrio, J. M., Sánchez-Palomares, O., Camacho, G. and Elena-Rosselló, R.: 2001, ‘Tendencias evolutivas en paisajes con rebollo (Quercus pyrenaica Willd) durante el periodo 1956–1984. Valoración del significado de algunos índices de paisaje’, Junta de Andalucía (ed), III Congreso Forestal Español, Granada, Spain, 25–28 September 2001, pp 285–292.

  • Campbell, P., Comiskey, J. Alonso, A., Dallmeier, F., Nuñez, P., Beltran, H., Baldeon, S., Nauray,W., De La Colina, R., Acurio, L. and Udvardy, S.: 2002, ‘ModifiedWhittaker plots as and assessment and monitoring tool for vegetation in a lowland tropical rainforest’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 76, 19–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, M. J. and Noon, B. R.: 1996, ‘Mapping of species richness for conservation of biological diversity: conceptual and methodological issues’, Ecol. Appl. 6(3), 763–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, R. M., Rundel, P. W., Lamont, B. B., Arroyo, M. K. and Arianoutsou, M.: 1996, ‘Plant diversity in Mediterranean-climate regions’, Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 362–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duelli, P.: 1997, ‘Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales’, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 62, 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC and EEA: 2000, ‘From land cover to landscape diversity in the European Union’, in http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/publi/landscape/index.htm.

  • EEA and ETC: 1999, ‘Land Cover, Corine Land Cover Technical Guide’, in http://etc.satellus.se/the_data/Technical_Guide/index.htm.

  • Elena-Roselló, R.: 1997, ‘Clasificación Biogeoclimática de España Peninsular y Balear’, Ministerio de Agricultura pesca y Alimentación, Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkie, P., Rempel, R. and Carr, A.: 1999, Patch Analyst User's Manual, Ont. Min. Natur. Resour. Northwestern Sci. and Technol. Thunder Bay, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farina, A.: 2000, Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T.: 1995, Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. E., Connery, D. R. and Williams, J. A.: 1994, ‘Classification of alpine vegetation using Landsat thematic mapper, SPOT HRV, and DEM data’, Can. J. Remote Sens. 20, 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Bernáldez, F., Abello, R. P., Galiano, E. F., Herrero, C., Levassor, C., de Nicolás, J. P., Pineda, F. D., Peco, B., Pou, A., Parra, F. and Ruíz, M.: 1980, ‘Modelos de paisaje en zonas de montaña de Madrid’, in Ministerio de Agricultura, Ministere de L'Environnement et du cadre de vie (ed.), Coloquio Hispano-Francés sobre áreas de montaña, Madrid. pp 113–123.

  • Griffiths, G. H., Lee, J. and Eversham, B. C.: 2000, ‘Landscape pattern and species richness; regional scale analysis from remote sensing’, Int. J.Remote Sens. 21, 2685–2704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, L., Fahrig, L. and Merrian, G. (Editors).: 1995, Mosaic Landscapes and Ecological Processes, Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, J. J. and Fowler, G. W.: 1999, ‘Bias, precision and accuracy of four measures of species richness’, Ecol. Appl. 9(3), 824–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, M. A.: 1999, ‘Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals’, Oikos 86, 393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, K.: 1970, ‘A test for comparing diversities based on the Shannon formula’, J. Theor. Biol. 29, 151–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, P.: 1901, ‘Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Dranes et dans quelques regions voisines’, Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Naturelles 37, 241–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R.: 1996, ‘Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities’, Oikos 76, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. C.: 1972, ‘The apportionment of human diversity’, Evol. Biol. 6, 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau, M.: 2000, ‘Are communities saturated? On the relationship between α, β and γ diversity’, Ecol. Lett. 3, 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E.: 1988, ‘Ecological Diversity and its Measurement’, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal, K. and Marks, B.: 1994, Fragstats: ‘Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. Reference Manual’. For. Sci. Dep. Oregon State university, Corvallis, Oregón.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. and Franklin, J.: 2002, ‘Modelling the distribution of four vegetation alliances using generalized linear models and classification trees with spatial dependence’, Ecol. Model. 157, 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H.: 1974, Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology, John Wiley and Sons. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. and Kent, J.: 2000, ‘Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities’, Nature 403, 853–858.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H. and Gadgil, M.: 1999a, ‘Biodiversity assessment at multiple scales: Linking remotely sensed data with field information’, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 9154–9158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, H. and Gadgil, M.: 1999b, ‘Satellite imagery as a tool for monitoring species diversity: an assessment’, J. Appl. Ecol. 36, 388–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. D.: 1987, ‘From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: A look at the nature conservancy (USA)’, Biol. Conserv. 41, 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. D.: 1990, ‘Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach’, Conserv. Biol. 4(4), 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F.: 1999, ‘Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: a suggested framework and indicators’, Forest Ecol. Manage. 115, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, G. P. and Taillie, C.: 1982, ‘Diversity as a concept and its measurement’, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 77, 548–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters, K. H., O Neill, R. V., Hunsaker, C. T., Wickham, J. D, Yakee, D. H., Timmins, S. P., Jones, K. B. and Jackson, B. L.: 1995, ‘A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics’, Landscape Ecol. 10(1), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, S. M.: 1992, ‘Measuring pattern diversity’, Ecology 73(5), 1860–1867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriever, J. R. and Congalton, R. G.: 1993, ‘Mapping forest cover in New Hampshire using multitemporal Landsat Thematic Mapper data. ASPRS/ACSM’, Ann. Convent. Exposit. 3, 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. M., Davis, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R., Butterfield, B., Groves, C., Anderson, H., Caicco, S., D'Erchia, F., Edwards, T. C., Ulliman, J. and Wright, R. G.: 1993, GAP Analysis: ‘A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity’, Wild. Monogr. 123, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W.: 1962, The Mathematical Theory of Communication, Univ. of Illinois Press. Urbana. IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmida, A.: 1984, ‘Whittaker's plant diversity sampling method’, Isr. J. Bot. 33, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E. H.: 1949, ‘Measurement of diversity’, Nature 163, 688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren, T. J. Falkner, M. B. and Schell, L. D.: 1995, ‘A modified-Whittaker nested vegetation sampling method’, Vegetatio 117, 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren, T. J., Coughenour, M. B., Chong, G. V., Blinkey, D., Kalkhan, M. A., Schell, L. D., Buckley, D. J. and Berry, J. K.: 1997a, ‘Landscape analysis of plant diversity’, Landscape Ecol. 12, 170–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohlgren, T. J., Chong, G. V., Kalkhan, M. A. and Schell, L. D.: 1997b, ‘Rapid assessment of plant diversity patterns: A methodology for landscapes’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 48, 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, B. A. and Cook, J. E.: 2001, ‘A landscape-level assessment of understory diversity in upland forest of North-Central Wisconsin, USA’, Landscape Ecol. 16, 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treitz, P. M., Howerth, P. J., Shuffling, R. C. and Smith, P.: 1992, ‘Application of detailed ground information to vegetation mapping with high spatial resolution digital imagery’, Remote Sens. Environ. 42, 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H. (Editors): 1991, Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity, Springer-Verlag. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. H., Wildi, O. and Ewald, K. C.: 2000, ‘Additive partitioning of plant species diversity in an agricultural mosaic landscape’, Landscape Ecol. 15, 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. H. and Edwards, P. J.: 2001, ‘Quantifying habitat specificity to assess the contribution of a patch to species richness at a landscape scale’, Landscape Ecol. 16, 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R. H.: 1972, ‘Evolution and measurement of species diversity’, Taxonomy 21, 213–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, P. T., Mladenoff, D. J., Host, G. E. and Crow, T. R.: 1995, ‘Improved forest classification in the Northern Lake States using multi-temporal Landsat imagery’, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 61, 1129–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld, I. S.: 1995, ‘Vicinism and mass effect’, J. Veg. Sci. 5, 441–444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centro de Investigación Forestal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, CIFOR-INIA, Carretera de La Coruña KM 7,500, 28040, Madrid

    M. Ortega & J. M. García del Barrio

  2. Departamento de Silvopascicultura, Escuela Universitaria de Ingenieros Técnicos Forestales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n., Madrid, Spain

    R. Elena-Rosello

Authors
  1. M. Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Elena-Rosello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. M. García del Barrio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. García del Barrio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ortega, M., Elena-Rosello, R. & García del Barrio, J.M. Estimation of Plant Diversity at Landscape Level: A Methodological Approach Applied to Three Spanish Rural Areas. Environ Monit Assess 95, 97–116 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000029893.27432.1c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000029893.27432.1c

Search

Navigation