Abstract
A methodology was developed to prioritize the suitability of sites for long-term monitoring of avian populations, including vulnerable species, both to enhance assessment of changes in ecological resources and to facilitate land-use planning at the regional scale. This paper argues that a successful monitoring program begins with a site prioritization procedure that integrates scores based on spatial controls with ecological and socio-economic indicators, particularly those dependent on community involvement. The evaluation strategy in this study combines 1) spatial controls such as land ownership and accessibility, with 2) biological and habitat indicators such as vulnerable species and habitat connectivity, and 3) community and agency variables such as volunteer commitment and agency priorities. In total, a set of ten indicators was identified. This strategy was applied to predominantly agricultural landscapes, which are experiencing increasing human pressures, in three sub-watersheds of the Credit River, Southern Ontario. Specifically, bird populations were recorded during the breeding seasons of 2000–2002 in nine land units or habitat types including marsh, deciduous forest, and grasslands as mapped by Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) following Ecological Land Classification (ELC) guidelines. CVC selected sites for long-term monitoring in 2002 and the relationships between the scored (or ranked) sites and the selected long-term monitoring sites are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry, G.R., Rooney, T.P., Ventura, S.J. and Waller, D.M.: 2001, 'Evaluation of biodiversity values based on wildness: a study of the western northwoods, Upper Great Lakes, USA', Nat. Areas J. 21, 229-242.
Beard, G.R., Scott, W.A. and Adamson, J.K.: 1999, 'The value of consistent methodology in longterm environmental monitoring', Environ. Monit. Assess. 54, 239-258.
Cadman, M.D., Eagles, P.F.J. and Helleiner, F.M.: 1987, Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Ontario University of Waterloo Press, Ontario, Canada, p. 617.
Canterbury, G.E., Martin, T.E., Petit, D.R., Petit, L.J. and Bradford, D.F.: 2000, 'Bird communities and habitat as ecological indicators of forest condition in regional monitoring', Conserv. Biol. 14, 544-558.
CVC: 1998, 'Credit Watershed Bird Species of Conservation Concern', Credit Valley Conservation, Meadowvale, Ontario, Canada.
CVC: 1999, 'Habitat Utilization Matrix for the Birds of the Credit Watershed,' Credit Valley Conservation, Meadowvale, Ontario, Canada.
Dunn, E.H., Hussell, D.J.T. and Welsh, D.A.: 1999, 'Priority-setting tool applied to Canada's landbirds based on concern and responsibility for species', Conserv. Biol. 13, 1404-1415.
Freemark, K.E., Dunning, J.B., Hejl, S. and Probst, J.R.: 1995, 'A landscape ecology perspective for research, conservation, and management', in T.E. Martin and D.M. Finch (eds.), Ecology and Management of Neotropical Migratory Birds: A Synthesis and Review of Critical Issues, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 381-427.
Friesen, L.E., Eagles, P.F.J. and Mackay, R.J.: 1995, 'Effects of residential development on forestdwelling neotropical migrant songbirds', Conserv. Biol. 9, 1408-1414.
Greenwood, J.J.D., Baillie, S.R., Gregory, R.D., Peach, W.J. and Fuller, R.J.: 1994, 'Some new approaches to conservation monitoring of British breeding birds', Ibis. 137, S16-S28.
Heal, O.W.: 1991, 'The role of study sites in long-term ecological research: A UK experience', in P.G. Risser (ed.), Long-term Ecological Research: An International Perspective, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, pp. 23-44.
Herzog, F. and Lausch, A.: 2001, 'Supplementing land-use statistics with landscape metrics: some methodological considerations', Environ. Monit. Assess. 72, 37-50.
Innes, J.L.: 1995, 'Theoretical and practical criteria for the selection of ecosystem monitoring plots in Swiss forests', Environ. Monit. Assess. 36, 271-294.
Kilgo, J.C., Sargent, R.A., Miller, K.V. and Chapman, B.R.: 1997, 'Landscape influences on breeding bird communities in hardwood fragments in South Carolina', Wildl. Soc. Bull. 25, 878-885.
Lee, H., Bakowsky, W., Riley, J., Bowles, J., Puddister, M., Uhlig, P. and McMurray, S.: 1998, 'Ecological Land Classification for Southern Ontario: First Approximation and its Application,' SCSS Field Guide FG-02 Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Southcentral Science Section, Science Development and Transfer Branch, Ontario, Canada.
Ludwig, J.A., Bastin, G.N., Eager R.W., Karfs, R., Ketner, P. and Pearce, G.: 2000, 'Monitoring Australian rangelend sites using landscape function indicators and ground-and remotebased techniques', Environ. Monit. Assess. 64, 167-178.
Margules, C.R. and Nicholls, A.O.: 1988, 'Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity', Biol. Conserv. 43, 63-76.
Margules, C.R. and Usher, M.B.: 1981, 'Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: A review', Biol. Conserv. 21, 79-109.
Milne, R.J., Bennett, L. and Puddister, M.: 2000, 'Species of Conservation Concern' and their role in landscape assessment on the Central Niagara Escarpment', in S. Carty, S. Powell, M. Baran and R. Murzin (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference Leading Edge '99, Ministry of Natural Resources, Burlington, Ontario, Canada, October, 1999.
Noon, B.R.: 2003, 'Conceptual issues in monitoring ecological resources', in D.E. Busch and J.C. Trexler (eds.), Monitoring Ecosystems: Interdisciplinary Approaches for Evaluating Ecoregional Initiatives, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 27-71.
Prendergast, J.R., Quinn, R.M., Lawton, J.H., Eversham, B.C. and Gibbons, D.W.: 1993, 'Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies', Nature. 365, 335-337.
Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O.: 1989, 'Application of a numerical algorithm to the selection of reserves in semi-arid New South Wales', Biol. Conserv. 50, 263-278.
Robinson, S.K. and Wilcove, D.S.: 1994, 'Forest fragmentation in the temperate zone and its effects on migratory songbirds', Bird Conserv. Int. 4, 233-249.
Savory, A.: 1999, Holistic Management: A New Framework for Decision-making Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, p. 616.
Shochat, E., Abramsky, Z. and Pinshow, B.: 2001, 'Breeding bird species diversity in the Negev: effects of scrub fragmentation by planted forests', J. Appl. Ecol. 38, 1135-1147.
Sisk, T.D., Llauner, A.E., Switky, K.R. and Ehrlich, P.R.: 1994, 'Identifying extinction threats: Global analyses of the distribution of biodiversity and the expansion of the human enterprise', BioScience. 44, 592-604.
Smith, P.G.R. and Theberge, J.B.: 1986, 'A review of criteria for evaluating natural areas', Environ. Manage. 10, 15-734.
Smith, P.G.R. and Theberge, J.B.: 1987, 'Evaluating natural areas using multiple criteria: theory and practice', Environ. Manage. 11, 447-460.
Spellerberg, I.A.: 1992, Evaluation and Assessment for Conservation, Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, USA, p. 260.
Thomas, L.: 1996, 'Monitoring long-term population change: why are there so many analysis methods?', Ecology. 77, 49-58.
Turner, M.G., Wear, D.N. and Flamm, R.O.: 1996, 'Land ownership and land-cover change in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula', Ecol. Appl. 6, 1150-1172.
Vaughan, H., Brydges, T., Fenech, A. and Lumb, A.: 2001, 'Monitoring long-term ecological changes through the ecological monitoring and assessment network: science-based and policy relevant', Environ. Monit. Assess. 67, 3-28.
Walters, J.R.: 1998, 'The ecological basis of avian sensitivity to habitat fragmentation', in J.M. Marzluff and R. Sallabanks (eds.), Avian Conservation: Research and Management. Island Press, Washington DC, USA, pp. 181-192.
Wear, D.N., Turner, M.G. and Flamm, R.O.: 1996, 'Ecosystem management with multiple owners: landscape dynamics in a Southern Appalachian watershed,' Ecol. Appl. 6, 1173-1188.
WRC: 2000, Watershed Report Card Watershed Report Card Inc., Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bennett, L.P., Milne, R.J. Criteria to Assess and Select Sites for Long-Term Avian Monitoring in an Urbanizing Landscape. Environ Monit Assess 94, 147–162 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016885.00426.c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016885.00426.c0