Abstract
We examined regional conditions and trends related to quality of life and potential vulnerabilities of these factors to changes in the condition of natural resources in the Mid-Atlantic Region, USA. We selected a variety of variable on economic and socio-demographic conditions that demonstrate links between the condition of natural areas and human concerns and that quantify dependencies on resources. We extracted data from economic and population census databases for counties within the study area and present a subset of results of the cluster analyses used to describe condition and potential risks due to distinct combinations of variables.
We found that the same variables used to judge quality of life were often correlated with increasing population and thus were likely to be relate to land pressures and risks to natural resources. Within the region, economic dependence on resource-harvesting industries such as forestry and fisheries was low (less than 4% of total earnings at most), however, the potential for natural amenities to attract residents appeared to be growing as the self-employed and otherwise mobile people settled in areas with affordable housing and natural amenities. Suburban residential spread had been occurring in both the close-in and distant suburbs of the region's urban areas and some rural growth appeared to be driven, in part, by businesses migrating to suburbs. Further work is needed to tease apart causal factors for the trends we observed, but correlations clearly existed in some areas between increasing populations and quality of natural surroundings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abt, K.L., Winter, S.A. and Huggert, Jr., R.J.: 2002, 'Local Economic Impacts of Forests', The Southern Forest Resource Assessment Technical Report, General Technical Report SRS-53, Southern Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, Forest Services Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, p. 84.
Blomquist, G.C., Berger, M.C. and Hoehn, J.P.: 1988, 'New Estimates of Quality of Life in Urban Areas', Amer. Econ. Rev. 78 (1), 89-108.
Bradley, M.P. and Smith, E.R.: 2004, 'Using Science to Assess Environmental Vulnerabilities', Environ. Mont. Assess. 94, 1-7.
CEA: 1998, Changing America: Indicators of Social and Economic Well-Being by Race and Hispanic Origin, Council of Economic Advisors, President's Initiative on Race, Washington, DC, USA.
Cordell, H. K., McDonald, B.L., Briggs, J.A., Teasley, R.J., Biesterfeldt, R., Bergstrom, J. and Mou, S.H.: 1997, 'Emerging Markets for Outdoor Recreation in the United States', A Report to the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association and the Outdoor Products Council, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Forest Service, Recreation, Wilderness, Urban Forest and Demographic Trends Research Group, Athens, GA, USA, p. 183.
Crompton, John L., Love, L.L. and More, T.A.: 1997, 'An Empirical Study of the Role of Recreation, Parks and Open Space in Companies' (Re) Location Decisions', J. Park Recreation Admi. 15 (1), 37-58.
DellaSalla, D.A., Staus, N.L., Strittholt, J.R., Hackman, A. and Iacobelli, A.: 2001, 'An updated protected areas database for the United States and Canada', Nat. Areas J. 21, 124-135.
Gottlieb, P.D.: 1995, 'Residential Amenities, Firm Location and Economic Development', Urban Stud. 32 (9), 1413-36.
Inglehart, R. and Klingemann, H.D.: 2000, 'Genes, Culture, Democracy, and Happiness', Chapter 7 in E. Diener and E.M. Suh (eds.), Culture and Subjective Well-Being (Well Being and Quality of Life), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, p. 367.
Johnson, K. M. and Beale, C. L.: 1998, 'The Rural Rebound', Wilson Quarterly. 12 (Spring), 16-27.
King, D.M. and Cantrell, J.A.: 2002, 'Economic Development and Environmental Restoration in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands: A County-level Assessment of Economic Impacts From Restoration Spending', Canaan Valley Institute and King and Associates, Inc., Solomons, MD, USA, p. 63.
Leontief, W.W.: 1986, Input-Output Economics (2nd Edition) Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA.
Maxwell, B.A. and Buddemeier, R.W.: 2002, 'Coastal Typology Development with Heterogeneous Data Sets', Regional Environmental Change. 3 (1-3), 77-87.
McGranahan, D.A.: 1999, 'Natural Amenities Drive Rural Population Change', Agricultural Economic Report No. 781, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, USA, p. 32.
MIG: 2002, 'IMPLAN Professional™ v. 2.0.1019 and databases from most recent base-year 1999', Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Stillwater, MN, USA.
Power, T.M.: 1996, Lost Landscapes and Failed Economies: The Search for a Value of Place Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Reeder, R. J.: 1998, 'Retiree-Attraction Policies for Rural Development', Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 741, Food and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA, p. 48.
Roback, J.: 1982, 'Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life', J. Polit. Economy. 90 (6), 1257-78.
Sirgy, M. J.: 2001, Handbook of Quality-of-Life Research: An Ethical Marketing Perspective, Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA, USA, p. 458.
Trust for Public Land: “The economic benefits of parks and open space.” In Attracting Investment (1999). 26 June 2003. <http://www.tpl.org>
UNDP: 2002, Human Development Report 2002 Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, p. 260.
Veenhoven, R.: 1997, 'Advances in Understanding Happiness', Revue Québeçoise de Psychologies. 18, 29-74.
Wainger, L.A. and Price, E.W.: 2003, 'Socio-economic Aspects of Vulnerability to Changes in Ecosystems: Risk Profiles of Counties, Watersheds and EMAP Hexagons within the ReVA Region', U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Woods and Poole Economics, Inc.: 2002, 'Complete Economic and Demographic Data Source (CEDDS)', Washington, DC, USA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wainger, L.A., Price, E.W. Evaluating Quality of Life, Economic Vulnerabilities, and Drivers of Ecosystem Change. Environ Monit Assess 94, 69–84 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016880.31332.e1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000016880.31332.e1