Abstract
The Scandinavian wolverine is a predator that kills many reindeer belonging to the Sami, the indigenous population of northern Scandinavia. The wolverine is also an endangered species. Hunting is, therefore, illegal. The intended conservation is ineffective, however, due to poaching. In this paper we suggest a property rights regime for the protection of the endangered wolverine. We also want to contribute to a solution to a long-standing conflict between the urban South and the North of Sweden. General conditions essential for an efficient protection of endangered species by property rights are outlined. In the suggested regime Sami villages with reindeer herders as members become the owners of the wolverines. Reindeer breeding and wolverine protection thereby become joint operations. Remuneration for wolverine protection will be received from the Swedish State that pays for wolverines living in the grazing area. The system can presumably be financed by a redistribution of current subsidies to the Sami.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barbier, E. B., Burgess, J. C., Swanson, T. M. & Pearce, D. W. (1990). Elephants, Economics and Ivory, London: Earthscan.
Bouckaert, B. & Groosman, B. (1999). “Can Bartolus Save the Tiger? Reflections on the Use of Property Rights for Land-based Biodiversity Conservation.” In Verfassung und Recht ¨ Ubersee (eds.). Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 4, pp. 454–489.
Cooter,R & Ulen, Th. (2000). Law and Economics. 3rd edn., Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
De Alessi, M. (2000). “Private Conservation and Black Rhinos in Zimbabwe: The Save Valley and Bubiana Conservancies,” Center for Private Conservation, http://www.cei.org De 5 Stora, “Organisation for Research into Scandinavian Predators,” http://www.de5stora.com
Faure, M. & Skogh, G. (2003). The Economic Analysis of Environmental Policy and Law. An Introduction, Edward Elgar.
Johansson, S. & Lundgren, N.-G. (1998). “Vad kostar en ren?” Rapport till expertgruppen f¨ or studier i offentlig ekonomi, Ds 1998:8, Stockholm.
Mattson, L. (1990). “Hunting in Sweden: Extent, Economic Values and Structural Problems.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 5, 563–573.
McPherson, M. A. & Nieswiadomy, M. L. (2000). “African elephants: The Effect of Property Rights and Political Stability.” Contemporary Economic Policy. 18(1), 14–26.
Simmons, R. T. (1999). “The Endangered Species Act: Who's Saving What?” The Independent Review, III(3), 309–326.
SOU, (1999). Rovdjursutredningen. Norstedts Tryckeri AB. Stockholm, p. 146.
Sellenthin, M. O. & Skogh, G. (2001). Kan ¨ agander¨ att r¨ adda utrotningshotade djur? Exemplet den svenska j ¨ arven. Ekonomisk Debatt. 8, 559–564.
Swanson, Th. (1994). The International Regulation of Extinction, London: Macmillan.
Swanson, T. M. & Barbier, E. B. (1992). Economics for the Wilds: Wildlife, Wildlands, Diversity and Development, London: Earthscan.
Turner, R. K., Pearce, D. & Bateman, I. (1993). Environmental Economics: An Elementary Introduction, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sellenthin, M.O., Skogh, G. Property Rights in Endangered Species: The Wolverine Case . European Journal of Law and Economics 18, 239–247 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJLE.0000045084.43048.12
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJLE.0000045084.43048.12