Abstract
We compared the information experience of women invited to attend cervical screening for the first time in 1994 and 2001 using postal questionnaires. Compared to 1994, women in 2001: found the invitation letter less easy to understand; were not aware of alternative venues for the test; and waited >4 weeks before receiving their results. Negative information experiences may influence attendance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austoker J, Davey C, Jansen C. Improving the quality of the written information sent to women about cervical screening Sheffield: NHSCSP Publications, 1997.
Summers A, Fullard B. Improving the coverage and quality of cervical screening: Women 's views. J Public Health Med 1995; 17: 277–281.
Foxwell M, Alder E. More information equates with less anxiety. Prof Nurse 1993; 9: 32–36.
Department of Health. The NHS Cancer Plan. London: Department of Health,2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duggal, H.V., Olowokure, B., Caswell, M. et al. Comparing the Information Experience of Women Invited for Cervical Screening for the First Time in 1994 with 2001. Eur J Epidemiol 19, 433–435 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000027351.18118.7c
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000027351.18118.7c