Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing the Information Experience of Women Invited for Cervical Screening for the First Time in 1994 with 2001

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the information experience of women invited to attend cervical screening for the first time in 1994 and 2001 using postal questionnaires. Compared to 1994, women in 2001: found the invitation letter less easy to understand; were not aware of alternative venues for the test; and waited >4 weeks before receiving their results. Negative information experiences may influence attendance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Austoker J, Davey C, Jansen C. Improving the quality of the written information sent to women about cervical screening Sheffield: NHSCSP Publications, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Summers A, Fullard B. Improving the coverage and quality of cervical screening: Women 's views. J Public Health Med 1995; 17: 277–281.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foxwell M, Alder E. More information equates with less anxiety. Prof Nurse 1993; 9: 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Department of Health. The NHS Cancer Plan. London: Department of Health,2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duggal, H.V., Olowokure, B., Caswell, M. et al. Comparing the Information Experience of Women Invited for Cervical Screening for the First Time in 1994 with 2001. Eur J Epidemiol 19, 433–435 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000027351.18118.7c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000027351.18118.7c

Navigation