Skip to main content
Log in

Toxicity Reduction Evaluation, Toxicity Identification Evaluation and Toxicity Tracking in Direct Toxicity Assessment

  • Published:
Ecotoxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Toxicity reduction evaluations (TREs) in the River Esk and Lower Tees Estuary were based on the approach described by USEPA, but adapted to tackle the specific problems of the two sites. A combination of toxicity tracking and toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) was used at both locations to enhance the understanding of source and type of toxicants present. The assessment of toxicity at Langholm focussed on pesticides present in the sewerage network. The TIE programme indicated that the most likely toxic agents within the effluent were the organophosphate pesticides diazinon and to lesser extent propetamphos, although these did not account for all of the observed toxicity. The exact source of these toxicants was not clear although toxicity tracking identified two potential candidates. The TRE undertaken on the discharge to the lower Tees utilised high-throughput methods with standard test organisms to generate toxicity information throughout a complex sewerage network. The toxicity tracking information was used in conjunction with TIEs to identify a number of key sources of toxicity. Substantial toxicity was associated with a currently untreated industrial effluent. Chemical analysis and TIE highlighted cyanide as the likely toxicant in this effluent and its possible significance in the final discharge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amato, J.R., Mount, D.I., Durhan, E.J., Lukasewycz, M.T., Ankley, G.T. and Robert, E.D. (1992). An example of the identification of diazinon as a primary toxicant in an effluent. Environ. Toxico. Chem. 11, 209–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amodei, M. and Azzoni, R. (1991). Use of Daphnia magna in detecting drinking water emergencies. Quad. Ist. Ric. Acque. 93, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • APEM (1997). The Impact of Langholm Effluent Treatment Works Discharge on the Fish Populations of the River Border Esk. Aquatic Pollution and Environmental Management, Report 445/DC-H/esl. London, UK.

  • ENTEC (1996). UK DTA Demonstration Programme Phase 1: Project Plan-River Esk. ENTEC Report No. 98025. London, UK.

  • Environment Agency (1997). Study to Determine the Toxicity of Mixtures of Chlorfenviphos, Diazinon and Propetamphos to Juvenile (<24 hour Old) Daphnia magna after a 48 hour Period. R&D Technical Report G14. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen, P., Thain, J.E., Law R. and Fileman, T.W. (1993). Attempts to assess the environmental hazard posed by complex mixtures of organic chemicals in UK estuaries. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 26, 90–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount, D.I. and Anderson-Carnahan, D.M. (1988). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations. Phase I. Toxicity Characterisation Procedures. EPA/600/3-88/034. US EPA, Duluth, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmel, S.C., Garnas, R.L., Patrick, J.M. Jr. and Moore, J.C. (1983). Acute toxicity, bioconcentration, and persistence of AC 222,705, benthiocarb, chlorpyrifos, fenvalerate, methyl parathion, and permethrin in the estuarine environment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31, 104–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • UKWIR (2000a). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Lower Tees Estuary Project Part I. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/03. London, UK.

  • UKWIR (2000b). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Lower Tees Estuary Project Part II (2000). Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/04. London, UK.

  • UKWIR (2000c). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Review of Toxicity Reduction Evaluations at Sewage Treatment Works. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/05. London, UK.

  • UKWIR (2000d). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: River Esk Project. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/02. London, UK.

  • UKWIR (2000e). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Technical Guidance. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/07. London, UK.

  • US EPA (1991). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase I Toxicity Characterisation Procedures. EPA ReportEPA-600/6-91/003.USEPA, Duluth,MN,USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1993a). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase II Toxicity Characterisation Procedures for Acutely and Chronically Toxic Samples. EPA Report EPA-600/R-92/080. US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1993b). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase III Toxicity Characterisation Procedures for Acutely and Chronically Toxic Samples. EPA Report EPA-600/R-92/081. US EPA, Duluth, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1999). Toxicity Reduction Evaluation Guidance for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plans. Office of Wastewater Management. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hutchings, M., Johnson, I., Hayes, E. et al. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation, Toxicity Identification Evaluation and Toxicity Tracking in Direct Toxicity Assessment. Ecotoxicology 13, 475–484 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECTX.0000035297.90620.73

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECTX.0000035297.90620.73

Navigation