Abstract
Toxicity reduction evaluations (TREs) in the River Esk and Lower Tees Estuary were based on the approach described by USEPA, but adapted to tackle the specific problems of the two sites. A combination of toxicity tracking and toxicity identification evaluation (TIE) was used at both locations to enhance the understanding of source and type of toxicants present. The assessment of toxicity at Langholm focussed on pesticides present in the sewerage network. The TIE programme indicated that the most likely toxic agents within the effluent were the organophosphate pesticides diazinon and to lesser extent propetamphos, although these did not account for all of the observed toxicity. The exact source of these toxicants was not clear although toxicity tracking identified two potential candidates. The TRE undertaken on the discharge to the lower Tees utilised high-throughput methods with standard test organisms to generate toxicity information throughout a complex sewerage network. The toxicity tracking information was used in conjunction with TIEs to identify a number of key sources of toxicity. Substantial toxicity was associated with a currently untreated industrial effluent. Chemical analysis and TIE highlighted cyanide as the likely toxicant in this effluent and its possible significance in the final discharge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amato, J.R., Mount, D.I., Durhan, E.J., Lukasewycz, M.T., Ankley, G.T. and Robert, E.D. (1992). An example of the identification of diazinon as a primary toxicant in an effluent. Environ. Toxico. Chem. 11, 209–16.
Amodei, M. and Azzoni, R. (1991). Use of Daphnia magna in detecting drinking water emergencies. Quad. Ist. Ric. Acque. 93, 1–10.
APEM (1997). The Impact of Langholm Effluent Treatment Works Discharge on the Fish Populations of the River Border Esk. Aquatic Pollution and Environmental Management, Report 445/DC-H/esl. London, UK.
ENTEC (1996). UK DTA Demonstration Programme Phase 1: Project Plan-River Esk. ENTEC Report No. 98025. London, UK.
Environment Agency (1997). Study to Determine the Toxicity of Mixtures of Chlorfenviphos, Diazinon and Propetamphos to Juvenile (<24 hour Old) Daphnia magna after a 48 hour Period. R&D Technical Report G14. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.
Matthiessen, P., Thain, J.E., Law R. and Fileman, T.W. (1993). Attempts to assess the environmental hazard posed by complex mixtures of organic chemicals in UK estuaries. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 26, 90–5.
Mount, D.I. and Anderson-Carnahan, D.M. (1988). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations. Phase I. Toxicity Characterisation Procedures. EPA/600/3-88/034. US EPA, Duluth, MN, USA.
Schimmel, S.C., Garnas, R.L., Patrick, J.M. Jr. and Moore, J.C. (1983). Acute toxicity, bioconcentration, and persistence of AC 222,705, benthiocarb, chlorpyrifos, fenvalerate, methyl parathion, and permethrin in the estuarine environment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31, 104–13.
UKWIR (2000a). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Lower Tees Estuary Project Part I. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/03. London, UK.
UKWIR (2000b). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Lower Tees Estuary Project Part II (2000). Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/04. London, UK.
UKWIR (2000c). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Review of Toxicity Reduction Evaluations at Sewage Treatment Works. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/05. London, UK.
UKWIR (2000d). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: River Esk Project. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/02. London, UK.
UKWIR (2000e). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Technical Guidance. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/07. London, UK.
US EPA (1991). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase I Toxicity Characterisation Procedures. EPA ReportEPA-600/6-91/003.USEPA, Duluth,MN,USA.
US EPA (1993a). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase II Toxicity Characterisation Procedures for Acutely and Chronically Toxic Samples. EPA Report EPA-600/R-92/080. US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN, USA.
US EPA (1993b). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase III Toxicity Characterisation Procedures for Acutely and Chronically Toxic Samples. EPA Report EPA-600/R-92/081. US EPA, Duluth, MN, USA.
US EPA (1999). Toxicity Reduction Evaluation Guidance for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plans. Office of Wastewater Management. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hutchings, M., Johnson, I., Hayes, E. et al. Toxicity Reduction Evaluation, Toxicity Identification Evaluation and Toxicity Tracking in Direct Toxicity Assessment. Ecotoxicology 13, 475–484 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECTX.0000035297.90620.73
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECTX.0000035297.90620.73