Abstract
Legislation designed to regulate effluent discharges is expressed in terms of minimising the risk of harm of that discharge to the environment. Practical implementation is usually based on the control and measurement of a limited number of individual chemicals. However, this is not always effective because of the complex nature of some discharges or the lack of data for some chemicals, preventing the definition of acceptable levels in the environment. Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) clearly has a role in such circumstances because it avoids the need for a comprehensive chemical characterisation of effluent discharges. Several scenarios in which DTA can play a useful role in water quality management under current legislation have been identified. A ‘generic’ framework for the implementation of bioassays for effluent control is proposed. This provides a number of options in terms of the level of environmental protection afforded and the ‘starting point’ for a DTA programme (i.e. whether it is based on local measurable impacts on water quality or directed from the outset towards the risk assessment of particular discharges). A DTA programme can be developed that meets both the technical and regulatory requirements of these different scenarios. Guidance on the design of such programmes for different scenarios is provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chapman, P.M. (2000). Whole effluent toxicity testing-usefulness, level of protection and risk assessment. Environ.Toxicol. Chem. 19, 3–13.
EEC (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy.OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, pp. 1–51.
La Point, T.W. and Waller W.T. (2000). Field assessments in conjunction with whole effluent toxicity testing. Environ.Toxicol. Chem. 19, 14–24.
Maltby, L., Clayton, S.A., Yu, H., McLoughlin, R.M., Wood D. and Yin D. (2000). Using single species toxicity tests, community-level responses and Toxicity Identification Evaluations to investigate effluent impacts. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19, 151–157.
Scroggins, R.P., Miller, J.A., Borgmann, A.I. and Sprague, J.B. (2002a). Sublethal toxicity findings by the pulp and paper industry for cycles 1 and 2 of the Environmental Effects Monitoring Program. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 37, 21–48.
Scroggins, R.P., Van Aggelan, G. and Schroeder, J. (2002b).Monitoring sub-lethal toxicity in effluent under the metal mining EEM Program. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 37, 279–294.
UKWIR (2001). Technical Guidance for the Implementation of Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) for effluent control: addressing water quality problems in catchments where acute toxicity is an issue. Technical Report TX02B 217.
USEPA (1994). Short-term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluent and Receiving Waters to Marine and Estuarine Organisms, 2nd edn. EPA 600/4-91/003.
Wharfe, J.R. (1996). Toxicity based criteria for the regulatory control of waste discharges and for environmental monitoring and assessment in the United Kingdom.In J.F. Tapp, J.R. Wharfe and S.M. Hunt (eds).Toxic Impacts of Wastes on the Aquatic Environment RSC.
Whitehouse, P. (2000). Measures for protecting water quality: current approaches and future developments. Ecotoxicol.Environ. Saf. 50, 115–26.
Zabel, T.F. (1996) European Experience for Water Quality Standards and Objectives. Water Quality Standards and Objectives Study Task Force, Golitsyno, Russia, July 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitehouse, P., Johnson, I., Forrow, D.M. et al. A Regulatory Framework for Controlling Effluent Discharges Using Toxicity Testing in The UK. Ecotoxicology 13, 399–411 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECTX.0000035291.26129.0e
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECTX.0000035291.26129.0e