Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal Recycling System Design: With an Application to Sophisticated Packaging Tools

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the mathematical analysis of product-process chains, aimed at the proper design of recycling systems. A modelling method is presented that can be applied to various chains. It is applied to a case in which a producer of sophisticated packaging tools requires insight into the many options of the design of a reuse/recycling chain. This is due to expectations for the near future that are related to extended product responsibility and the enforcement of recycling. Depending on the weight of different criteria and the choice of systems boundaries, optimal solutions can be selected. It turns out that the modelling method acts as a useful decision tool. A major bottleneck is the availability of data from suppliers and customers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, J.H. (1993), In Defence of Garbage. Westport Connecticut: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. and S. Anderson (1998), ‘Implications of the PackagingWaste Regulations’, Logistics focus 6(5), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R.A. and L.W. Ayres (1996), Industrial Ecology: Towards Closing the Materials Cycle. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azapagic, A. and R. Clift (1995), ‘Life Cycle Assessment and Linear Programming-Environmental Optimisation of Product System’, Computers and Chemical Engineering 19, S229–S234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, I.G. (1999), ‘Competition, Sustainability and Packaging Policy in the UK’, J. of Environmental Planning & Management 42(1), 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisschop, J. and R. Entriken (1993), AIMMS: The Modelling System. Haarlem, (NL): Paragon Decision Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M., M. Salomon and L.N. van Wassenhove (1994), ‘On the Coordination of Product and By-product Flows in Two-level Distribution Networks: Model Formulations and Solution Procedures’, European Journal of Operational Research 79(2), 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M., L.N. van Wassenhove, H.L. Gabel and P.M.Weaver (1996), ‘An Environmental Life Cycle Optimization Model for the European Pulp and Paper Industry’, Omega 24(6), 615–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C.R. and L.M. Ellram (1998), ‘Reverse Logistics: A Review of the Literature and Framework for Future Investigation’, Journal of Business Logistics 19(1), 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, M., J.M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard, R. Dekker, E. van der Laan, J.A.E.E. van Nunen and L.N. van Wassenhove (1997), ‘Quantitative Models for Reverse Logistics: A Review’, European Journal of Operational Research 103(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, M, H.R. Krikke, R. Dekker and S.D.P. Flapper (2000), ‘A Characterisation of Logistics Networks for Product Recovery’, Omega 28(6), 653–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenz, W. (1996), Verordnungen zum Kreislaufwirtschafts-und Abfallgesetz: Textausgabe und Kommentar. Köln: Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop, M. and R. Spriensma (2000), The Eco-indicator 99: A Damage Oriented Method for Tife Cycle Impact Assessment. Report. Den Haag NL:Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and the Environment. Electronic version: http://www.pre.nl

  • Graedel, T.E. and B.R. Allenby (1995), Industrial Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée, J.B., H.A. Udo de Haes and G. Huppes (1993a), ‘Quantitative Life Cycle Assessment of Products, Part 1: Goal Definition and Inventory’, Journal of Cleaner Production 1(1), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée, J.B., R. Heijungs, H.A. Udo de Haes and G. Huppes (1993b), ‘Quantitative Life Cycle Assessment of Products, Part 2: Classification, Validation and Improvement Analysis’, Journal of Cleaner Production 1(2), 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.L. (1997), ‘Beyond Greening: Strategies for a Sustainable World’, Harvard Business review 75(1), 66–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshino, T., K. Yura and K. Hitomi (1995), ‘Optimisation Analysis for Recycle-oriented Manufacturing Systems’, International Journal of Production Research 33(8), 2069–2078.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFIAS (1973), Report of the International Federation of Institutes for Advanced Study Workshop no. 6 on Energy Analysis, Guldsmedshyttan (S): IFIAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandelaars, P.P.A.A.H. and J.C.J.M. Van den Bergh (1997), ‘Dynamic Analysis ofMaterials-product Chains: An Application to Window Frames’, Ecological Economics 22(1), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krikke, H.R. (1998), Recovery Strategies and Reverse Logistic Network Design, Ph.D.-Thesis. Enschede (NL): Twente University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krikke, H.R., A. Van Harten and P.C. Schuur (1998), ‘On a Medium Term Product Recovery and Disposal Strategy for Durable Assembly Products’, International Journal of Production Research 36(1), 111–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, A.J.D. (1999), ‘Linear Programming in Disassembly/clustering Sequence Generation’, Computers and Industrial Engineering 36(4), 723–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, M. (1993), Integrating Economics, Ecology and Thermodynamics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (1999), ‘Packaging Regulations Review’, Logistics Focus 7(3), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahel, W.R. (1994), ‘The Utilisation-focused Service Economy: Resource Efficiency and Productlife Extension’, in B.R. Allenby and D.J. Richards, eds., The Greening of Industrial Ecosystems. Washington DC: National Academic Press, pp. 178–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starreveld, P.F. and E.C. van Ierland (1994), ‘Recycling of Plastics: A Materials Balance Optimisation Model’, Environmental and Resource Economics 4, 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thierry, M., M. Salomon, J. van Nunen and L. van Wassenhove (1995), ‘Strategic Issues in Product Recovery Management’, Californian Management Rev. 37(2), 114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman, A.-M., T. Ekvall, H. Baumann and T. Rydberg (1994), ‘Choice of System Boundaries in Life Cycle Assessment’, Journal of Cleaner Production 2(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veroutis, A.D. and J.A. Fava (1997), ‘Elements of Effective DFA Program Management and Product Stewardship’, Environmental Quality Management 7(1), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilck, J. (1997), ‘Responsible Care Makes Global Moves’, Chemical Market Reporter 252(2), SR 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    A.J.D. Lambert, H.M. Boelaarts & M.A.M. Splinter

Authors
  1. A.J.D. Lambert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H.M. Boelaarts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M.A.M. Splinter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A.J.D. Lambert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lambert, A., Boelaarts, H. & Splinter, M. Optimal Recycling System Design: With an Application to Sophisticated Packaging Tools. Environmental and Resource Economics 28, 273–299 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000031055.71080.46

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000031055.71080.46

Search

Navigation