Skip to main content
Log in

Growth, Environment and Uncertain Future Preferences

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The attitude of future generations towards environmental assets may well be different from ours, and it is necessary to take into account thispossibility explicitly in the current debate about environmental policy. The question we are addressing here is: should uncertainty about futurepreferences lead to a more conservative attitude towards environment?Previous literature shows that it is the case when society expects that onaverage future preferences will be more in favor of environment than ours,but this result relies heavily on the assumption of a separability betweenconsumption and environmental quality in the utility function. We show thatthings are less simple when preferences are non-separable: the attitude ofthe society now depends not only on the expectation of the change inpreferences but also on the characteristics of the economy (impatience,intertemporal flexibility, natural capacities of regeneration of theenvironment, relative preference for the environment), on its history(initial level of the environmental quality) and on the date at whichpreferences are expected to change (near or far future).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayong Le Kama, A. (2001), ‘Preservation and Uncertain Future Preferences’, Economic Theory 8(3), 745–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltratti, A. (1996), Models of Economic Growth with Environmental Assets. Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei series on Economics, Energy and Environment, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltratti, A. G., G. Chichilnisky and G. M. Heal (1993), Preservation, Uncertain Future Preferences and Irreversibility. Nota di Lavoro 59.93, Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, Milan, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltratti, A. G., G. Chichilnisky and G. M. Heal (1998), ‘Uncertain Future Preferences and Conservation’, in G. Chichilnisky and G. M. Heal, eds., Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncertainty.

  • Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei series on Economics, Energy and Environment, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Brasão, A. and M. Cunha-e-Sâ (1998), Optimal Growth, Uncertain Future Preferences and Preservation.

  • Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Faculdade de Economia. Paper presented at the First World Congress, EARE/EAERE, Venice, June 25-27.

  • Dasgupta, P. S. and G. M. Heal (1974), ‘The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources’, Review of Economic Studies, Symposium Issue, 3-28.

  • Heal G. and B. Kriström (2002), ‘Uncertainty and Climate Change’, Environmental and Resource Economics 22(1-2), 3–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, P. and G. Rotillon (1996), ‘Desutility of Pollution and Endogenous Growth’, Environmental and Resource Economics 6, 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smulders, S. and R. Gradus (1996), ‘Pollution Abatement and Long-term Growth’, European Journal of Political Economy 12, 505–532.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katheline Schubert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Le Kama, A.A., Schubert, K. Growth, Environment and Uncertain Future Preferences. Environmental and Resource Economics 28, 31–53 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000023820.15522.a4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000023820.15522.a4

Navigation