Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Involved in the Implementation of Pedagogical Innovations Using Technology

  • Published:
Education and Information Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the factors involved in successful implementation of innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in ten Israeli schools. The research questions addressed are:

1. What is the configuration and intensity level of the various factors involved in the implementation of innovative pedagogical practices using ICT in schools?

2. Can a connection be identified between the level of intensity of the different factors affecting the innovation and the level of change in various domains of innovation (e.g., teacher role, student role, curriculum, and time and space configurations)?

Data from ten case studies in Israeli schools were analyzed using the framework developed to measure the intensity of the factors involved in the innovation. Infrastructure, factors within the school, school climate and educational policy were found to be the most involved categories. These factors mostly affect aspects of the innovation related to teacher roles, instructional contents and teaching methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berman, P. and McLaughlin, M. (1974) Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. I: A Model of Educational Change. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, P. and McLaughlin, M. (1977) Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change. Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1999) The lure of curricular reform and its pitiful history. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(5), 182–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crofton, C. (1981) Planned Change in the Educational Environment. Unpublished report. Educational Testing Service, Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECS: Education Commission of the States (1999) Comprehensive School Reform: Five Lessons from the Field. Denver, Colorado.

  • Fullan, M. (1998) Leadership for the 21st century: Breaking the bonds of dependency. Educational Leadership, 55(7), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2001) The New Meaning of Educational Change, 3rd edition. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibton, D. (2001) Once the government provided education. Now it provides information on education: Insights from what UK headteachers think of Educational Law regarding decentralization policy, self-management and autonomy. In The Annual Conference of the British Educational Management and Administration Society (BEMAS), October 5–7, Newport-Pagnell, UK.

  • Goodlad, J. (1991) Why we need a complete redesign of teacher education. Educational Leadership, 49, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, G. E. and Hord, S. M. (1987) Changing in Schools. University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsler, K. and Gamble, M. (2002) Reforming Schools. Continuum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. (2000) Qualitative Studies of Innovative Pedagogical Practices Using Technology. SITES M2 design document, IEA.

  • Kozma, R. (ed.) (2003) Technology, Innovation and Educational Change – A Global Perspective. ISTE Publications, Eugene, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, C. (1977) The Socialization of Teachers. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975) Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malouf, D. and Schiller, E. (1995) Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. D. (2001) Educational leadership for the twenty-first century: Integrating three essential perspectives. In: Jossey-Bass Reader on Educational Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W. (1991) The rand change agent study: Ten years later. In Education Policy Implementation, A. R. Odden (ed.). State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, D. (1995) The Power of Their Ideas. Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Tubin, D., and Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2003) Analysis schema for the study of domains and levels of pedagogical innovation in schools using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 8(1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD/CERI (2000) Schooling for Tomorrow, Methodology for Case Studies of Organizational Change. OECD.

  • Pelgrum, W. and Anderson, R. (eds.) (1999) ICT and the Emerging Paradigm for Life Long Learning: Worldeide Educational Assessment of Infrastructure, Coals and Practices. IEA and the University of Twente, Enshede, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989) Teacher's Workplace: The Social Organization of Schools. Longman, White Plains, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1993) The Case for Change: Rethinking the Preparation of Educators. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheurich, J. J. and Fuller, E. (1995) Is Systematic Reform the answer for schools and science education? Cautions from the fields. Theory into Practice, 34(1), 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, T. (1993) Horace's School: Redesigning the American High School. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D. and Cuban, L. (1995) Tinkering Toward Utopia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubin, D. and Chen, D. (2002) School-based staff development for teaching within computerized learning envi-ronments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubin, D., Nachmias, R., Mioduser, D., and Forkosh-Baruch, A. (2003) Domains and levels of pedagogical innovation in schools using ICT: Ten innovative schools in Israel. Education and Information Technologies, 8(2), 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, J. and Underwood, G. (1990) Computers and Learning: Helping Children Acquire Thinking Skills. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venezky, R. L. (2001) Procedures for evaluation the impact of complex educational interventions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10(1), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2649_33723_1_119832_1_1_1,00.html

  • Yin, R. K. (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Method. Sage Publication, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nachmias, R., Mioduser, D., Cohen, A. et al. Factors Involved in the Implementation of Pedagogical Innovations Using Technology. Education and Information Technologies 9, 291–308 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000042045.12692.49

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000042045.12692.49

Navigation