Abstract
This presentation compares how lectures are being performed in different technological contexts: that of the studio, for taping of videotapes, or in front of a camera for the purpose of videoconferencing, or, for a live presentation. The different contexts will be described according to the communication theory of the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann, and contrasted with findings from contemporary research on lecturing and teacher–student interaction. The comparison between the videotaped lecture and the live lecture reveals important differences as to style of communication. The taped lectures are more stringent and content-oriented, while the live-lectures are time-consuming and more focused on establishing dialogues with students. Videoconference-lecturing contains features that place it between the live- and videotaped lecture. This paper concludes that videoconferencing is problematic with serious problems to handle for students and teachers alike.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apel, H. J. (1999) Das Abenteuer auf dem Katheder. Zur Vorlesung als rhetorische Lehrform. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 45, 61–79.
Armstrong-Sassen, M., Lundstrom, M., and Lumpkin, R. (1998) Student's reactions to the introduction of videoconferencing for classroom instruction. The Information Society, 14, 153–164.
Bauer, M. W. and Gaskell, G. (eds.). (2000) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. A Practical Handbook. Sage Publications, London.
Bligh, D. A. (2000) What's the Use of Lectures? Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Bolter, J. D. and Grusin, R. (2001) Remediation. Understanding New Media. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bronson, D. B. (1977) Toward a communication theory of teaching. Teachers College Record, 78, 447–456; http://www.tcrecord.org (ID Number: 1211, Accessed: 3/14/0).
Carpenter, E. (1995) The new languages. In Communication in History. Technology, Culture, Society, D. Crowley, and P. Heyer (eds.). Longman, White Plains, NY, pp. 266–271.
Entwistle, N. (1981) Styles of Learning and Teaching: An Integrated Outline of Educational Psychology for Students, Teachers, and Lecturers. Wiley, Chichester.
Fillion, G., Limayem, M., and Bouchard, L. (1999) Videoconferencing in distance education: A study of student perceptions in the lecture context. Innovations in Education and Training International, 36, 302–319.
Frymier, A. B. (1994) A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133–144.
Gunawardena, C. N. (1991) Current trends in the use of communications technologies for delivering distance education. International Journal of Instructional Media, 18, 201–214.
Haecker, D. (1969) Kritische Betrachtungen zur Vorlesung. Didacta, 4, 261–271.
Handal, G. (1973) Læremidlenes funksjon i undervisningen. In Universitetsundervisning, G. Handal, L.-G. Holmstrøm, and O. B. Thomsen (eds.). Studentlitteratur, Malmø, pp. 275–299.
Handal, G. (1984) Hva er fagdidaktikk. Norsk pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 68, 59–63. Kelly, N. and Kelly, B. (1982). Backgrounds, education, and teaching styles of teaching award winning professors. Unpublished paper. ERIC No. Ed230080.
Kneer, G. and Nassehi, A. (2000) Niklas Luhmann – Intrduktion til teorien om sociale systemer. Hans Reitzels forlag, København.
Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Luhmann, N. (1999) Tillid: En Mekanisme Til Reduktion af Social Kompleksitet. Hans Reitzels forlag, København.
Luhmann, N. (2000) Sociale Systemer – Grundrids Til en Almen Teori. Hans Reitzels forlag, København.
Martin, M. M., Mottet, T. P., and Myers, S. A. (1999) The relationships between students' motives for communicating with their instructors and affective and cognitive learning. Research report. ERIC: ED 437 692.
McKeachie, W. (1990) Research on college teaching: The historical background. Educational Psychology, 82, 189–200.
McKeachie, W. (1994) Teaching Tips (9th edition). D. C. Heath and Co, Lexington, MA.
Mottet, T. P. (2000) Interactive television instructor's perceptions of students' nonverbal responsiveness and their influence on distance teaching. Communication Education, 49, 146–164.
Mottet, T. P. and Beebe, S. A. (2000) Emotional contagion in the classroom: An examination of how teacher and student emotions are related. Paper presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the National Communication Association, Seattle, WA (November 9–12, 2000). ERIC: ED 447 522.
Mulkay, M. (1988) On Humor. Polity Press, Cambridge. Nussbaum, J. F. (1992) Effective teacher behaviours. Communication Education, 41, 167–180.
O'Donnel, A. and Danserau, D. (1994) Learning from lectures: Effects of cooperative review. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 116–125.
Penner, J. (1984) Why Many College Teachers Cannot Lecture. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
Rasmussen, J. (1997) Socialisering og læring i det refleksivt moderne. Unge pædagogers serie B 62, København, Unge Pædagoger.
Rose, D. (2000) Analysis of moving images. In Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. A Practical Handbook, M. W. Bauer and G. Gaskell (eds.). Sage Publications, London, pp. 24–262.
Saba, F. (2000) Research in distance education: A status report. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Education, 1; http://www.icaap.org/iuicode?149 (Retrieved 01/01/03).
Saroyan, A. and Snell, L. S. (1997) Variations in lecturing styles. Higher Education, 33, 85–104.
Schramm, W. (1962) What we know about learning from instructional television. In Educational Television: The Next Ten Years. The Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Vanderstraeten, R. (2000) Luhmann on socialization and education. Educational Theory, 50, 1–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fritze, Y., Nordkvelle, Y.T. Comparing Lectures: Effects of the Technological Context of the Studio. Education and Information Technologies 8, 327–343 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000008675.12095.7a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EAIT.0000008675.12095.7a