Skip to main content

Teamware: An Evaluation of Key Technologies and Open Problems

Abstract

Tools and technologies aiming to support electronic teamwork are constantly improving. However, the landscape of supporting technologies and tools is fragmented, and comprehensive solutions that fully realize the promises of electronic collaboration remain an elusive goal. In this paper, we describe and relate the capabilities of workflow systems, groupware tools, and content management system by introducing a framework that provides common concepts and reference architectures. To evaluate these technologies from the perspective of teamwork and collaboration, we discuss the requirements of a specific application domain and describe which requirements each of these technologies can address. In addition, we identify currently unsupported requirements and propose corresponding areas for additional research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Action Technologies, Action Works, http://www.actiontech.com/, 2003.

  2. D. Baker, D. Georgakopoulos, H. Schuster, A. Cassandra, and A. Cichocki, “Providing customized process and situation awareness in the collaboration management infrastructure,” in Proc. 4th IFCIS Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS'99), Edinburgh, Scotland, 1999.

  3. D. Baker, D. Georgakopoulos, H. Schuster, and A. Cichocki, “Awareness provisioning in collaboration management,” in International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, vol. 11, no. 1/2, 2002.

  4. BEA: WebLogic Integrator, http://www.bea.com/, 2003.

  5. D. Black, Workflow Software: A Layman's Handbook, Part I, INFORM, April 1994.

  6. D. Bogia and S.M. Kaplan, “Flexibility and control for dynamic workflows in the worlds environment,” in ACM Conf. on Organizational Computing Systems, 1995.

  7. T. Brinck and S.E. McDaniel, “CHI 97 workshop on awareness in collaborative systems,” in Proc. of CHI'97: Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1997.

  8. BroadVision: One-To-One Publishing, http://www.broadvision.com/, 2003.

  9. T. Bruce, Designing Quality Databases with IDEFIX Information models, Dorset House Publishing, 1992.

  10. BSCW, http://bscw.gmd.de/, 2003.

  11. F. Casati, S. Ceri, B. Pernici, and G. Pozzi,“Workflowevolution,” in Proc. 15th Conf. on Conceptual Modeling (ER'96), 1996.

  12. A.R. Cassandra, D. Baker, and M. Rashid, “CEDMOS complex event detection and monitoring system,” MCC Technical Report CEDMOS-002-99, Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, 1999.

  13. CISCO: Softswitch, http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vcallcon/index.html, 2003.

  14. COSA Solutions: COSA product suite, http://www.cosa.de/, 2003.

  15. T. Davenport, Process Innovation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Documentum: Documentum CME, http://www.documentum.com/, 2003.

  17. P. Dourish, S. Bly, “Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group,” in CHI'92 Conf. Proc.: Human Factors in Computer Systems, 1992.

  18. C. Ellis and C. Maltzahn, “The chautauqua workflow system,” in 30th Hawaii Int Conf. on System Sciences, 1997.

  19. FatWire: Content Server, http://www.fatwire.com/, 2003.

  20. FileNet: Content and Workflow Managers, http://www.filenet.com/, 2003.

  21. D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, and F. Manola, “Customizing transaction models and mechanisms in a programmable environment supporting reliable workflow automation,” IEEE Transactions on Data and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 8, no. 4, 1996.

  22. D. Georgakopoulos, M. Hornick, and A. Sheth, “An overview management: From process modeling to work-flow automation infrastructure distributed and parallel databases,” An International Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, 1995.

  23. D. Georgakopoulos, H. Schuster, A. Cichocki, and D. Baker, “Collaboration management infrastructure in crisis response situations,” in Proc. 16th Int. Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'2000), San Diego, 2000.

  24. C. Godart, O. Perrin, and H. Skaf, “Coo: A workflow operator to improve cooperation modeling in virtual processes,” in Proc. 9th Int. Workshop on Research Issues on Data Engineering Information Technology for Virtual Enterprises (RIDE-VE'99), 1999.

  25. J. Gray and J. Edwards, “Scale up with TP monitors,” in Byte, April 1995.

  26. Groove, http://www.groove.net/, 2001.

  27. C. Gutwin, S. Greenberg, and M. Roseman,“Workspace awareness in real-time distributed droupware: Framework, widgets, and evaluation,” People and Computers (Proc. of HCI'96), 1996.

  28. M. Hammer and J. Champy, Reengineering the Corporation, Harper Business: New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Han, A. Sheth, and C. Bußler, A Taxonomy of Adaptive Workflow Management.

  30. P. Heinl, S. Horn, S. Jablonski, J. Neeb, K. Stein, and M. Teschke, “A comprehensive approach to flexibility in workflow management systems,” in Proc. of the Int. Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration (WACC'99), San Francisco, 1999.

  31. Hewlett Packard: Process Manager, http://www.ice.hp.com, 2003.

  32. D. Hollingsworth, The Workflow Reference Model. Workflow Management Coalition, Document Number TC00-1003, 1994.

  33. IBM: WebSphere Business Integration Modeler (Holosofx), 2003, http://www-3.ibm.com/software/ integration/wbimodeler/.

  34. IBM: MQ Workflow, http://www.ibm.com/software/ts/mqseries/workflow/, 2003.

  35. IDS-Scheer: Aris Toolset, http://www.ids-scheer.de/, 2003.

  36. Intelligence in Motion, http://www.intelligence.gov/2what.shtml, 2003.

  37. I. Jacobson, M. Ericsson, and A. Jacobson, The Object Advantage, Addison-Wesley, 1995.

  38. KAAZA, http://www.kaaza.com/, 2003.

  39. G. Keller, M. Nuttgens, and A.W. Scheer, “Semantische prozessmodellierung auf der grundlage ereignisgesteuerter prozessketten (EPK),” Veroeffentlichungen des Instituts fur Wirtschanftisinformatic, A.W. Scheer (Ed.), No. 89, Saarbruecken, 1992.

  40. P. Korzeniowski, “Workflow software automates processes,” Software Magazine, Feb. 1993.

  41. Lotus: Lotus Notes, http://www.lotus.com/home.nsf/welcome/notes, 2003.

  42. Lotus: Sametime, http://www.lotus.com/home.nsf/welcome/sametime, 2001.

  43. Lotus: Team Workplace (QuickPlace), http://www.lotus.com/home.nsf/welcome/quickplace, 2003.

  44. D. Marca and C.L. McGowan: SADT. McGraw-Hill, 1988.

  45. D. Marca and C.L. McGowan, IDEF0/SADT Business Process and Enterprice Modeling, Eclectic Solutions, ISBN 0-963875-0-0-0, 1991.

  46. R. Marshak: Software to Support BPR-The value of Capturing Process Definitions,Workgroup Computing Report, Patricia Seybold Group, vol. 17, no. 7, 1994.

  47. S. McCready: There is more than one kind of Workflow Software, Computerworld, Nov. 1992.

  48. R. Medina-Mora, T. Winograd, R. Flores, and F. Flores, “The action workflow approach to workflow management technology,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'92). ACM Press: Toronto, Ontario, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  49. MetaSoftware, http://www.metasoftware.com/, 2003.

  50. Microsoft: Live Meeting (Placeware Auditorium), 2003, http://www.placeware.com/.

  51. Microsoft: Microsoft Exchange, http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/, 2003.

  52. Microsoft: NetMeeting, http://www.microsoft.com/windows/NetMeeting/, 2003.

  53. Netopia: Tibuctu, http://www.netopia.com/ebusiness/, 2003.

  54. Novell: GroupWise, http://www.novell.com/groupwise/index.html, 2003.

  55. OASIS, http://www.oasis-open.org/, 2003.

  56. Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/, 2003.

  57. Opentext: Livelink Intranet, http://www.opentext.com/livelink/, 2003.

  58. E.R. Pedersen and T. Sokoler, “AROMA: Abstract representation of presence supporting mutual awareness,” in Conf. Proc. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'97), 1997.

  59. V.O. Pince and R.M. Shapiro, “An integrated software development methodology based on hierarchical colored petri nets,” in Advances in Petri Nets, G. Rozenberg (Ed.), Springer-Verlag, 1990.

  60. Plexus: FloWare, http://www.plx.com/, 2003.

  61. Polycom: ViewStation, http://www.polycom.com/, 2003.

  62. M. Reichert and P. Dadam, “ADEPTflex–Supporting dynamic changes ofworkflows without loosing control,” Journal of Intelligent Information Systems (JIIS), Special Issue on Workflow Management Systems, vol. 10, no. 2, 1998.

  63. SAP: http://www.sap.com/, 2003.

  64. T. Schael and B. Zeller, “Design principles for cooperative office support systems in distributed process management,” Support Functionality in the Office Environment, A. Verrijn-Stuart (Ed), North Holland, 1991.

  65. A.W. Scheer, Architecture of Integrated Information Systems, Springer-Verlag, 1992.

  66. R. Siebert, “An open architecture for adaptive workflow management systems,” Transactions of the SDPS: Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, Austin, Texas, 1999.

  67. M. Sohlenkamp and G. Chwelos, “Integrating communication, cooperation, and awareness the DIVA virtual office environment,” in Proc. of the Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'94), 1994.

  68. Staffware, http://www.staffware.com, May 2002.

  69. TeamWare, http://www.teamw.com/, Dec. 1997.

  70. Telcordia: ATLAS, http://www.argreenhouse.com/ATLAS/, 2003.

  71. TIBCO: InConcert, http://www.tibco.com/products/in concert/index.html, 2003.

  72. Vignette, Content Management Server, http://www.vignette.com/, 2003.

  73. Vitria: http://www.vitria.com, 2003.

  74. M. Weske, “Flexible modeling and execution of workflow activities,” in Proc. 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Software Technology Track 1998, vol. VII.

  75. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3c.org/, 2003.

  76. Workflow Management Coalition, http://www.wfmc.org, 2003.

  77. Workflow Management Coalition, Interface 1: Process Definition Interchange Process Model. Document Number WfMC TC-1016-P, Version 7.04, Nov. 1998.

  78. Workflow Management Facility. Revised Submission, OMG Document Number bom/98-06-07, Object Management Group, July, 1998.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Georgakopoulos, D. Teamware: An Evaluation of Key Technologies and Open Problems. Distributed and Parallel Databases 15, 9–44 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DAPD.0000009430.25263.34

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DAPD.0000009430.25263.34

Keywords

  • Information System
  • Operating System
  • Data Structure
  • Open Problem
  • Additional Research