Skip to main content
Log in

The Timing of Uncertainty and the Intensity of Policy

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the trade-off between `caution' and `intensity' in the use of the control variable in a one-state one-control dynamic stochastic quadratic linear optimization problem with discount factor. It studies the effects that changes in uncertainty of the control parameter have on the optimal first period response of the control variable, showing that the trade-off between `caution' and `intensity' depends on the timing of the uncertainty. Given an increase in current uncertainty and an equal increase in future uncertainty, caution will always prevail over intensity. Moreover, the prevalence of caution will be enlarged as the increase in future uncertainty moves farther away into the future, while this prevalence will be reduced as the increase in future uncertainty expands into the future. Finally, for the infinite horizon case, caution is the optimal policy response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amman, Hans M. and Kendrick, David A. (1999). The DUALI/DUALPC Software for Optimal Control Models: User's Guide. Center for Applied Research in Economics, The University of Texas, TP 9203, revised December 1999 (www.eco.utexas.edu/faculty/Kendrick/).

  • Amman, Hans M. and Kendrick, David A. (1999). Should macroeconomic policy makers consider parameter covariances? Computational Economics, 14 (3), 263–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amman, Hans M., Kendrick, David A. and Neudecker, Heinz (1995). Numercial steady state solutions for nonlinear dynamic optimization models, unpublished.

  • Athans, M., Ku, R. and Gershwin S. (1977). The uncertainty threshold principle: Some fundamental limitations of optimal decision making under dynamic uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-22 (5), October.

  • Bertsekas, Dimitri (1995). Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Athena Scientific. Belmont, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, William (1967). Uncertainty and the effectiveness of policy. American Economic Review, 57 (2), 411–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulakis, Nicos, Kemball-Cook, David and Levine, Paul (1993). The design of economic policy under model uncertainty. Computational Economics, 6 (3-4), 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarida, Richard, Gali, Jordi and Gertler, Mark (1999). The science of monetary policy: A new keynesian perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, XXXVII, 1661–1707, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craine, Roger (1979). Optimal monetary policy with uncertainty. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1, 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, Gregory (1973). Effect of uncertainty on optimal control policies. International Economic Review, 14 (3), 632–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, Atish and Masson, Paul (1994). Economic Cooperation in an Uncertain World. Blackwell.

  • Holly, Sean and Hugues-Hallett, Andrew (1989). Optimal Control, Expectations and Uncertainty. Cambridge University Press.

  • Kendrick, David A. (1981). Stochastic Control for Economic Models. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercado, P. Ruben and Kendrick, David A. (2000). Caution in macroeconomics: Uncertainty and the relative intensity of policy. Economics Letters, 68 (1), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercado, P. Ruben and Kendrick, David A. (1999). Computational methods for macro policy analysis: Hall and Taylor's model in DUALI. In A. Hugues-Hallett and P. McAdam (eds.), Analyses in Macroeconomic Modelling, Chapter 8, 179–206. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston and Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shupp, Franklin (1976). Uncertainty and optimal stabilization policy. Journal of Public Economics, 6, 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, Brian (2000). Does the fed act gradually? A VAR analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 46 (1), 229–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnovsky, Stephen (1975). Optimal choice of monetary instrument in a linear economic model with stochastic coefficients. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 7, 5180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, Volker (1998). Monetary policy under uncertainty about the natural unemployment rate, finance and economics discussion series 98-22. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mercado, P.R. The Timing of Uncertainty and the Intensity of Policy. Computational Economics 23, 303–313 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CSEM.0000026788.19107.15

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CSEM.0000026788.19107.15

Navigation