Skip to main content
Log in

Contractarianism as Liberal Conservatism: Buchanan's Unfinished Philosophical Agenda

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper distinguishes several types of contractarianism. It argues that Buchanan type contractarianism may be classified as a specific “formal type” of conservatism that grants normative status to the status quo. How such conservative contractarianism relates to and possibly blends into classical liberalism is sketched and it is suggested that classical liberal ideals along with a specific form of conservatism rather than the idea of a contract per se should be seen as the core of Buchanan type contractarianism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlert, M., and Kliemt, H. (eds.) (2001) Making Choices in Organ Allocation. (Special Volume: Analyse & Kritik) 23 Stuttgart: Lucius and Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninghaus, S., Ehrhart, K. M., and Keser, C. (2002) ''Conventions and Local Interaction Structures: Experimental Evidence.'' Games and Economic Behavior 29: 177–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H. G., and Lomasky, L. E. (1983) ''Institutional Aspects of 'Merit Goods' Analysis.'' Finanzarchiv, N.F., 41/2: 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H. G., and Lomasky, L. E. (1985) ''The impartial spectator goes to Washington.'' Economics and Philosophy 1: 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, H. G., and Lomasky, L. E. (1993) Democracy and Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975) The Limits of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Tullock, G. (1962) The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (1979) ''Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.'' The Journal of Philosophy LXXVI: 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, S. (2000) Überlegungsgleichgewicht(e).Prüfung einer Rechtfertigungsmetapher. Freibrug i.Br.: Karl Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, A. (2001) ''Contractarianism.'' In: Smelser, N. J., and Baltes, P. B. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1975) ''The Survival Lottery.'' Philosophy 50: 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasay, A. de (1991) Choice, Contract, Consent: A Restatement of Liberalism. London: Institute of Economic Affairs (Hobart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasay, A. de, (1996) ''Justice as Something Else.'' The Cato Journal 16: 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliemt, H. (1994a) Virginia Virtue-Virginia Vice. Tenth Annual Lecture in the Virginia Political Economy Lecture Series: Fairfax, Va., Center for Study of Public Choice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliemt, H. (1994b) ''The calculus of consent after thirty years.'' Public Choice 79: 341–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliemt, H. (1986) ''The Veil of Insignificance.'' European Journal of Political Economy 2/3: 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. (1974) The Cement of the Universe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974), Anarchy, State, and Utopia.: New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1951) ''Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics.'' Philosophical Review 60: 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. (1932/1984) An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, H. (1992) Autonomy and Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A., and Zahavi, A. (1997) The Handicap Principle. A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kliemt, H. Contractarianism as Liberal Conservatism: Buchanan's Unfinished Philosophical Agenda. Constitutional Political Economy 15, 171–185 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COPE.0000029642.35879.88

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COPE.0000029642.35879.88

Keywords

Navigation