Skip to main content
Log in

The Status Quo in Contractarian-Constitutionalist Perspective

  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

That it favors the status quo is one of the most common and persistent objections raised against the contractarian-constitutionalist approach and, specifically, against its emphasis on voluntary agreement as the fundamental legitimizing principle for social reform. This paper seeks to clarify certain ambiguities that have surrounded the arguments of critics as well as contractarian responses to them. Its main emphasis will be on separating two issues the differences between which have not always been sufficiently recognized in the debate, namely, on the one hand, the role of the status quo as the inevitable starting point of any change and, on the other hand, the issue of the normative evaluation of the status quo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, B. (1992) “The Mirage of Corrective Justice.” In: Idem, The Future of Liberal Revolution, pp. 69–98. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1965) Political Argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., and Buchanan, J. M. (1985) The Reason of Rules-Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1975) The Limits of Liberty-Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1977a) “Before Public Choice.” In: Idem, Freedom in Constitutional Contract-Perspectives of a Political Economist, pp. 81–93. College Station and London: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1977b) “The Use and Abuse of Contract.” In: Idem, Freedom in Constitutional Contract-Perspectives of a Political Economist, pp. 135–147. College Station and London: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1986) “Political Economy and Social Philosophy.” In: Idem, Liberty, Market and State-Political Economy in the 1980s, pp. 261–274. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1993) “How Can Constitutions Be Designed so that Politicians Who Seek to Serve 'Public Interest' Can Survive and Prosper?” Constitutional Political Economy 4: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1999) “The Foundations of Normative Individualism.” In: The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty. The Collected Works of James Buchanan, M. (ed.) Vol. 1, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Tullock, G. (1961) The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Samuels, W. J. (1975) “On Some Fundamental Issues in Political Economy.” Journal of Economic Issues 9: 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., and Congleton, R. D. (1998) Politics by Principle, not Interest-Toward Nondiscriminatory Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. L. (1990) “Constitutional Contractarianism,” Constitutional Political Economy 1: 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1972) “Forward” to The Road to Serfdom, pp. iii–xvi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (2003) Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1966) The Open Society and its Enemies, Vol. 1, The Spell of Plato. London: Routledge (5th ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. W. (1975) “The Limits of Consensual Decision.” American Political Science Review 69: 1270–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, D. (1990) The Political Economy of James Buchanan. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, W. J. (1976) “The Myth of Liberty and the Realities of the Corporate State: A Review Article.” Journal of Economic Issues 10: 923–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. J. (2002) “Constitutional Economics and Ethics-On the Relation Between Self-Interest and Morality.” In: Brennan, G., Kliemt, H., and Tollison, R.D (eds.) Methods and Morals in Constitutional Economic-Essays in Honor of James M. Buchanan, pp. 485–503. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. J. and Buchanan J. M. (1991) “Constitutional Choice, Rational Ignorance and the Limits of Reason.” Jahrbuch für Neue Politische Ökonomie 10, pp. 61–78. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. (Reprinted in The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan, Vol. 16, pp. 127-147. Indianapolis 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K. (1896) “Über ein neues Prinzip der gerechten Besteuerung.” In: Idem (eds.) Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen nebst Darstellung und Kritik des Steuersystems Schwedens, pp. 76–164. Jena: Gustav Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K. (1967) “A New Principle of Just Taxation.” In: Musgrave, R.A., and Peacock, A. T. Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, pp. 72–118. New York: St Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanberg, V.J. The Status Quo in Contractarian-Constitutionalist Perspective. Constitutional Political Economy 15, 153–170 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COPE.0000029641.48448.19

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COPE.0000029641.48448.19

Keywords

Navigation