Abstract
We developed a survey to look at psychiatrists' attitudes toward psychotropic prescribing guidelines, specifically the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) algorithms. The 22-page survey was distributed to 24 psychiatrists working in 4 CMHC's; 13 completed the survey. 90% agreed that guidelines should be general and flexible. The majority also agreed that guidelines should define how to measure response to a specific agent; fewer agreed guidelines should specify dosage, side effect management, or augmentation strategies. Psychiatrists were familiar with TMAP; none referred to it in their practice. In spite of this, psychiatrists' medication preferences were similar to those suggested by guidelines.
REFERENCES
Chiles JA, Miller AL, Crismon ML, Rush AJ, Krasnoff AS, and Shon SS: The Texas Medication Algorithm Project: development and implementation of the schizophrenia algorithm. Psychiatric Services. 50:69-74, 1999.
Chilvers R, Harrison G, Sipos A, Barley M: Evidence into practice. British Journal of Psychiatry. 181:99-101, 2002.
Mellman TA, Miller AL, Weissman EM, Crismon ML, Essock SM, and Marder SR: Evidence-based pharmacologic treatment for people with severe mental illness: a focus on guidelines and algorithms. Psychiatric Services. 52:619-625, 2001.
Milner KK and Valenstein M: A comparison of guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services. 53:888-890, 2002.
Torrey WC, Drake RE, Dixon L, Burns BJ, Flynn L, Rush AJ, Clark RE, and Klatzker D: Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services. 52:45-50, 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Healy, D.J., Goldman, M., Florence, T. et al. A Survey of Psychiatrists' Attitudes Toward Treatment Guidelines. Community Ment Health J 40, 177–184 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COMH.0000022736.61003.2e
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COMH.0000022736.61003.2e