Conservation Genetics

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 259–269 | Cite as

Dynamic management of genetic resources: maintenance of outcrossing in experimental metapopulations of a predominantly inbreeding species

  • Emmanuelle Porcher
  • Pierre-Henri Gouyon
  • Claire Lavigne
Article

Abstract

Dynamic management of genetic resources inpredominantly inbreeding species requiresincreased levels of outcrossing to limit theloss of genetic variation due to smallereffective sizes and to favour the emergence ofnew genetic combinations. Here, we show thatoutcrossing rates can artificially bepermanently increased in experimental evolvingplant metapopulations, using Arabidopsisthaliana as a model. We introducedmale-sterility genes and used an adequatemanagement of the resulting female plants tomodify the outcrossing rates. As expected, theincrease in outcrossing resulted in lowerlevels of heterozygote deficiency (Fis) than observed in natural populationsof A. thaliana and therefore in themaintenance of potentially higher levels ofgenetic variation. An additional selectiveadvantage for females' offspring, due to theproduction of larger seeds by females and apossible heterosis effect, furthermore led tosmaller Fis than expected from therealized outcrossing rate. This selectiveadvantage also resulted in an increase infemale frequency, especially in metapopulationswith large population sizes, creating anon-causal negative correlation between femalefrequency and heterozygote deficiency.

Arabidopsis thaliana heterozygote deficiency heterosis male-sterility seed size 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott RJ, Gomes MF (1989) Population genetic structure and outcrossing rate of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Heredity, 62, 411–418.Google Scholar
  2. Allard RW (1992) Reproductive systems and dynamic management of genetic resources. In: Reproductive Biology and Plant Breeding (eds. Dattée Y, Dumas C, Gallais A), pp. 325–333. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. Andalo C, Goldringer I, Godelle B (2001) Inter-and intragenotypic competition under elevated carbon dioxide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology, 82, 157–164.Google Scholar
  4. Bürger R (1999) Evolution of genetic variability and the advantage of sex and recombination in changing environments. Genetics, 153, 1055–1069.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1978) A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat., 112, 975–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1995) Quantitative genetics in plants: The effect of the breeding system on genetic variability. Evolution, 49, 911–920.Google Scholar
  7. Darwin C (1877) Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  8. Dattée Y, Dumas C, Gallais A (eds.) (1992) Reproductive Biology and Plant Breeding. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. Enjalbert J, Goldringer I, David J, Brabant P (1998) The relevance of outcrossing for the dynamic management of genetic resources in predominantly selfing Triticum aestivum L. (bread wheat). Genet. Sel. Evol., 30 (Suppl. 1), S197–S211.Google Scholar
  10. Frankham RF (1999) Quantitative genetics in conservation biology. Genet. Res., 74, 237–244.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldringer I, Enjalbert J, David JL, Paillard S, Pham JL, Brabant P (2001) Dynamic management of genetic resources: A 13 years experiment on wheat. In: Broadening the Genetic Bases of Crop Production (eds. Cooper HD, Spillane C, Hodgkin T), pp. 245–259. CAB International.Google Scholar
  12. Goudet J (1995) Fstat version 1.2: A computer program to calculate Fstatistics. J. Hered., 86, 485–486.Google Scholar
  13. Gouyon PH (1983) How to be a self-fertile hermaphrodite. Genet. Sel. Evol., 15, 83–90.Google Scholar
  14. Gouyon PH, Couvet D (1987) A conflict between two sexes, females and hermaphrodites. Experientia Suppl., 55, 245–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamrick JL, Godt MJ (1996) Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 351, 1291–1298.Google Scholar
  16. Haring V, Gray JE, McClure BA, Anderson MA, Clarke AE (1990) Self-incompatibility: A self recognition system in plants. Science, 250, 937–941.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Henry JP, Pontis C, David J, Gouyon PH (1991) An experiment on dynamic conservation of genetic resources with metapopulations. In: Species Conservation: A Population-biological Approach (eds. Seitz A, Loeschke V), pp. 185–198. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar
  18. Horner HT, Palmer RG (1995) Mechanisms of genic male sterility. Crop Sci., 35, 1527–1535.Google Scholar
  19. Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution, 50, 54–70.Google Scholar
  20. Kahler AL, Clegg MT, Allard W (1975) Evolutionary changes in the mating system of an experimental population of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 72, 943–946.Google Scholar
  21. Lavigne C, Reboud X, Lefranc M, Porcher E, Roux F, Olivieri I, Godelle B (2001) Evolution of genetic diversity in metapopulations. Arabidopsis thaliana as an experimental model. Gen. Sel. Evol., 33, S399–S423.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis D (1941) Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphroditic plants. New Phytol., 40, 56–63.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis D (1942) The evolution of sex in flowering plants. Biol. Rev., 17, 46–67.Google Scholar
  24. Liu F, Charlesworth D, Kreitman M (1999) The effect of mating system differences on nucleotide diversity at the phosphoglucose isomerase locus in the plant genus Leavenworthia. Genetics, 151, 343–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu F, Zhang L, Charlesworth D (1998) Genetic diversity in Leavenworthia populations with different inbreeding levels. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 265, 293–301.Google Scholar
  26. Long J, Cromwell E, Gold K (2000) On-farm Management of Crop Diversity: An Introductory Bibliography. Overseas Development Institute, Intermediate Technology Development Group.Google Scholar
  27. Pollak E (1987) On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing. Genetics, 117, 353–360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. SAS Institute (2000) SAS/STAT User Guide, Version 8. SAS Publishing, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  29. Schoen DJ, Brown HD (1991) Intraspecific variation in population gene diversity and effective population size correlates with the mating system in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88, 4494–4497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schultz ST, Lynch M (1997) Mutation and extinction: The role of variable mutational effects, synergistic epistasis, beneficial mutations, and degree of outcrossing. Evolution, 51, 1363–1371.Google Scholar
  31. Snape JW, Lawrence MJ (1971) The breeding system of Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity, 27, 299–302.Google Scholar
  32. Wang J, Caballero A (1999) Developments in predicting the effective size of subdivided populations. Heredity, 82, 212–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wright S (1969) The theory of gene frequency. In: Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, pp. 194–196. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuelle Porcher
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pierre-Henri Gouyon
    • 1
  • Claire Lavigne
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire Ecologie, Systématique et EvolutionUniversité Paris-XI /Orsay CedexFrance
  2. 2.Division of BiologyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations