Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inbreeding and reintroduction: Progeny success in rare Silene populations of varied density

  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic factors influence the populationviability of rare species, yet the fitnessconsequences of inbred and outbred progeny areseldom tested empirically in reintroductionstrategies designed for species recovery orhabitat restoration. Rare and endangeredplants of Silene (Caryophyllaceae) occuron four continents, including North America. In Oregon, inbred and outbred progeny weremonitored for three years after experimentalreintroduction of a narrow endemic, S.douglasii var. oraria, into formerlygrazed habitat within its presumed historicalrange. Survival and reproduction were comparedfor progeny that were derived from the seeds ofself- versus cross-pollinated flowersproduced in situ at Cascade Head, aUNESCO Biosphere Reserve where the largest ofthree extant populations occurs. Progeny ofcross-pollinated flowers had significantlygreater field survival in all years than didoffspring of selfed or open-pollinated flowers(P < 0.01). Outbred progeny alsosignificantly exceeded other treatment cohortsin canopy area, and produced more reproductivestems and flowers than other progeny types ofthe same maternity. For plots varying in plantdensity, mortality was greatest in thehigh-density competitive regime but thesurvivors reached significantly larger sizesand reproductive capacities than in low densityplots (P < 0.05). In all, successfulconservation plans involving reintroduction mayrequire genetically diverse progeny to offsetinbreeding depression as well as suitableplanting densities and source populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson R, Baskin J (1999) Savannas, Barrens, and Rock Outcrop Plant Communities of North America.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics J, Thrall P, Jarosz A, Stratton D (1994) Ecological genetics of metapopulations: Silene-Ustilagoplant-pathogen system. In: Ecological Genetics (ed. Real L), pp. 146–170. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett S, Kohn J (1991) Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Conservation of Rare Plants (eds. Falk D, Holsinger K), pp. 3–30. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour M, Major J (1995) Terrestrial Vegetation of California.Special publication 9. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown E, Kephart S (1999) Variability in pollen load: Implications for reproduction and seedling vigor in a rare plant, Silene douglasiivar. oraria. Int. J. of Plant Sci., 160, 1145–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, M, McBride J, Betz R (1998) Management and restoration ecology of the federal threatened Mead's milkweed, Asclepias meadii(Asclepiadaceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard., 85, 110–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers D, Waller D (1999) Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys., 30, 479–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Morgan M (1990) Genetic loads and estimates of mutation rates in highly inbred populations. Nature, 347, 380–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan R (1994) Patterns of isozyme variation in relation to population size, isolation, and phytogeographic history in royal catchfly (Silene regia). Amer. J. Bot., 81, 965–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudash M (1990) Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularisL. (Gentianaceae): A comparison in three environments. Evolution, 44, 1129–1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudash M, Fenster C (2001) The role of breeding system and inbreeding depression in the maintenance of an outcrossing mating strategy in Silene virginica(Caryophyllaceae). Amer. J. Bot., 88, 1953–1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert D, Haag C, Kirkpatrick M, Riek M, Hottinger J, Pajunen V (2002) A selective advantage to immigrant genes in a Daphniametapopulation. Science, 295, 485–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellstrand N, Elam D (1993) Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys., 24, 217–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register (1993, 1996) Plant Taxa for Listing as Endangered or Threatened Species. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster C, Dudash M (1994) Genetic considerations for plant population restoration and conservation. In: Restoration of Endangered Species (eds. Bowles M, Whelan C), pp. 34–62. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster C, Galloway L (2000) Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata(Fabaceae). Conserv. Biol., 14, 1406–1412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler P, Knapp B, Fredricks N (1998) Rare plant demography: Lessons from the mariposa lilies (Calochortus: Liliaceae). In: Conservation Biology (eds. Fiedler P, Kareva P), pp. 28–48. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankham R, Gilligan D, Morris D, Briscoe D (2001) Inbreeding and extinction: Effects of purging. Conserv. Genet., 2, 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friar E, Boose D, LaDoux T, Roalson E, Robichaux H (2001) Population structure in the endangered Mauna Loa silversword, Argyroxiphium kauense(Asteraceae), and its bearing on reintroduction. Mol. Ecol. 10, 1657–1663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles B, Goudet J (1997) Genetic differentiation in Silene dioicametapopulations: Estimation of spatio-temporal effects in a successional plant species. Am. Nat., 149, 507–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant E (1996) Designing populations: Demographic, genetic, and horticultural dimensions. In: Restoring Diversity (eds. Falk D, Millar C, Olwell M), pp. 171–208. Island Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haikola S (2001) Inbreeding depression and the maintenance of genetic load in Melitaea cinxiametapopulations. Conserv. Genet., 2, 325–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gilpin M (1997) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 42, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick P, Kalinowski S (2000) Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys., 31, 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helenurm K, Parsons L (1997) Genetic variation and the reintroduction of Cordylanthus maritimusssp maritimusto Sweetwater Marsh, California. Restor. Ecol., 5, 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helenurm K (1998) Outplanting and differential source population success in Lupinus guadallupensis. Conserv. Biol., 12, 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herschel S, Paige K (1995) Inbreeding depression, environmental stress, and population size variation in Scarlet gilia (Imposis aggregata). Conserv. Biol., 9, 126–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger K (2000) Demography and extinction in small populations. In: Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations (eds. Young A, Clarke G), pp. 55–74. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Invarsson P, Giles B (1999) Kin-structured colonization and smallscale genetic differentiation in Silene dioica. Evolution, 53, 605–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez J, Hughes K, Alaks G, Graham L, Lacy R (1994) An experimental study of inbreeding depression in a natural habitat. Science, 266, 271–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart S, Paladino C (1997) Demographic change and microhabitat variability in a grassland endemic, Silene douglasiivar. oraria(Caryophyllaceae). Amer. J. Bot., 84, 179–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart S, Sturgeon K, Lum J, Bledsoe K (1999a) Varietal relationships in Silene douglasii(Caryophyllaceae): morphological variability at the population level. Sys. Bot., 24, 529–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kephart S, Brown E, Hall J (1999b) Inbreeding depression and partial selfing: Evolutionary implications of mixed-mating in a coastal endemic, Silene douglasiivar. oraria(Caryophyllaceae). Heredity, 82, 543–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp E, Dyer A (1998) When do genetic considerations require special approaches to ecological restoration? In: Conservation Biology (eds. Fiedler P, Kareva P), pp. 345–363. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesica P (1997) Demography of the endangered plant. Silene spaldingii(Caryophyllaceae) in northwest Montana. Madroño, 40, 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesica P, Allendorf F (1992) Are small populations of plants worth preserving? Conserv. Biol., 6, 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1969) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 15, 137–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luijten S, Marckéry J, Oostermeijer J, den Nijs J (2002) Demographic consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding in Arnica montana: A field experiment. J. Ecol., 90, 592–603.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins P, Jain S (1979) Role of genetic variation in the colonizing ability of rose clover (Trifolium hirtumAll.) Am. Nat., 114, 591–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunder M (1992) Plant reintroduction: An overview. Biodivers. Conserv., 1, 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley D, Raveill J, Antonovics J (1995) Local founding events as determinants of genetic structure in a plant metapopulation. Heredity, 75, 630–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley D, Richards D, Emery S, Smith R, McGlothlin (2001) The interaction of genetic and demographic processes in plant metapopulation. In: Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial Context (eds. Silvertown J, Antonovics J), pp. 177–196. Blackwell Science Inc., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlaughlin M, Karoly K, Kaye T (2002) Genetic variation and its relationship to population size in reintroduced populations of the pink sand verbena, Abronia umbellatasubsp. breviflora(Nyctaginaceae). Conserv. Genet., 3, 411–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney M (1997) Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: Combining ecological and paleontological views. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys., 28, 495–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges E (1992) Stochastic modeling of extinction in plant populations. In: Conservation Biology. The Theory and Practice of Nature Conservation, Preservation and Management (eds. Fiedler P, Jain S), pp. 254–275. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menges E, Dolan R (1998) Demographic viability of populations of Silene regiain midwestern prairies: Relationships with fire management, genetic variation, geographic location, population size and isolation. J. Ecol., 86, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo A, Williams S, Rice K, Buchmann S, Cory C, Handel S, Nabhan G, Primack R, Robichaux R (1997) Restoration biology: A population biology perspective. Restor. Ecol., 5, 277–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan J (2000) Reproductive success in reestablished versus natural populations of a threatened grassland daisy (Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides). Conserv. Biol., 14, 780–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman D, Pilson, D (1997) Increased probability of extinction due to decreased genetic effective population size: Experimental populations of Clarkia pulchella. Evolution, 51, 354–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostermeijer JG, van Eijck M, den Nijs H (1994) Offspring fitness in relation to population size and genetic variation in the rare perennial plant species Gentiana pneumonanthe(Gentianaceae). Oecologia 97, 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oostermeijer JG (2000) Demography species Gentiana pneumonanthe: the importance of genetics, demography, and reproductive biology. In: Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations (eds. Young A, Clarke G), pp. 55–74. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B, Manning E (1993) Assessing limitations on the growth of endangered plant populations, I. Experimental demography of Erysimum capitatumssp. angustatumand Oenothera deltoidesssp. Howellii. Biol. Conserv., 65, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik B, Nickrent D, Howald A (1993) The recovery of an endangered plant, I. Creating a new population of Amsinckia grandiflora. Conserv. Biol., 7, 510–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polans N, Allard R (1989) An experimental evaluation of the recovery potential of rye grass populations from genetic stress resulting from restriction of population size. Evolution, 43, 1320–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin A, Weller S, Sakai A (2002) Mating system instability in Schiedia menziesii(Caryophyllaceae). Evolution, 56, 1574–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards C (2000a) Genetic and demographic influences on population persistence: Gene flow and genetic rescue in Silene alba.In: Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations (eds. Young A, Clarke G), pp. 271–291. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards C (2000b) Inbreeding depression and genetic rescue in a plant metapopulation. Am Nat., 155, 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley J (1983) Description of the Plant Communities and Sucession of the Oregon Coast Grasslands. Ph.D Thesiis, Oreg State University, Corvallis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri M, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1997) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature, 392, 491–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske D, Husband B, Ruckelshaus M, Goodwillie C, Parker I, Bishop G (1994) Evaluating apporaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology, 75, 584–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen D, Brown A (2001) The conservation of wild plant species in seed banks. BioScience, 51, 960–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz M (1999) Choosing the appropriate scale of reserves for conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys., 30, 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan M, Karowe D (2000) Inbreeding, outbeeding, and heterosis in the yellow pitcher plant, Sarracenia flava (Sarraceniacea), in Virginia. Amer. J. Bot., 87, 1628–1633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin W, Moritz C (2000) Managing and monitoring genetic erosion. In: Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations (eds. Young A, Clarke G), pp. 9–34. Cambridge University Press.

  • Smulders M, van der Schoot J, Geerts R, Antoinisse-de Jong A, Korevaar H, van der Werf A, Vosman B (2000) Genetic diversity and the reintroduction of meadow species. Plant Biol., 2, 447–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule M, Mills S (1998) No need to isolate genetics. Science, 282, 1658–1659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stromberg M, Kephart P, Yadon V (2001) Composition, invasibility, and diversity in coastal California grasslands. Madroño, 48, 236–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stüwe M, Scribner K (1989) Low genetic variability in reintroduced alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex) populations. J. Mammol., 70, 370–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Meej R, Lehman C, Nowak M (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature, 371, 65–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter K, Gillett H (1998) IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants. Cambridge, UK.

  • Waser N, Price M (1994) Crossing-distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii(Ranunculaceae): Outbreeding and inbreeding depression in progeny fitness. Evolution, 48, 842–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerbergh A, Saura A (1994) Gene flow and pollinator behaviour in Silene dioicapopulations. Oikos, 71, 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams S, Davis C (1996) Population genetic analyses of transplanted eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds reveal reduced genetic diversity in southern California. Restor. Ecol., 4, 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson P, Werth C (1999) Levels and patterns of genetic variation in the endangered species Abronia macrocarpa(Nyctaginaceae). Amer. J. Bot., 86, 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis J (1999) Inbreeding load, average dominance and the mutation rate for midly deleterious alleles in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution, 53, 1678–1691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe A, Xiang Q, Kephart S (1998) Assessing hybridization in natural populations of Penstemon(Scrophulariaceae) using hypervariable inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) bands. Mol. Ecol., 7, 1107–1125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trn. Ecol. Evol., 11, 413–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Murray A (2000) Genetic bottlenecks and dysgenic flow into re-established populations of the grassland daisy, Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides. Austr. J. Bot., 48, 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, J (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Willamette University, 900 State St., Salem, OR, 97301, USA

    Susan R. Kephart

Authors
  1. Susan R. Kephart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kephart, S.R. Inbreeding and reintroduction: Progeny success in rare Silene populations of varied density. Conservation Genetics 5, 49–61 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COGE.0000014056.65197.c4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COGE.0000014056.65197.c4

Search

Navigation