References
Baker AJ (2000) Molecular Methods in Ecology. Blackwell Science, London.
Blin N, Stafford DW (1976) A general method for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from eukaryotes. Nucl. Acids Res., 3, 2303–2308.
Chenuil A, Galtier N, Berrebi P (1999) A test of the hypothesis of an autopolyploid vs allopolyploid origin for a tetraploid lineage: Application to the genus Barbus(Cyprinidae). Heredity, 82, 373–380.
Cifarelli RA, Gallitelli M, Cellini F (1995) Random amplified hybridization microsatellites (RAHM): Isolation of a new class of microsatellite-containing DNA clones. Nucl. Acids Res., 23, 3802–1803.
D'Amato ME, Lunt DH, Carvalho GR (1999) Microsatellite markers for the hake Macruronus magellanicusamplify other gadoid fish. Mol. Ecol., 8, 1086–1088.
Lunt DH, Hutchinson WF, Carvalho GR (1999) An efficient method for PCR-based isolation of microsatellite arrays (PIMA). Mol. Ecol., 8, 891–892.
Raymond M, Rousset M (1995) GENEPOP (Version 1.2), a population genetic software for exact tests and ecumenism. J. Hered., 86, 248–249.
Scribner KT, Pearce JM (2000) Microsatellites: Evolutionary and methodological background and empirical applications at individual, population and phylogenetic levels. In: Molecular Methods in Ecology (ed. Backer AJ), pp. 235–273. Blackwell Science, London.
Tseng MC, Chiang TY, Wang JP (1998) Population structure of Acrossocheilus paradoxusGunther (Cyprinidae). Endem. Sp. Res., 1, 20–27.
Wang JP, Hsu KC, Chiang TY (2000) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of Acrossocheilus paradoxus(Cyprinidae) in Taiwan. Mol. Ecol., 9, 1483–1494.
Wu WL, Wang JP, Tseng MJ, Chiang TY (1999) Cloning and genetic variability of a Hind III repetitive DNA in Acrossocheilus paradoxus(Cyprinidae). Genome, 42, 780–788.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hsu, KC., Wang, JP., Chen, XL. et al. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Acrossocheilus paradoxus (Cyprinidae) using PCR-based isolation of microsatellite arrays (PIMA). Conservation Genetics 5, 113–115 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COGE.0000014051.67562.55
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COGE.0000014051.67562.55