Abstract
Within the large literature on inter-organizational networks, there has been some discussion of linking-pin organizations and the role they play in integrating these networks. Based on this verbal specification of linking-pin organizations, we construct operational criteria and empirical methods for identifying these structurally important organizations in potentially large and complex inter-organizational networks. These methods are based on ideas drawn from blockmodeling, structural holes, centrality and centralization of networks, and identifying cut-points in networks. These methods are applied to a constructed example and then to real empirical inter-organizational networks. Implications and contrasts with other methods are discussed, together with some open problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldrich, H.E. (1979), Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Astley, W.G.R. and C.J. Fombrun (1987), “Organizational Communities: An Ecological Perspective,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations,5,163–185.
Aldrich, H.E. and D.A. Whetten (1981), “Organization Sets, Action Sets and Networks: Making the Most of Simplicity,” in P. Nystrom and W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, pp. 385–408.
Baker, W.E. and R.R. Faulkner (2002), “Interorganizational Networks,” in J.A.C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 520–540
Batagelj, V. (1997), “Notes on Blockmodeling,” Social Networks, 19, 143–155.
Batagelj, V. and A. Mrvar (2003), Pajek: A Program for Large Network Analysis. Lubljana: University of Ljubljana.
Batagelj, V., P. Doreian and A. Ferligoj (1992b), “An Optimizational Approach to Regular Equivalence,” Social Networks, 14, 121–135.
Batagelj, V., A. Ferligoj and P. Doreian (1992a), “Direct and Indirect Methods for Structural Equivalence,” Social Networks, 14, 63–90.
Borgatti S.P. and M.E. Everett (1989), “The Class of Regular Equivalences: Algebraic Structure and Computation,” Social Networks, 11, 65–88.
Borgatti S.P., M.E. Everett and L.C. Freeman (2002), Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Breiger, R.L., S.A. Boorman and P. Arabie (1975), “An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison to multidimensional scaling,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 328–383.
Burt, R.S. (1976), “Positions in networks,” Social Forces, 55, 93–122.
Burt, R.S. (1992), Structural Holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
DiMaggio, P.M. (1986), “Structural Analyses of Organizational Fields: A Blockmodel Approach,” Research in Organizational Behavior,8,335–370.
DiMaggio, P.M. and B. Rowan (1991), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–107.
Doreian, P., V. Batagelj and A. Ferligoj (1994), “Partitioning Networks Based on Generalized Concepts of Equivalence,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 19, 1–27.
Doreian, P., V. Batagelj and A. Ferligoj (2005), Generalized Blockmodeling.New York: Cambridge University Press. (Forthcoming).
Doreian, P. and F.N. Stokman (1997), “The Dynamics and Evolution of Social Networks,” in P. Doreian and F.N. Stokman (Eds.) Evolution of Social Networks,New York: Gordon and Breach, pp. 1–17.
Doreian, P. and K. Woodard (1992), “Fixed List Versus Snowball Selection of Social Networks,” Social Science Research, 216, 216–233.
Doreian, P. and K. Woodard (1999), “Local and Global Institutional Processes,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 59–83.
Drabek, T.E., H.L. Tamminga, T.S. Kilijanek and C.R. Adams (1981), Managing Multiorganizational Emergency Responses: Emergent Search and Rescue Networks in Natural Disaster and Remote Area Settings. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
Freeman, L.C. (1979), “Centrality in Social Networks: I. Conceptual Clarifications,” Social Networks,1,215–239.
Granovetter, M. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1287–1303.
Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
Greve, H.R. (2002), “Interorganizational Evolution,” in J.A.C. Baum(Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 559–578.
Gulati, R. and H. Singh (1998), “The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 781–814.
Hummon, N.P. and K. Carley (1993), “Social Networks as Normal Science,” Social Networks, 15, 71–106.
Laumann, E.O., J. Galaskiewicz and P.V. Marsden (1978), “Community Structure and Interorganizational Relations,” Annual Review of Sociology,4,455–484.
Lorrain, F. and H.C. White (1971), “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology,1,49–80.
Meyer, J.W. and B. Rowan (1991), “Institutionized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,” in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 41–62.
Pfeffer, J. (1987), “Bringing the Environment Back In: The Social Context of Business,” in D.J. Teece (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Grand Rapids: Harper and Row, pp. 119–135.
Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr (1996), “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Lo-cus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145.
Powell, W.W. and L. Smith-Doerr (1994), “Networks of Economic Life,” in N. Smelser and R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Sociology.New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 368–402.
Rogers, D.L. (1974), “Sociometric Analysis of Interorganizational Relations,” Rural Sociology, 39, 487–503.
Scott, W.R. and J.W. Meyer (1991), “The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence,” in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 108–140.
Stephenson, K. and M. Zelen, (1989), “Rethinking Centrality: Methods and Applications,” Social Networks, 11, 1–37.
Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994), Social Network Analysis.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Whetten, D.A. (1981), “Interorganizational Relations: A Reviewof the Field,” Journal of Higher Education, 52(1)
White, D.R. and K.P. Reitz (1983), “Graph and Semigroup Homomorphisms on Networks of Relations,” Social Networks,5,193–234.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doreian, P., Fujimoto, K. Identifying Linking-Pin Organizations in Inter-Organizational Networks. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 10, 45–68 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000032579.62046.0b
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000032579.62046.0b