Skip to main content
Log in

Identifying Linking-Pin Organizations in Inter-Organizational Networks

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within the large literature on inter-organizational networks, there has been some discussion of linking-pin organizations and the role they play in integrating these networks. Based on this verbal specification of linking-pin organizations, we construct operational criteria and empirical methods for identifying these structurally important organizations in potentially large and complex inter-organizational networks. These methods are based on ideas drawn from blockmodeling, structural holes, centrality and centralization of networks, and identifying cut-points in networks. These methods are applied to a constructed example and then to real empirical inter-organizational networks. Implications and contrasts with other methods are discussed, together with some open problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, H.E. (1979), Organizations and Environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W.G.R. and C.J. Fombrun (1987), “Organizational Communities: An Ecological Perspective,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations,5,163–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H.E. and D.A. Whetten (1981), “Organization Sets, Action Sets and Networks: Making the Most of Simplicity,” in P. Nystrom and W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design, pp. 385–408.

  • Baker, W.E. and R.R. Faulkner (2002), “Interorganizational Networks,” in J.A.C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 520–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj, V. (1997), “Notes on Blockmodeling,” Social Networks, 19, 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj, V. and A. Mrvar (2003), Pajek: A Program for Large Network Analysis. Lubljana: University of Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj, V., P. Doreian and A. Ferligoj (1992b), “An Optimizational Approach to Regular Equivalence,” Social Networks, 14, 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj, V., A. Ferligoj and P. Doreian (1992a), “Direct and Indirect Methods for Structural Equivalence,” Social Networks, 14, 63–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti S.P. and M.E. Everett (1989), “The Class of Regular Equivalences: Algebraic Structure and Computation,” Social Networks, 11, 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti S.P., M.E. Everett and L.C. Freeman (2002), Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breiger, R.L., S.A. Boorman and P. Arabie (1975), “An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison to multidimensional scaling,” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 328–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (1976), “Positions in networks,” Social Forces, 55, 93–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (1992), Structural Holes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.M. (1986), “Structural Analyses of Organizational Fields: A Blockmodel Approach,” Research in Organizational Behavior,8,335–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.M. and B. Rowan (1991), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doreian, P., V. Batagelj and A. Ferligoj (1994), “Partitioning Networks Based on Generalized Concepts of Equivalence,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 19, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doreian, P., V. Batagelj and A. Ferligoj (2005), Generalized Blockmodeling.New York: Cambridge University Press. (Forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doreian, P. and F.N. Stokman (1997), “The Dynamics and Evolution of Social Networks,” in P. Doreian and F.N. Stokman (Eds.) Evolution of Social Networks,New York: Gordon and Breach, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doreian, P. and K. Woodard (1992), “Fixed List Versus Snowball Selection of Social Networks,” Social Science Research, 216, 216–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doreian, P. and K. Woodard (1999), “Local and Global Institutional Processes,” Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, T.E., H.L. Tamminga, T.S. Kilijanek and C.R. Adams (1981), Managing Multiorganizational Emergency Responses: Emergent Search and Rescue Networks in Natural Disaster and Remote Area Settings. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L.C. (1979), “Centrality in Social Networks: I. Conceptual Clarifications,” Social Networks,1,215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 81, 1287–1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985), “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H.R. (2002), “Interorganizational Evolution,” in J.A.C. Baum(Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 559–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. and H. Singh (1998), “The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 781–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummon, N.P. and K. Carley (1993), “Social Networks as Normal Science,” Social Networks, 15, 71–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E.O., J. Galaskiewicz and P.V. Marsden (1978), “Community Structure and Interorganizational Relations,” Annual Review of Sociology,4,455–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorrain, F. and H.C. White (1971), “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology,1,49–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W. and B. Rowan (1991), “Institutionized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,” in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1987), “Bringing the Environment Back In: The Social Context of Business,” in D.J. Teece (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal. Grand Rapids: Harper and Row, pp. 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and G. Salancik (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W., K.W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr (1996), “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Lo-cus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.W. and L. Smith-Doerr (1994), “Networks of Economic Life,” in N. Smelser and R. Swedberg (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Sociology.New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 368–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D.L. (1974), “Sociometric Analysis of Interorganizational Relations,” Rural Sociology, 39, 487–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. and J.W. Meyer (1991), “The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence,” in W.W. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 108–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, K. and M. Zelen, (1989), “Rethinking Centrality: Methods and Applications,” Social Networks, 11, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994), Social Network Analysis.New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D.A. (1981), “Interorganizational Relations: A Reviewof the Field,” Journal of Higher Education, 52(1)

  • White, D.R. and K.P. Reitz (1983), “Graph and Semigroup Homomorphisms on Networks of Relations,” Social Networks,5,193–234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doreian, P., Fujimoto, K. Identifying Linking-Pin Organizations in Inter-Organizational Networks. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 10, 45–68 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000032579.62046.0b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000032579.62046.0b

Navigation