Abstract
The Hamiltonian H specifies the energy levels and the time evolution of a quantum theory. It is an axiom of quantum mechanics that H be Hermitian. The Hermiticity of H guarantees that the energy spectrum is real and that the time evolution is unitary (probability preserving). In this talk we investigate an alternative formulation of quantum mechanics in which the mathematical requirement of Hermiticity is replaced by the more physically transparent condition of space-time reflection (PT) symmetry. We show that if the PT symmetry of a Hamiltonian H is not broken, then the spectrum of H is real. Examples of PT-symmetric non-Hermitian Hamiltonians are H=p 2+ix 3 and H=p 2-x 4. The crucial question is whether PT-symmetric Hamiltonians specify physically acceptable quantum theories in which the norms of states are positive and the time evolution is unitary. The answer is that a Hamiltonian that has an unbroken PT symmetry also possesses a physical symmetry that we call C. Using C, we show how to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite. The result is a new class of fully consistent complex quantum theories. Observables exhibit CPT symmetry, probabilities are positive, and the dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.M. Bender, S. Boettcher, and P.N. Meisinger: J. Math. Phys. 40 (1999) 2201.
C.M. Bender, D.C. Brody, L.P. Hughston, and B.K. Meister: Preprint (2003).
C.M. Bender, P.N. Meisinger, and Q. Wang: J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 (2003) 1029.
C.M. Bender and S. Boettcher: Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5243. 9)
P. Dorey, C. Dunning, and R. Tateo: J. Phys. A 34 (2001) L391; 5679.
G. Lévai and M. Znojil: J. Phys. A 33 (2000) 7165. C.M. Bender, G.V. Dunne, P.N. Meisinger, and M. Simsek: Phys. Lett. A 281 (2001) 311. B. Bagchi and C. Quesne: Phys. Lett. A 300 (2002) 18. D.T. Trinh: PhD Thesis, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis (2002), and references therein.
A. Mostafazadeh: J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 205; 2814; 3944; preprint (math-ph/0203041). Z. Ahmed: Phys. Lett. A 294 (2002) 287. G.S. Japaridze: J. Phys. A 35 (2002) 1709. M. Znojil: Preprint (math-ph/0104012). A. Ramirez and B. Mielnik: Working Paper 2002.
C.M. Bender, S. Boettcher, and V.M. Savage: J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000) 6381. C.M. Bender, S. Boettcher, P.N. Meisinger, and Q. Wang: Phys. Lett. A 302 (2002) 286.
G.A. Mezincescu: J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 (2000) 4911. C.M. Bender and Q. Wang: J. Phys. A 34 (2001) 3325.
P.A.M. Dirac: Proc. R. Soc. London A 180 (1942) 1.
C.M. Bender, D.C. Brody, and H.F. Jones: Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 270401; Am. J. Phys. (in press).
C.M. Bender, P.N. Meisinger, and Q. Wang: J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 (2003) 1973.
C.M. Bender, P.N. Meisinger, and Q. Wang: manuscript in preparation.
C.M. Bender, M.V. Berry, and A. Mandilara: J. Phys. A 35 (2002) L467.
R.F. Streater and A.S. Wightman: PCT, Spin & Statistics, and all that, Benjamin, New York, 1964.
T.T. Wu: Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 1390.
T. Hollowood: Nucl. Phys. B 384 (1992) 523.
R. Brower, M. Furman, and M. Moshe: Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 213.
C.M. Bender, G.V. Dunne, and P.N. Meisinger: Phys. Lett. A 252 (1999) 272.
C.M. Bender, P. Meisinger, and H. Yang: Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 45001.
C.M. Bender, K.A. Milton, and V.M. Savage: Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 85001.
C.M. Bender and K.A. Milton: J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32 (1999) L87.
C.M. Bender and K.A. Milton: Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 3595.
C.M. Bender, S. Boettcher, H.F. Jones, P.N. Meisinger, and M. Simsek: Phys. Lett. A 291 (2001) 197.
F.J. Dyson: Phys. Rev. 85 (1952) 631.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bender, C.M. PT Symmetry in Quantum Field Theory. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 54, 13–28 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CJOP.0000014363.56526.41
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CJOP.0000014363.56526.41