Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selection of Pacing Mode after Interruption of Atrioventricular Conduction for Atrial Fibrillation: Observations from the PA3 Clinical Trial

  • Published:
Cardiac Electrophysiology Review

Abstract

The optimal pacing mode for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) following AV junction ablation remains the subject of some debate. Recent clinical trials have not demonstrated a superior advantage of maintenance of sinus rhythm over the rate control approach. However, clinical trials in pacemaker populations have demonstrated that physiologic pacing reduces the probability of paroxysmal and persistent AF compared to ventricular pacing. In the second phase of the PA3 study, patients were randomized to DDDR versus VDD pacing in a cross over study design. Of the 67 patients randomized, 42% developed permanent AF within one year following ablation. AF frequency and burden increases early following AV junction ablation suggesting that ventricular pacing even in an atrial synchronous mode promotes AF. Given the high probability of permanent AF developing early following ablation, VVIR pacing appears to be the appropriate pacing mode for symptomatic patients undergoing total AV junction ablation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wood MA, Brown-Mahoney C, Kay GN, Ellenbogen KA. Clinical outcomes after ablation and pacing therapy for atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. Circulation 2000;101:1138–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gillis AM, Connolly SJ, Lacombe P, Philippon F, Dubuc M, Kerr CR, Yee R, Rose MS, Newman D, Kavanagh KM, Gardner MJ, Wyse DG for the PA3 Investigators. A randomized crossover comparison of DDDR versus VDD pacing post-AV node ablation for prevention of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2000;102:736–741.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brignole M, Gianfranchi L, Menozzi C, Alboni P, Musso G, Bongiorni MG, Gasparini M, Raviele A, Lolli G, Paparella N, Acquarone S. Assessment of atrio-ventricular junction ablation and DDDR mode-switching pacemaker versus pharmacological treatment in patients with severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A randomized controlled study. Circulation 1997;96:2613–2624.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gribbin GM, Bourke JP, McComb JM. Predictors of atrial rhythm after atrioventricular node ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias. Heart 1998;79:548–553.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gianfranchi L, Brignole M, Menozzi C, Lolli G, Bottoni N. Progression of permanent atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular junction ablation and dual chamber pacemaker implantation in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:351–354.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;5(347):1825–1833.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, Kingma JH, Kamp O, Kingma T, Said SA, Darmanata JI, Timmermans AJ, Tijssen JG, Crijns HJ. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1834–1840.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Connolly SJ,Kerr CR,Gent M,Roberts RS, Yusef S,Gillis AM,Sami MH,Talajic M,Tang AS,Klein GJ, Lau C,Newman DM for the CTOPP Investigators. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1385–1391.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, Silverman R, Leon A, Yee R, Marinchak RA, Flaker G, Schron E, Orav EJ, Hellkamp AS, Greer S, McAnulty J, Ellenbogen K, Ehlert F, Freedman RA, Estes NA 3rd, Greenspon A, Goldman L. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854–1862.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tang AS, Roberts RS, Kerr C, Gillis AM, Green MS, Talajic M, Yusuf S, Abdollah H, Gent M, Connolly SJ. Relationship between pacemaker dependency and the effect of pacing mode on cardiovascular outcomes. Circulation 2001;103:3081–3085.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gillis AM, Wyse DG, Connolly SJ, Dubuc M, Philippon F, Yee R, Lacombe P, Rose MS, Kerr CR for the Atrial Pacing Periablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PA3) Study Investigators. Atrial pacing peri-ablation for prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1999;99:2553–2558.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA, Mode Selection Trial Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003;107:2932–2937.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Willems R, Wyse DG, Gillis AM. Total AV nodal (TAVN) ablation worsens atrial fibrillation (AF) burden in patients with paroxysmal AF. Circulation 2002;19:II–406.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiovascular Research Group, The University of Calgary and Division of Cardiology, Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

    Anne M. Gillis

Authors
  1. Anne M. Gillis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gillis, A.M. Selection of Pacing Mode after Interruption of Atrioventricular Conduction for Atrial Fibrillation: Observations from the PA3 Clinical Trial. Card Electrophysiol Rev 7, 312–314 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023130.12304.e4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023130.12304.e4

Search

Navigation