Abstract
1. This paper revisits the so-called “receptor mosaic hypothesis” for memory trace formation in the light of recent findings in “functional (or interaction) proteomics.” The receptor mosaic hypothesis maintains that receptors may form molecular aggregates at the plasma membrane level representing part of the computational molecular networks.
2. Specific interactions between receptors occur as a consequence of the pattern of transmitter release from the source neurons, which release the chemical code impinging on the receptor mosaics of the target neuron. Thus, the decoding of the chemical message depends on the receptors forming the receptor mosaics and on the type of interactions among receptors and other proteins in the molecular network with novel long-term mosaics formed by their stabilization via adapter proteins formed in target neurons through the incoming neurotransmitter code. The internalized receptor heteromeric complexes or parts of them may act as transcription factors for the formation of such adapter proteins.
3. Receptor mosaics are formed both at the pre- and postsynaptic level of the plasma membranes and this phenomenon can play a role in the Hebbian behavior of some synaptic contacts. The appropriate “matching” of the pre- with the postsynaptic receptor mosaic can be thought of as the “clamping of the synapse to the external teaching signal.” According to our hypothesis the behavior of the molecular networks at plasma membrane level to which the receptor mosaics belong can be set in a “frozen” conformation (i.e. in a frozen functional state) and this may represent a mechanism to maintain constant the input to a neuron.
4. Thus, we are suggesting that molecular networks at plasma membrane level may display multiple “attractors” each of which stores the memory of a specific neurotransmitter code due to a unique firing pattern. Hence, this mechanism may play a role in learning processes where the input to a neuron is likely to remain constant for a while.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Agnati, L. F., Benfenati, F., Ferri, M., Morpurgo, A., Apolloni, B., and Fuxe, K. (2002). Molecular basis of learning and memory: Modeling based on receptor mosaics. In Apolloni, B., and Kurfess, F. (eds.), From Synapses to Rules: Discovering Symbolic Rules from Neural Processed Data, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York, pp. 165–195.
Agnati, L. F., Celani, M. F., and Fuxe, K. (1983a). Cholecystokinin peptides in vitro modulate the characteristics of striatal [3H] N-propylnorapomorphine binding sites. Acta Physiol. Scand. 118:79–81.
Agnati, L. F., Ferré, S., Cortelli, P., and Fuxe, K. (1995). A brief appraisal on some aspects of the receptor–receptor interaction. Neurochem. Int. 27:139–146.
Agnati, L. F., Ferré, S., Lluis, C., Franco, R., and Fuxe, K. (2003b). Molecular mechanisms and therapeutical implications of intramembrane receptor/receptor interactions among heptahelical receptors with examples from the striatopallidal GABA neurons. Pharmacol. Rev.
Agnati, L. F., Franzén, O., Ferré, S., Franco, R., and Fuxe, K. (2003a). Possible role of intramembrane receptor–receptor interactions in memory and learning via formation of long-lived heteromeric complexes: Focus on motor learning in basal ganglia. J. Neural Transm.
Agnati, L. F., Fuxe, K., Benfenati, F., Mutt, V., and Hökfelt, T. (1983b). Differential modulation by CCK-8 and CCK-4 of [3H]spiperone binding sites linked to dopamine and 5-HT receptors in the brain of the rat. Neurosci. Lett. 35:179–183.
Agnati, L. F., Fuxe, K., Zini, I., Lenzi, P., and Hökfelt, T. (1980). Aspects on receptor regulation and isoreceptor identification. Med. Biol. 58:182–187.
Agnati, L. F., Fuxe, K., Zoli, M., Rondanini, C., and ögren, S. O. (1982). New vistas on synaptic pasticity: Mosaic hypothesis on the engram. Med. Biol. 60:183–190.
Agnati, L. F., Zoli, M., Merlo Pich, E., Benfenati, F., and Fuxe, K. (1990). Aspects of neural plasticity in the central nervous system. VII. Theoretical aspects of brain communication and computation. Neurochem. Int. 16:479–500.
Aleksander I. (1997). Impossible Minds, Imperial College Press, London, UK.
Banks, R. E., Dunn, M. J., Hochstrasser, D. F., Sanchez, J. C., Blackstock, W., Pappin, D. J., and Selby, P. J. (2000). Proteomics: New perspectives, new biomedical opportunities. Lancet 356:1749–1756.
Bouvier, M. (2001). Oligomerization of G-protein-coupled transmitter receptors. Nat. Neurosci. 2:274–286.
Casadó, V., Cantí, C., Mallol, J., Canela, E. I., Lluis, C., and Franco, R. (1990). Solubilization of A1 adenosine receptor from pig brain. Characterization and evidence of the role of the cell membrane on the coexistence of the high and low-affinity states. J. Neurosci. Res. 26:461–473.
Chao, M. V., and Bothwell, M. (2002). Neurotrophins: To cleave or not to cleave. Neuron 33:9–12.
Ciruela, F., Saura, C., Canela, E. I., Mallol, J., Lluis, C., and Franco, R. (1996). Adenosine deaminase affects ligand-induced signalling by interacting with cell surface adenosine receptors. FEBS Lett. 380:219–223.
Ferré, S., Torvinen, M., Antoniou, K., Irenius, E., Civelli, O., Arenas, E., Fredholm, B. B., and Fuxe, K. (1998). Adenosine A1 receptor-mediated modulation of dopamine D1 receptors in stably cotransfected fibroblast cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273:4718–4724.
Franco, R., Casadó, V., Ciruela, F., Mallol, J., Lluís, C., and Canela, E. I. (1996) The cluster-arranged cooperative model: A model that accounts for the kinetics of binding to A1 adenosine receptors. Biochemistry 35:3007–3015.
Franco, R., Valenzuela, A., Lluís, C., and Blanco, R. (1998). Enzymatic and extraenzymatic role of ecto-adenosine deaminase in lymphocytes. Immunol. Rev. 161:27–42.
Frauenfelder, H., Sligar, S. G., and Wolynes, P. G. (1991). The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 254:1598–1603.
Fuxe, K., and Agnati, L. F. (1985). Receptor–receptor interactions in the central nervous system. A new integrative mechanism in synapses. Med. Res. Rev. 5:441–482.
Fuxe, K., and Agnati, L. F. (1987). Receptor–Receptor Interactions. A New Intramembrane Integrative Mechanism, Macmillan Press, London, UK.
Fuxe, K., Agnati, L. F., Benfenati, F., Celani, M. F., Zini, I., Zoli, M., and Mutt, V. (1983). Evidence for the existence of receptor–receptor interactions in the central nervous system. Studies on the regulation of monoamine receptors by neuropeptides. J. Neural Transm. 18:165–179.
Ginés, S., Hillion, J., Torvinen, M., LeCrom, S., Casado, V., Canela, E., Rondin, S., Lew, J., Watson, S., Zoli, M., Agnati, L. F., Vernier, P., Lluis, C., Ferré, S., Fuxe, K., and Franco, R. (2000). Dopamine D1 and adenosine A1 receptors assemble into functionally interacting heteromeric complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97:8606–8611.
Gouldson, P. R, Higgs, C., Smith, R. E., Dean, M. K., Gkoutos, G. V., and Reynolds, C.A. (2000). Dimerization and domain swapping in G-protein-coupled receptors: A computational study. Neuropsychopharmacology 23:60–77.
Gouldson, P. R., Snell, C. R., Bywater, R. P., Higgs, C., and Reynolds, C. A. (1998). Domain swapping in G-protein coupled receptor dimers. Protein Eng. 11:1181–1193.
Grant, S., and Blackstock, W. (2001). Proteomics in neuroscience: From protein to network. J. Neurosci. 21:8315–8318.
Grant, S. G. N., and Husi, H. (2001). Proteomics of multiprotein complexes: Answering fundamental questions in neuroscience. Trends Biotech. 19:49–54.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory, Wiley, New York.
Hillion, J., Canals, M., Torvinen, M., Casado, V., Scott, R., Terasmaa, A., Hansson, A., Watson, S., Olah, M. E., Mallol, J., Canela, E. I., Zoli, M., Agnati, L. F., Ibanez, C. F., Lluis, C., Franco, R., Ferré, S., and Fuxe, K. (2002). Coaggregation, cointernalization and codesensitization of adenosine A2A receptors and dopamine D2 receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 277:18091–18097.
Hunt, D. F. (2002). Personal commentary on proteomics. J. Proteome. Res. 1:15–19.
Kauffman, S. (1993). The Origin of Order, Oxford University Press, New York.
Kenakin, T. (1997). Agonist-specific receptor conformations. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18:416–417.
Lee, H. J., Jung, K. M., Huang, Y. Z., Bennett, L. B., Lee, J. S., Mei, L., and Kim, T. W. (2002). Presenilin-dependent gamma-secretase-like intramembrane cleavage of ErbB-4. J. Biol. Chem. 277:6318–6232.
Lefkowitz, R. J. (2000). The superfamily of heptahelical receptors. Nat. Cell Biol. 2:E133-E136.
Lin, S. Y., Makino, K., Xia, W., Matin, A., Wen, Y., Kwong, K. Y., Bourguignon, L., and Hung, M. C. (2001). Nuclear localization of EGF receptor and its potential new role as a transcription factor. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:802–808.
Marshall, F. H. (2001). Heterodimerization of G protein coupled receptors in the CNS. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 1:40–44.
Milligan, G., and White, J. H. (2001). Protein–protein interactions at G-protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 22:513–518.
Ni, C. Y., Murphy, M. P., Golde, T. E., and Carpenter, G. (2001). Gamma-secretase cleavage and nuclear localization of ErbB-4 receptor tyrosine kinase. Science 294:2179–2181.
Ni, C. Y., Yuan, H., and Carpenter, G. (in press). Role of the ErbB-4 carboxyterminus in gamma-secretase cleavage. J. Biol. Chem.
Offterdinger, M., Schöfer, C., Weipoltshammer, K., and Grunt, T. W. (2002). c-erbB-3: A nuclear protein in mammary epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 157:929–940.
Pagano, A., Rovelli, G., Mosbacher, J., Lohmann, T., Duthey, B., Stauffer, D., Ristig, D., Schuler, V., Meigel, I., Lampert, C., Stein, T., Prezeau, L., Blahos, J., Pin, J., Froestl, W., Kuhn, R., Heid, J., Kaupmann, K., and Bettler, B. (2001). C-terminal interaction is essential for surface trafficking but not for heteromeric assembly of GABA(b) receptors. J. Neurosci. 21:1189–1202.
Parmentier, M. L., Prezeau, L., Bockaert, J., and Pin, J. P. (2002). A model for the functioning of family 3 GPCRs. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 23:268–274.
Pawson, T. (1995). Protein modules and signalling networks. Nature 373:573–580.
Pierce, K. L., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (2001). Classical and new roles of §-arrestins in the regulation of G-protein-coupled receptors. Neuroscience 2:727–733.
Reilly, J. F., and Maher, P. A. (2001). Importin beta-mediated nuclear import of fibroblast growth factor receptor: Role in cell proliferation. J. Cell Biol. 152:1307–1312.
Robbins, M. J., Ciruela, F., Rhodes, A., and McIlhinney, R. A. (1999). Characterization of the dimerization of metabotropic glutamate receptors using an N-terminal truncation of mGluR1alpha. J. Neurochem. 72:2539–2547.
Rostene, W. H., Fischette, C. T., and McEwen, B. S. (1983). Modulation by VIP of serotonin receptors in membranes from rat hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 3:2414–2419.
Stock, J. (1996). Receptor signalling: Dimerization and beyond. Curr. Biol. 6:825–827.
Torvinen, M., Ginés, S., Hillion, J., Latini, S., Canals, M., Ciruela, F., Bordoni, F., Staines, W., Pedata, F., Agnati, L. F., Lluis, C., Franco, R., Ferré, S., and Fuxe, K. (2002). Interactions among adenosine deaminase, adenosine A1 receptors and dopamine D1 receptors in stably cotransfected fibroblast cells and neurons. Neuroscience 113:709–719.
Wang, X. J. (2001). Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity. Trends Neurosci. 24:455–463.
Wess, J. (1998). Molecular basis of receptor/G protein-coupling selectivity. Pharmacol. Ther. 80:231–264.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agnati, L.F., Ferré, S., Leo, G. et al. On the Molecular Basis of the Receptor Mosaic Hypothesis of the Engram. Cell Mol Neurobiol 24, 501–516 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEMN.0000023626.35717.5d
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEMN.0000023626.35717.5d