Skip to main content
Log in

Challenges in Disseminating Model Programs: A Qualitative Analysis of the Strengthening Washington DC Families Program

  • Published:
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the challenges faced when a popular model program, the Strengthening Families Program, which in the past has been implemented on a smaller scale in single organizations, moves to a larger, multiorganization endeavor. On the basis of 42 interviews conducted with program staff, the results highlight two main themes that address program and organizational characteristics. The themes relate to the cultural relevance of the program, the accessibility of program partners, the organization of program services, and the coordination of program activities. The article also offers a discussion of how to better prepare sites for program delivery. This discussion focuses explicitly on the need for good communication among program partners, extensive community outreach, and the ability to secure additional resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

EFERENCES

  • Aktan, G. (1995). Organizational framework for a substance use prevention program. International Journal of Addiction, 30 ,185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktan, G., Kumpfer, K. L., & Turner, C. (1996). Effectiveness of a family skills training program for substance abuse prevention with inner city African-American families. International Journal of Addictions, 31 ,158–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, J. (2002). The nurse home visitation program. In S. L. Isaacs & J. R. Knickman (Eds.), To improve health and health care. Volume V: The Robert Wood Johnson anthology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglan, A., & Metzler, C. W. (1998). A public health perspective for research on family-focused interventions. In R. Ashery, E. B. Robertson, & K. Kumpfer (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention through family interventions(pp. 430–458). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvin, G. J. (2003). From research to policy: Advancing prevention science and practice. Presidential address presented at the 11th annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC.

  • Brewer, D. D., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Neckerman, H. J. (1995). Preventing serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offending: A review of evaluations of selected strategies in childhood, adolescence, and the community. In J. C. Howell, B. Krisberg, J. J. Wilson, & J. D. Hawkins (Eds.), A sourcebook on serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders(pp. 61–141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review, 18 ,23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. (2001). Five Feathers Program: A culturally sensitive family strengthening program. Paper presented at Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID.

  • Firestone, P., & Witt, J. E. (1982). Characteristics of families completing and prematurely discontinuing a behavioral parent-training program. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 7 ,209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, R., Middlebrook, J., Rogers, T., & Steffe, M. (1983). Dropping out of parent training. Behavior Research and Therapy, 21 ,663–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgatch, M. S., Patterson, G. R., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2003). Evaluating fidelity: Predictive validity for a measure of competent adherence to the Oregon model of parent management training.Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Gottfredson, D. C., Kumpfer, K. L., Polizzi, D., Wilson, D., Puryear, V., Beatty, P., et al. (2002, November). The Strengthening. Washington D.C. Families Project: Preliminary results from a randomized effectiveness trial of three types of family prevention}.Technical report available for the authors.

  • Harachi, T. W., Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1997). Effective recruitment for parenting programs within ethnic minority communities.Childhood and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 14 ,23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S., Proskauer, S., & Kumpfer, K. L. (1995). Final evaluation report on Utah CSAP/CYAP project.Report submitted to the Utah State Division of Substance Abuse. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, Social Research Institute.

  • Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W., & Catalano, R. F. (1995). Preventing substance abuse. In M. Tonry & D. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention(pp. 343–427). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Brondino, M. J., & Schere, D. G. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65 ,821–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogue, A., Johnson-Leckrone, J., & Liddle, H. A. (1999). Recruiting high-risk families in family-based prevention and prevention research. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 41 ,337–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameoka, V. A. (1996). The effects of a family-focused intervention on reducing risk for substance abuse among Asian and Pacific-Island youths and families: Evaluation of the strengthening Hawaii's families project.Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii, Social Welfare Evaluation and Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L. (1991). Howto get hard to reach parents involved in parenting programs. In D. Pines (Ed.), Parent training is prevention: Preventing alcohol and other drug problems among youth in the family(pp. 87–95). Rockville, MD: Office of Substance Abuse Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., & Alvarado, R. (2003). Family interventions for the prevention of drug abuse [Special issue]. American Psychologist, 58 ,457–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., Smith, P., & Bellamy, N. (2002). Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions. Prevention Science, 3 ,241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., Tait, C., & Turner, C. (2002). Effectiveness of school-based family and children's skills training for substance abuse prevention among 6-8 year old rural children. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16 ,65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., & DeMarsh, J. P. (1985). Prevention of chemical dependency in children of alcohol and drug abusers. NIDA Notes, 5 ,2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumpfer, K. L., DeMarsh, J. P., & Child, W. (1989). Strengthening families program: Children's Skill Training Curriculum Manual, Parent Training Manual, Children's Skill Training Manual, and Family Skills Training Manual (Prevention Services to Children of Substance-Abusing Parents). Salt Lake City, UT: Department of Health, Alcohol and Drug Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartman, L. V. Hedges, R. V. Light, et al. (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook(pp. 83–128). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent and serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions(pp. 86–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: Asynthesis of research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful intervention(pp. 313–345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, R. J. (1999). Parent training. In S. W. Russ & T. H. Ollendick (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapies with children and families(pp. 153–180). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mindel, C. H., & Hoefer, R. A. (2002, July). An evaluation of a family strengthening program to substance abuse offenders.Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Evaluation for Practice, Tampere, Finland.

  • Mooney, S. (1995). Parent training: Areview of Adlerian, parent effectiveness training, and behavioral research. Family Journal-Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 3,218–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, H., & Wojcicki, M. (1991). Reaching and retaining high-risk youth and their parents in prevention programs. In E. N. Goplerud (Ed.), Preventing adolescent drug use: From theory to practice(pp. 91–126; Prevention Monograph No. 8). Rockville, MD: Office for Substance Abuse Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations(4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotheram-Borus, M. J., & Duan, N. (2003). Next generation of preventive interventions. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 42 ,518–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. R. (1996). New directions in behavioral family interventions with children. In T. H. Ollendick, R. J. Prinz, et al. (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology(Vol. 18, pp. 283–330). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serketich, W., & Dumas, J. E. (1996). The effectiveness of behavioral parent training to modify antisocial behavior in children: A meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy, 27 ,171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Goldberg, C., & Redmond, C. (1999). Engaging families in longitudinal intervention research: Discrete-time survival analysis of socioeconomic and social-emotional factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67 ,157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1996). Illustrating a framework for rural prevention research: Project Family studies of rural family participation and outcomes. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency(pp. 299–328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Hockaday, C., & Shin, C. Y. (1996). Barriers to participation in family skills preventive interventions and their evaluations: Areplication and extension. Family Relations, 45 ,247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., Kahn, J. H., & Shin, C. (1997). A prospective validation study of inclination, belief, and context predictors of family-focused prevention involvement. Family Process, 36 ,403–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, N. S., & Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18 ,71–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R. E., & Craig, W. M. (1995). Developmental crime prevention. In M. Tonry & D. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention(pp. 151–236). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau. (n.d.). 2000 summary file of selected social characteristics and general demographic characteristics. Retrieved July 3, 2003, from http://factfinder.census.gov

  • Webster-Stratton, C., & Taylor, T. (2001). Nipping early risk factors in the bud: Preventing substance abuse, delinquency, and violence in adolescence through interventions targeted at young children (0-8 years old). Prevention Science, 2 ,165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitbeck, L., & Smith, J. (2001). Outcomes of a culturally-modified family program for Ojibway Indian families. Washington, DC: Society for Prevention Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fox, D.P., Gottfredson, D.C., Kumpfer, K.K. et al. Challenges in Disseminating Model Programs: A Qualitative Analysis of the Strengthening Washington DC Families Program. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 7, 165–176 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CCFP.0000045125.68018.61

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CCFP.0000045125.68018.61

Navigation