Skip to main content
Log in

Adolescents' Satisfaction with Contact in Adoption

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current investigation drew from the second wave of data collected from the Minnesota-Texas Adoption Research Project (MTARP). Adolescents involved in adoptive arrangements in which there is contact with birth parents were compared to adolescents who do not have contact with their birth parents in terms of satisfaction with adoption openness. ANOVA results indicated that adolescents who have contact with their birthmothers maintain higher satisfaction with contact status than those who do not have contact. No effects for gender or age were noted. In terms of contact with birthfathers, adolescents with contact maintained higher satisfaction with contact status than those who do not have contact. Significant effects for age were also noted, insofar as satisfaction with contact increases with age. Implications of these findings for adoption professionals are put forth, as well as directions for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belbas, N. F. (1987). Staying in touch: Empathy in open adoptions. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 57, 184-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M., Dylla, D. J. C., Barth, R. P., & Needell, B. (1998). The roles of open adoption in the adjustment of adopted children and their families. Children and Youth Services Review, 20, 151-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, J., Beckett, C., Groothues, C., & the English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) team (2000a). Infant adoption in England: A longitudinal account of social and cognitive processes. Adoption & Fostering, 24, 26-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, J., Beckett, C., Groothues, C., & the English and Romanian Adoptees (ERA) team (2000b). Infant adoption in England: Policy and practice at placement. Adoption & Fostering, 24, 45-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C., Dorner, P., Silber, K., & Winterberg, T. S. (1986). Meeting the needs of the adoption triangle through open adoption: The birthmother. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 3, 203-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C., Dorner, P., Silber, K., & Winterberg, T. S. (1987). Meeting the needs of the adoption triangle through open adoption: The adoptive parents. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 4, 3-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, D. (1986). The debate over open adoption: How people feel about adoption seems to depend on their point of view. Public Welfare, 44, 11-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, H. (1997). Contact: The social workers' experience. Adoption & Fostering, 21, 34-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, P. A. (1986). The dialectics of open versus closed adoption of infants. Child Welfare, 115, 437-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, N., van Dulmen, M. H. M., Ayers-Lopez, S., Berge, J. M., Christian, C., Fitzgerald, N., Gossman, G., Henney, S., Mendenhall, T., Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (2000, November). Openness changes in adoptive kinship network connections. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Minneapolis, MN.

  • Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute (1999). Openness in adoption and post-adoption contact agreements: A review of the empirical research and current state law. New York:Evan B. Donaldson Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute (2002, June). National adoption attitudes survey: Research report. New York:Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratter, J. (1991). Parties in the triangle. Adoption and Fostering, 15, 91-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, H. E. (1993). Open adoption: A research-based literature review and new data. Child Welfare, 77, 269-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (1998). Openness in adoption: Exploring family connections. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, H. D., McRoy, R. G., Elde, C., L., & Fravel, D. L. (1994). Adoptive family system dynamics: Variations by level of openness in the adoption. Family Process, 33, 125-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, H. D., Ross, N. M., Marchel, M. A., & McRoy, R. G. (1999). Adaptive behavior in adopted children: Predictors from early risk, balance of relationships in the adoptive kinship network, and openness arrangements. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 231-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henney, S. M., Onken, S., McRoy, R. G., & Grotevant, H. D. (1998). Changing agency practices toward openness in adoption. Adoption Quarterly, 1, 45-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, B. (1995). Openness and contact in adoption: A child-centered perspective. British Journal of Social Work, 25, 729-747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, A. D., Palombo, J., Mitchell, D. L., Woods, P. K., & Schmidt, A. W. (1985a). Some theoretical considerations on confidential adoptions, Part I: The birthmother. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2, 13-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, A. D., Palombo, J., Mitchell, D. L., Woods, P. K., & Schmidt, A. W. (1985b). Some theoretical considerations on confidential adoptions, Part II: The adoptive parents. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2, 69-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, A. D., Palombo, J., Mitchell, D. L., Woods, P. K., & Schmidt, A. W. (1985c). Some theoretical considerations on confidential adoptions, Part III: The adopted child. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 2, 139-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. (1999). Exchanging information post adoption: Views of adoptive parents and birth parents. Adoption & Fostering, 23, 27-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, C. E. (1998). Community assessments of adoption issues: Open adoption, birth reunions, and the disclosure of confidential information. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 556-577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neil, E. (2000a). Contact with birth relatives after adoption: A study of young, recently placed children. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

  • Neil, E. (2000b). The reasons why young children are placed for adoption: Findings from a recently placed sample and implications for future identity issues. Child and Family Social Work, 5, 303-316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, W. L. (1999). Twenty-one barriers to adoption to address in the twenty-first century. In C. Murshner and W. L. Pierce (eds.), Adoption Factbook III (pp. 556-587). Washington, D. C.:National Council for Adoption.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryburn, M. (1995). Adopted children's identity and information needs. Children & Society, 9, 41-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, M. (2000). Adoption with contact: A study of adoptive parents and the impact of continuing contact with families of origin. Adoption & Fostering, 24, 20-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel, G. M., Ayers-Lopez, S., Grotevant, H. D., McRoy, R. G., & Friedrick, M. (1996). Openness in adoption and the level of child participation. Child Development, 67, 2358-2374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel, G. M., Kohler, J. K., Grotevant, H. D., & McRoy, R. G. (1998). Factors related to patterns of information exchange between adoptive parents and children in mediated adoptions. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 19, 641-657.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mendenhall, T.J., Berge, J.M., Wrobel, G.M. et al. Adolescents' Satisfaction with Contact in Adoption. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 21, 175–190 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CASW.0000022730.89093.b7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CASW.0000022730.89093.b7

Navigation