Skip to main content
Log in

A Device and a Method for Simulating Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Pacemakers Implanted in Patients: Assessment of Safety and Reliability

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Engineering: An International Journal

Abstract

Automatic mode switching, enabling the pacemaker to pace at an independent ventricular rate when atrial fibrillation occurs, was introduced to provide protection against rapid ventricular pacing during atrial arrhythmia. This study proposes a technique to test automatic mode switching performance. It is based on a programmable system (Arrhythmia Simulator) generating pulse trains that, when applied to the patient's skin, may interfere with the implanted device simulating supraventricular arrhythmias. The amplitude of the output signals is 5 V and they are delivered through an output resistance of 50 kΩ limiting the current to 100 μA that guarantees no risk of muscle stimulation during the test and meanwhile low noise signals on the surface ECG. The duration of pulses is 20 ms. Pulses delivered by the Arrhythmia Simulator were correctly sensed by the pacemaker's atrial channel, and the detected amplitude was 2 ± 0.8 mV, ranging from 1 to 3 mV. The performance of the system was reliable and safe in every patient despite the use of different pacemaker leads. Automatic mode switching was induced in every patient at every attempt. The pulses delivered by Arrhythmia Simulator didn't alter the quality of ECG tracings making easy and reliable the analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PEB, Thuesen L, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK, and Mortensen PT. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sicksinus syndrome. Lancet 350: 1210-1216, 1997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin EJ, Levy D, Vaziri SM, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, and Wolf PA. Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Study. JAMA 271: 840-844, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt J, and Worzewski W. Far-Field QRS complex sensing: Prevalence and timing with bipolar atrial leads. PACE 23: 315-320, 2000.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brignole M, Gianfranchi L, Menozzi C, Alboni P, Musso G, Bongiorni MG, Gasparini M, Raviele A, Lolli G, Paparella N, and Acquarone S. Assessment of atrioventricular junction ablation and DDDR mode-switching pacemaker versus pharmacological treatment in patients with severely symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A randomized controlled study. Circulation 96: 2617-2624, 1997.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cools FJC, Van Twembeke RRC, Backers J, and Verpooten GA. Stability of far field R wave signals in different conditions. Europace 5: 175-183, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • den Dulk K, Dijkman B, Pieterse M, and Wellens H. Initial experience with mode switching in a dual sensor, dual chamber pacemaker in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. PACE 17(II): 1900-1907, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbogen KA, Mond HG, Wood MA, and Barold SS. Failure of automatic mode switching: Recognition and management. PACE 20(I): 268-275, 1997.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fantini F, Franchi F, and Padeletti L. External thoracic stimulation (chest wall stimulation) in patients implanted with a demand pacemaker. Bollettino della Societ`a Italiana di Cardiologia, XVII: 237-242, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, and Hart RG. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications. Arch Intern Med 155: 469-473, 1995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher M, and Camm AJ. Classification of atrial fibrillation. PACE 20: 1603-1605, 1997.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giudici MC, Orias DW. Mode switching anomalies: A patient who remained symptomatic during paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias despite a mode switching pacemaker. PACE 20: 1883-1884, 1997.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goethals M, Timmermans W, Geelen P, Backers J, and Brugada P. Mode switching failure during atrial flutter: The ‘2: 1 lock-in’ phenomenon. Europace 5: 95-102, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoratos G, Abrams J, Epstein AE, Freedman RA, Hayes DL, Hlatky MA, Kerber RE, Naccarelli GV, Schoenfeld MH, Silka MJ, and Winters SL. ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 guideline update for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee on Pacemaker Implantation). Circulation 106: 2145-2161, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamalvand K, Tam K, Kotsakis K, Bucknall C, and Sulke N. Is mode switching beneficial? A randomized study in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. JACC 30: 496-504, 1997.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lau CP, Leung SK, Tse HF, and Barold SS. Automatic mode switching of implantable pacemakers: I. PACE 25: 967-985, 2002a.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lau CP, Leung SK, Tse HF, and Barold SS. Automatic mode switching of implantable pacemakers: II. PACE 25: 1094-1113, 2002b.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leung SK, Lau CP, Lam CTF, Tse HF, Lee K, Chan WK, and Leung Z. Is automatic mode switching effective for atrial arrhythmias occurring at different rates? A study of the efficacy of automatic mode and rate switching to simulated atrial arrhythmias by chest wall stimulation. PACE 23: 824-831, 2000.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Le'vy S, Camm AJ, Saksena S, Aliot E, Breithardt G, Crijns H, Davies W, Kay N, Prystowsky E, Sutton R, Waldo A, and Wyse DG. International consensus on nomenclature and classification of atrial fibrillation. A collaborative project of the Working Group on Arrhythmias and the Working Group on Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Europace 5: 119-122, 2003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mascia F, Viscusi M, Pandolfi M, Orazi S, and Corbucci G. Beat-to-beat switch-mode: A safe protection against interferences in patients with unipolar atrial leads. In Adornato, E, Ed., Proceedings of the VI Southern Symposium on Cardiac Pacing. Edizioni: Luigi Pozzi, pp. 85-88, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maury P, Schlaepfer J, Arbane M, Girod G, and Kappenberger L. Incessant atrioventricular dissociation due to far-field QRS oversensing and recurrent mode switch in a dual chamber pacemaker. Europace 4: 149-153, 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Padeletti L, Gasparini M, Porciani MC, Pieragnoli P, Colella A, Michelucci A, Proclemer A, Tognarini S, Mantica M, Coltorti F, Corbucci G, and Sutton R. How to test mode switching in pacemakers implanted in patients: The MOST study. PACE 25: 156-160, 2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savelieva I and Camm AJ. Clinical relevance of silent atrial fibrillation: Prevalence, prognosis, quality of life, and management. J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol 4: 369-382, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tronconi, F., Porciani, M.C., Gianfranchi, L. et al. A Device and a Method for Simulating Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Pacemakers Implanted in Patients: Assessment of Safety and Reliability. Cardiovascular Engineering 4, 219–227 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CARE.0000038778.66625.f6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CARE.0000038778.66625.f6

Navigation