Abstract
Background: Ultrasound (US) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are the two most commonly prescribed procedures for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). We have demonstrated the feasibility of multimodality registration of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cardiac US images with cardiac SPECT images with an aim to simultaneously present the complementary anatomical and perfusion information from the two modalities. We have also tested the clinicians' assessment of the clinical adequacy of the registered images. Methods and Results: We have demonstrated temporal and spatial registration for nine sets of cardiac US and SPECT cine loops covering the entire cardiac cycle. Temporal alignment was performed by interpolation of existing SPECT images at cardiac phases corresponding to available US images. Spatial registration was performed in 3D image space using a mutual information-based approach. Experts from echocardiography and nuclear medicine determined the clinical utility of the registration by rating each registration on a scale of 1 to 5, a rating of 3 or above indicating clinical utility. 2DUS-SPECT registration (five cases) received an average rating of 4.2, whereas 3DUS-SPECT registration (four cases) received an average rating of 2.85. By one-sample t test, the overall evaluations (mean 3.58) were greater than the pre-specified clinical cut-off of 3 with p < 0.05, indicating likelihood of clinical utility. Conclusion: Our method demonstrates the feasibility of registering cardiac US and SPECT images in their present as well as possible future forms. Such registration has the potential to provide a more accurate and powerful tool for diagnosing CAD.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
2001 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update, American Heart Association.
Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, Douglas PS. Exercise echocardiography or SPECT imaging meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 1998; 280(10): 913–920.
Lange K, Carson R. EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Compu Assist Tomog 1987; 8: 306–316.
Shekhar R, Zagrodsky V. Interactive visualization of fourdimensional ultrasound data. Proc of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, 2002.
Shekhar R, Zagrodsky V. Mutual information based rigid and non-rigid registration of ultrasound volumes. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002; 21(1): 9–22.
Gilardi MC, Rizzo G, Savi A, Fazio F. Registration of multi-modal biomedical images of the heart. Quat J Nuc Med 1996; 40: 142–150.
Rakotobe RH, Marek A, Boulet A, Langevin F, Fernandez C, Fauchet M. Echocardiography and TI-201 SPECT cardiac images registration using elliptical models. Annu Int Conf IEEE End Med Biol Soc Proc 1994; 16: 604–605.
Faber TL, McColl RW, Opperman RM, Corbett JR, Peshock RM. Spatial and temporal registration of cardiac SPECT and MR images, methods and evaluation. Radiology 1991; 179(3): 857–861.
Wells WM III, Viola P, Atsumi H, Nakajima S, Kikinis R. Multimodal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med Image Anal 1996; 1(1): 35–51.
West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY, et al. Retrospective intermodality registration techniques: surface-based versus volume-based. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999; 18(2): 144–<nt> </nt>150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walimbe, V., Zagrodsky, V., Raja, S. et al. Mutual information-based multimodality registration of cardiac ultrasound and SPECT images: a preliminary investigation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 19, 483–494 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CAIM.0000004325.48512.5a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CAIM.0000004325.48512.5a