Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of a community-based oral cancer awareness campaign (United States)

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide the first systematic evaluation in the United States of a community-based oral cancer awareness campaign. Methods: We used a non-equivalent control group design and random-digit-dialing methods to examine billboard effectiveness and pre- and post-billboard impact between intervention and control counties in adult probability samples in Florida, USA. Results: Respondents in the intervention county were more likely than controls to correctly identify the billboard message to get tested for oral cancer, and less likely than controls to report ever having an oral cancer examination, or to have heard of oral cancer. Results of pre-post analyses within each county showed that oral cancer examinations were significantly more frequent in both counties after the campaign. There were no significant differences between counties on the proportion of individuals who reported having seen the campaign or on any other item measuring billboard awareness or impact. Conclusions: Results suggest the Florida billboard campaign had limited success in increasing public awareness. Future cancer awareness campaigns should incorporate theoretical models, target high-risk groups and the broader community and provide culturally relevant messages as part of a multi-media campaign.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society(2003) Cancer Facts &; Figures, 2003. Atlanta, GA: ACS.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group(2002) United States Cancer Statistics: 1999 Incidence. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al. (eds) (2003) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2000, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Silverman S Jr (2001) Demographics and occurrence of oral and pharyngeal cancers: the outcomes, the trends, the challenge. J Am Dent Assoc 132: 7S-11S.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horowitz AM, Alfano MC (2001) Performing a death-defying act. J Am Dent Assoc 132: 5S-6S.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Regan B, Wootan MG, Booth-Butterfield S (2000) A comparison of different approaches to promote community-wide dietary change. Am J Prev Med 18(4): 271-275.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lashuay N, Tjoa T, Zuniga de Nuncio JL, Franklin M, Elder J, Jones M (2000) Exposure to immunization media messages among African American parents. Prev Med 31: 522-528.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pederson LL, Ahluwalia JS, Harris KJ, McGrady GA (2000) Smoking cessation among African Americans: what we know and do not know about interventions and self-quitting. Prev Med 31: 23-38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mastro DE, Atkin C (2002) Exposure to alcohol billboards and beliefs and attitudes toward drinking among Mexican American high school students. Howard J Commun 13: 129-151.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bal DG, Kiser KW, Felten PG, Mozar HN, Niemeyer D (1990) Reducing tobacco consumption in California. JAMA 264: 1570-1574.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flynn BS, Worden JK, Secker-Walker RH, Badger GJ, Geller BM, Costanza MC (1992) Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs. Am J Public Health 82: 1148-1150.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Donthu N, Cherian J, Bhargav M (1993) Factors influencing recall of outdoor advertising. J Advert Res May/June: 64-72.

  13. Schooler C, Basil MD, Altman DG (1996) Alcohol and cigarette advertising on billboards: targeting with social cues. Health Commun 8(2): 109-129.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bandura A (1986) Social Foundations of thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cli.s, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tomar SL (2000) Oral cancer risk factors and dental visits among US racial/ethnic groups. [Abstract 3281]. J Dent Res 79 (special issue): 554.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merzel C, D'Afflitti J (2003) Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. Am J Public Health 93(4): 557-574.

    Google Scholar 

  17. American Dental Association(2002) Campaign News: Media Plan ADA National Oral Cancer Awareness Campaign. http://www. ada.org/public/topics/cancer/news-03.html. Accessed.

  18. Campbell DT, Stanley JC (1963) Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  19. American Dental Association(2002) Oral cancer campaign: dentists report ADA message successful in raising awareness. ADA News.

  20. Berkowitz D, Allaway A, D'souza G (2001) Estimating differential lag effects for multiple media across multiple stores. J Advert 30(4): 59-65.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pollay RW (1990) The Functions and Management of Cigarette Advertising [monograph]. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hannon SW (2000) Background and principles of an African American targeted national anti-drug campaign. J Public Health Manag Pract 6(3): 65-71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrietta L. Logan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Papas, R.K., Logan, H.L. & Tomar, S.L. Effectiveness of a community-based oral cancer awareness campaign (United States). Cancer Causes Control 15, 121–131 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CACO.0000019474.98238.35

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CACO.0000019474.98238.35

Navigation