Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in youth smoking participation in California in the 1990s

  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To identify which key transitions in the adolescent smoking uptake process changed during periods of increasing and decreasing adolescent smoking participation in California. Methods: Age groups (12–14 and 15–17 years) from longitudinal surveys of California adolescents, conducted in 1993–1996 (prevalence increasing) and in 1996–1999 (prevalence declining), allowed comparisons of transition rates across these periods for: never smokers (committed and susceptible) to any smoking, experimenters to established smokers, and current established smokers to former smokers (15–17-year-olds only). Analyses adjusted for demographics and other baseline environmental influences on adolescents to smoke, with a variable for ‘time period’ included to test for differential period transition rates. Results: Adjusted analyses indicated a time period effect (1993–1996 versus 1996–1999) on all transitions examined for 12–14-year-olds. For 15–17-year-olds, the time period effect was significant for the transition from committed never smoker to any smoking, but only marginally significant for experimenter to established smoker and from current established to former smoker. Conclusion: Adolescent smoking participation appeared to decline at all phases in the smoking uptake process, with generally larger declines in younger adolescents. Intensified public health measures to curb adolescent smoking beginning in the mid 1990s may have been responsible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnston LD,O'Malley PM,Bachman JG (2002) Monitoring the Future: National Results on Drug Use, Overview of Key Findings. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. (NIH Publication No. 02-5105).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gilpin EA,Emery SL,Farkas AJ,Distefan JM,White MM,Pierce JP (2001) The California Tobacco Control Program: A Decade of Progress, Results from the California Tobacco Surveys 1990-1999. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego. http:// ssdc.ucsd.edu/tobacco

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leventhal H,Cleary PD (1989) The smoking problem: a review of the research and theory in behavioral risk modification. Psychol Bull 88: 370-405.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flay BR,D'Avernas JR,Best JR,Kersell MW,Ryan KB (1983) Cigarette smoking: why young people do it and ways of preventing it. In: McGrath PJ,Firetone P, eds. Pediatric and Adolescent Behaviorial Medicine, Vol. 10. Issues in treatment. Springer Series on Behavior Therapy and Behavioral Medicine. New York: Springer, pp. 132-183.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chassin L,Presson CC,Sherman SJ,Corty E,Olshavsky RW (1984) Predicting the onset of cigarette smoking in adolescents: a longitudinal study. J Appl. Soc Psychol 14: 224-243.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sussman S,Dent CW,Flay BR,Hassen WB,Johnson CA (1987) Psychosocial predictors of cigarette smoking onset by White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian adolescents in Southern California. MMWR 36: 11S-16S.

    Google Scholar 

  7. McNeill AD,Jarvis MJ,Stapleton JA, et al. (1988) Prospective study of factors predicting uptake of smoking in adolescents. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1988: 72-78.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pierce JP,Choi WS,Gilpin EA,Farkas AJ,Merritt RK (1996) Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the US. Health Psychol 15: 355-361.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Unger JB,Johnson Ca,Stoddard JL,Nezami E,Chou CP (1997) Identification of adolescents at risk for smoking initiation: validation of a measure of susceptibility. Addict Behav 22: 81-91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Choi WS,Gilpin EA,Farkas AJ,Pierce JP (2001) Determining the probability of future smoking among adolescents. Addiction 96: 313-323.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson C (1998) Cognitive susceptibility to smoking and initiation of smoking during childhood: a longitudinal study. Prev Med 27: 29-134.

    Google Scholar 

  12. US Department of Health and Human Service(1989) Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Public Health Services, Centers for Disease Control Office on Smoking and Health. (DHHS Pub. No. (CDC) 89-8411).

    Google Scholar 

  13. US Department of Health and Human Services(1990) The Health Benefits of Smoking Cessation. A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Public Health Services, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. (CHHS Pub. No. (CDC) 90-8416).

    Google Scholar 

  14. US Department of Health and Human Services(1994) Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. (US Government Printing Office Document N0 17-001-00491-0).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bal DG,Kizer KW,Felton PG,Mozar HN,Niemeyer D (1990) Reducing tobacco consumption in California. Development of a statewide anti-tobacco use campaign. JAMA 264: 1570-1574.

    Google Scholar 

  16. University of California, San Diego (1994, 1998) Final reports and technical documentation, questionnaires and data sets for the California Tobacco Surveys.http://ssdc.ucsd.edu/tobacco

  17. Unger JB,Johnson CA,Rohrbach LA (1995) Recognition and liking of tobacco and alcohol advertisements among adolescents: relationships with susceptibility to substance use. Prev Med 24: 461-466.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pierce JP,Choi WS,Gilpin EA,Farkas AJ,Berry CC (1998) Tobacco industry promotion of cigarettes and adolescent smoking. JAMA 279: 511-515.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sargent JD,Dalton M,Beach M,Bernhardt A,Heatherton T,Stevens M (2000) Effect of cigarette promotions on smoking uptake among adolescents. Prev Med 30: 320-327.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sargent JD,Dalton M,Beach M (2000) Exposure to cigarette promotions and smoking uptake in adolescents: evidence of a dose-response relation. Tob Control 9: 163-168.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Biener L,Siegel M (2000) Tobacco marketing and adolescent smoking: more support for a causal inference. Am J Pub Health 90: 407-411.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Efron B (1992) The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans CMBS Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, 38. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Brick JM,Broene P,James P,Severynse J (1996) A User's Guide to WesVarPC. Rockville, MD: Westat, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration(1996) Tobacco regulations for substance abuse prevention and treatment block grants: final rule. Fed Regist 61(13): 1492-1509.

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Association of Attorneys General (1998) Tobacco Settlement Summary.http://www.naag.org/glance.htm

  26. Cohen JB (2000) Playing to win: marketing and public policy at odds over Joe Camel. J Pub Policy Marketing 19: 155-167.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Glantz SA,Balbach ED (2000) Tobacco War. Inside the California Battles. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. American Lung Association, American Heart Association, and American Cancer Society(1996) State Legislated Actions on Tobacco Issues.

  29. California Department of Health Services(2002) California Tobacco Control Update 2002. California Department of Health Services/Tobacco Control Section. hauhttp://www.dhs.cahwnet.gov/ tobacco

  30. Federal Trade Commission(2001) Federal Trade Commission Report to Congress. Pursuant to the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lewitt EM,Coate D,Grossman M (1981) The effects of government regulations on teenage smoking. J Law Econ 24: 545-569.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wasserman J,Manning W,Newhouse J,Winkler J (1991) The effects of excise taxes and regulations on cigarette smoking. J Health Econ 10: 43-64.

    Google Scholar 

  33. National Cancer Institute(1993) The Impact of Cigarette Excise Taxes on Smoking Among Children and Adults. Summary Report of a National Cancer Institute Expert Panel. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Cancer Control Science Program.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chaloupka F,Grossman M (1996) Price, Tobacco Control Policies and Youth Smoking. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 5740.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gruber J,Zinman J (2000) Youth Smoking in the US: Evidence and Implications. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 7780.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Velicer WF,Prochaska JO,Rossi JS,Snow MG (1992) Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. Psychol Bull 111: 23-41.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Emery S,White MM,Pierce JP (2001) Does cigarette price influence adolescent experimentation? J Health Econ 10: 261-270.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lewitt EM,Hyland A,Kerrebrock N,Cummings KM (1997) Price, public policy, and smoking in young people. Tob Control 6(Suppl 2): S17-S24.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liang L,Chaloupka FJ (2001) Differential Effects of Cigarette Price on Youth Smoking Intensity. Chicago, IL: ImpacTeen Research Paper Series, No. 6.

  40. Ross H,Chaloupka FJ (2001) The Effect of Public Policies and Prices on Youth Smoking. Chicago, IL: ImpacTeen Research Paper Series, No. 8.

  41. Ross H,Chaloupka FJ,Wakefield M (2001) Youth Smoking Uptake Progress: Price and Public Policy Effects. Chicago, IL: ImpacTeen Research Paper Series, No. 11.

  42. Di Franza JR,Coleman M (2001) Sources of tobacco for youth in communities with strong enforcement of youth access laws. Tob Control 10: 323-328.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Emery S,Gilpin EA,White MM,Pierce JP (1999) How adolescents get their cigarettes: implications for policies on access and price. J Natl Cancer Inst 91: 14-186.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Castrucci BC,Gerlach KK,Kaufman NJ,Orleans CT (2002) Adolescents' acquisition of cigarettes through noncommercial sources. J Adol Health 31: 322-326.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Altman DG,Wheelis AY,McFarlane M,Lee H,Fortmann SP (1999) The relationship between tobacco access and use among adolescents: a four community study. Soc Sci Med 48: 759-775.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Forster JL,Murray DM,Wolfson M,Blaine TM,Wagenaar AC,Hennrikus DJ (1998) The effects of community policies to reduce youth access to tobacco. Am J Pub Health 88: 1193-1198.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Staff M,March L,Brnabic A, et al. (1998) Can non-prosecutory enforcement of public health legislation reduce smoking among high school students. Aust N Z J Pub Health 22: 332-335.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilpin, E.A., Emery, S., White, M.M. et al. Changes in youth smoking participation in California in the 1990s. Cancer Causes Control 14, 985–993 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CACO.0000007971.36237.a5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CACO.0000007971.36237.a5

Navigation