Skip to main content

Financial Markets: A Tool for Social Responsibility?

Journal of Business Ethics volume 52, pages 59–71 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives of socially responsible investment (SRI) are discussed with reference to the two main mechanisms of the SRI ‘movement’: shareholder advocacy and managed investments. We argue that in their current forms, both mechanisms lack the power to create significant corporate change. Shareholder advocacy has been largely unsuccessful to date. Even if resolutions were successful, shareholder advocacy may still be ineffective if underlying economic opportunities remain. Marketing material and investment prospectuses issued by socially responsible mutual funds (SRI funds) commonly contain the claim that, by affecting corporations' access to capital funding, SRI funds can change corporate practices. This paper makes a contribution by presenting the market share of SRI funds in the regions where they are most developed, being Europe, the U.S. and Australia, to show that this claim is unlikely to eventuate. SRI funds also commonly claim that they will outperform conventional active mutual funds. That the economic performances of both are similar might be explained by their similar portfolio compositions. The paper makes an innovation in the SRI literature by adopting a legitimacy framework to explain the continued presence of SRI funds. To achieve desired social and environmental outcomes, SRI funds are urged to address issues at a more systemic level. A suggested mechanism is the collective lobbying of corporations and, especially, governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Abelson, P.: 2002, Lectures in Public Economics, 4th Edition (Applied Economics, Sydney, Australia), pp. 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, P. U. and M. Gold: 2002, An Appraisal of Socially Responsible Investments and Implications for Trustees and other Investment Fiduciaries (Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, The University of Melbourne, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • ASX [The Australian Stock Exchange]: 2003, (available at: http://www.asx.com.au), retrieved 14 September 2003.

  • Beal, D. and M. Goyen: 1998, ‘Putting your Money Where Your Mouth Is' A Profile of Ethical Investors’ Financial Services Review 7(2), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S.: 1986, Critique, Norm and Utopia A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruyn, S. T.: 1987, The Field of Social Investment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • CalPERS: 2003, ‘Shareowner Action’ (available at: http://www.calpers-governance.org/alert), retrieved 21 August 2003.

  • Calvert: 2003a, ‘Resolution Filing History’ (available at:http://www.calvert.com/sri_2766. html), retrieved 22 August 2003.

  • Calvert: 2003b, ‘Shareholder Resolution Process’ (available at:http://www.calvert.com/sri649.html), retrieved 22 August 2003.

  • Cooper, D. J. and M. J. Sherer: 1984, ‘Corporate Accounting Reports: Arguments for a Political Economy of Accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 9(3/4), 207–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullis, J. G., A. Lewis and A. Winnett: 1992, ‘Paying To Be Good? UK Ethical Investments’, Kyklos 45, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, L. S.: 2000, ‘The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Trusts: An Australian Perspective’, Journal of Business Ethics 25(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber, S. J. Brown and W. N. Goetzmann: 2003, Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NJ), pp. 364–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethical Investor: 2003, Corporate Monitor Tables 20, 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federation Europeenne des Fonds et Societes D'investissement (FEFSI): 2003, ‘The European Investment Funds Industry’ (available at: http://www.fefsi.org), retrieved 18 August 2003.

  • Freeman, R. E. and D. R. Jr. Gilbert: 1992, ‘Business, Ethics and Society: A Critical Agenda’, Business and Society Spring, 9–17.

  • Friends Provident: 2003, ‘Responsible Engagement Overlay’ (available at: http://www.friendsprovident.co.uk), retrieved 22 August 2003.

  • Gold, M. and P. U. Ali: 2002, ‘Analysing the Cost of Ethical Investment’, JASSA 3, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., D. Owen and K. Maunders: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Reporting: Emerging Trends in the Accountability and the Social Contract’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1(1), 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1990, The Theory of Communicative Action (Polity Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harte, G., L. Lewis and D. L. Owen: 1991, ‘Ethical Investment and the Corporate Reporting Function’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2(3), 227–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Investment Company Institute: 2003, ‘Mutual Funds Facts and Figures Historical “Trends” Data’ (available at: http://www.ici.org/facts_figures/historical_trends.html), retrieved 31 January 2003.

  • Investor Responsibility Research Center and the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility [IRRC and ICCR]: 2003, ‘2003 Shareholder Proxy Season Overview: Social and Corporate Governance Resolution Trends’ (available at: http://www.hastingsgroup.com/021203proxy_season_overview_FINAL.PDF), retrieved 16 February 2003.

  • Johnsen, D. B.: 2003, ‘Socially Responsible Investing: A Critical Appraisal’, 43(3) Part 3, 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. T.: 1996, ‘Social Responsibility and the “Green” Business Firm’, Industrial and Environmental Crisis Quarterly 9(3), 327–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinder, P. D., S. D. Lydenberg and A. L. Domini: 1993, Investing for Good: Making Money While Being Socially Responsible (HarperCollins, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreander, N.: 2001, 'An Analysis of European Ethical Funds', Occasional Research Paper No. 33 (Certified Accountants Educational Trust, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R., W. B. Lamb and R. E. Wokutch: 2002, ‘The End of the South African Sanctions, Institutional Ownership, and the Stock Price Performance of Boycotted Firms’, Business and Society 41(2), 133–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, L.: 2002, ‘Studies in the Field of Socially Responsible Investing’ (available at: http://www.sristudies.org/essay_frameset.html), retrieved 18 October 2002.

  • Langtry, B.: 2002, ‘The Ethics of Shareholding’, Journal of Business Ethics 37(2), 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A.: 2001, ‘A Focus Group Study of the Motivation to Invest: “Ethical/Green” and “Ordinary” Investors Compared’, Journal of Socio-Economics 30(4), 331–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. and C. Mackenzie: 2000, ‘Support for Investor Activism Among UK Ethical Investors’, Journal of Business Ethics 24(3), 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A., P. Webley, A. Winnett and C. Mackenzie: 1998, ‘Morals and Markets: Some Theoretical and Policy Implications of Ethical Investment’, in P. Taylor-Gooby (ed.), Choice and Public Policy (Macmillan, London), pp. 164–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C.: 1997, ‘Ethical Investment and the Challenge of Corporate Reform’, Unpublished doctoral thesis (University of Bath, England).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C. and A. Lewis: 1999, ‘Morals and Markets: The Case of Ethical Investing’, Business Ethics Quarterly 9(3), 439–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, D. L.: 1990, ‘Towards a Theory of Social Investment: A Review Essay’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 15(3), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainmaker Information: 2003a, ‘Roundup Express December Quarter 2002’ (Rainmaker Information Pty. Ltd., Sydney, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainmaker Information: 2003b, ‘Roundup Express March Quarter 2003’ (Rainmaker Information Pty. Ltd., Sydney, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockness, J. and P. F. Williams: 1998, ‘A Descriptive Study of Social Responsibility Mutual Funds’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 13(4), 397–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L. V. and A. K. Buchholtz: 2001, ‘Trust, Risk and Shareholder Decision Making: An Investor Perspective on Corporate Governance’, Business Ethics Quarterly 11(1), 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. C.: 1990, Morality and the Market Consumer Pressure for Corporate Accountability (Routledge, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • SocialFunds.com: 2003, ‘The Answer to the Coffee Crisis? Farmers Want Fair Price, Kraft Says Increase Demand’ (available at: http://www.socialfunds.com/news/article.cgi/1102.html), retrieved 22 August 2003.

  • SRI World Group: 2003, ‘World Economic Forum Surveys CEO Attitudes Toward Corporate Citizenship’ (available at: http://www.socialfunds.com/news/article.cgi/article1028.html), retrieved 16 February 2003.

  • Statman, M.: 2000, ‘Socially Responsible Mutual Funds’, Financial Analysts Journal 56(3), 30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sustainable Investment Research International Group [SiRi Group]: 2002, ‘Green, Social and Ethical Funds in Europe 2001’, Sustainable Investment Research International Group (available at: http://www.sirigroup.org), retrieved 3 March 2002.

  • Teoh, S. W., I. Welch and C. P. Wazzan: 1999, ‘The Eect of Socially Activist Investment Policies on the Financial Markets: Evidence from the South African Boycott’, Journal of Business 72(1), 25–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whincop, M. J.: 2003, ‘The Role of the Shareholder in Corporate Governance: A Theoretical Approach’ (available at: http://www.austlii.edu.au), retrieved: 16 February 2003.

  • Williamson, O. E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia

    Matthew Haigh

  2. Department of Accounting and finance, Macquarie University, 2109, NSW, Australia

    James Hazelton

Authors
  1. Matthew Haigh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Hazelton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haigh, M., Hazelton, J. Financial Markets: A Tool for Social Responsibility?. Journal of Business Ethics 52, 59–71 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033107.22587.0b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033107.22587.0b

  • socially responsible investment
  • ethical investment
  • shareholder activism
  • mutual funds
  • managed funds
  • legitimacy