Abstract
Jones's (1991) issue-contingent model of ethical decision making posits that six dimensions of moral intensity influence decision makers' recognition of an issue as a moral problem and subsequent behavior. He notes that "organizational settings present special challenges to moral agents" (1991, p. 390) and that organizational factors affect "moral decision making and behavior at two points: establishing moral intent and engaging in moral behavior" (1991, p. 391). This model, however, minimizes both the impact of organizational setting and organizational factors on these experiences of ethical issues. In this theory, context is modeled as affecting the moral intent and behavior of the actor rather than directly affecting the issue's moral intensity. Here we look specifically at the effect of context on the moral intensity of ethical issues through a phenomenological study. Our results indicate that in certain environments, context may be critical in affecting the moral intensity of ethical issues. Thus, researchers should consider it more fully when assessing these issues' moral intensity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacharach, S. B.: 1989, 'Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation', Academy of Management Review 14(4), 496-515.
Barnard, C.: 1938, The Functions of the Executive (Harvard University Press, Cambridge).
Beach, L. R.: 1997, The Psychology of Decision Making: People in Organizations (Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA).
Bommer, M., C. Gratto, J. Gravander and M. Tuttle: 1987, 'A Behavioral Model of Unethical Decision-Making', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 265-280.
Creswell, J.: 1998, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among the Five Traditions (Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA).
Dutton, J. and S. Jackson: 1987, 'Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action', Academy of Management Review 12(1), 76-90.
Elm, D. R. and M. L. Nichols: 1993, 'An Investigation of Managers' Moral Reasoning', Journal of Business Ethics 12, 167-187
Elm, D. R., E. J. Kennedy and L. Lawton: 2001, 'Determinants of Moral Reasoning: Sex Role Orientation, Gender, and Academic Factors', Business & Society 40(3), 241-265.
Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985, 'A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing', Journal of Marketing 49(3), 87-96.
Fiske, S. T. and S. E. Taylor: 1984, Social Cognition (Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, MA).
Frey, B. F.: 2000, 'Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers', Journal of Business Ethics 32, 423-431.
Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss: 1976, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (Aldine, Hawthorne, NY).
Glick, W. H.: 1988, 'Comment: Organizations do not Cognize; Response: Organizations are not Central Tendencies: Shadowboxing in the Dark, Round 2', Academy of Management Review 13(1), 129-137.
Hunt, S. D. and S. J. Vitell: 1986, 'A General Theory of Marketing Ethics', Journal of Macromarketing 8, 5-16.
Jones, T.: 1991, 'Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model', Academy of Management Review 16(2), 366-395.
Kahneman, D., P. Slovic and A. Tversky: 1982, Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY).
Kohlberg, L.: 1976, 'Moral Stages and Moralization', in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues (Holt, Rhinehart, & Winston, New York).
Kram, K., P. Yeager and G. Reed: 1989, 'Decisions and Dilemmas: The Ethical Dimension in the Corporate Culture', in Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 11 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).
Liedtka, J.: 1991, 'Organizational Value Contention and Managerial Mindsets', Journal of Business Ethics 10(7), 543-557.
Marshall, B. and P. Dewe: 1997, 'An Investigation of the Components of Moral Intensity', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 521-530.
May, D. R. and K. P. Pauli: 2002, 'The Role of Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision Making: Review and Investigation of Moral Recognition Evaluation and Intention', Business and Society 4(1), 84-117.
Messick, D. M. and M. H. Bazerman: 1996, 'Ethical Leadership and the Psychology of Decision making', Sloan Management Review 37(2), 9-22.
Schein, E. H.: 1984, 'Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture', Sloan Management Review 25(2), 3-16.
Schneider, B.: 1983, 'Work Climates: An Interactionist Perspective', in N. W. Feimer and E. S. Geiler (eds.), Environmental Psychology: Directions and Perspectives (Praeger, New York, NY).
Sims, R. L. and T. L. Keon: 1999, 'Determinants of Ethical Decision Making: The Relationship of the Perceived Organizational Environment', Journal of Business Ethics 19(4), 393-401.
Sims, R. L. and T. L. Keon: 2000, 'The Influence of Organizational Expectations on Ethical Decision Making Conflict', Journal of Business Ethics 23(2), 219-228.
Singhapakdi, A., S. J. Vitell and K. L. Kraft: 1996, 'Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making of Marketing Professionals', Journal of Business Research 36, 245-255.
Taylor, S. T. and R. Bogdan: 1998, Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York).
Trevino, L. K.: 1986, 'Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model', Academy of Management Review 11(3), 601-617.
Van Mannen and Schein: 1979, 'Toward a Theory of Organizational Socialization', Research in Organizational Behavior 1, 209-264.
Victor, B. & Cullen, J. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33 (1), 101-125.
Vitell, S. J. and S. D. Hunt: 1990, 'The General Theory of Marketing Ethics: A Partial Test of the Model', in J. D. Seth (ed.), Research in Marketing, Vol. 10 (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT).
Webb, E. J., D. T. Campbell, R. D. Schwartz, L. Sechrest and J. Below: 1981, Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA).
Weber, J. and J. Gillespie: 1998, Ethical Initiatives in Southwestern Pennsylvania: A Benchmark Report from the Beard Center for Leadership in Ethics (Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA).
Weber, J. and D. Wasieleski: 2001, 'Investigating Influences on Managers' Moral Reasoning: The Impact of Context and Personal and Organizational Factors', Business & Society 40(1), 79-111.
Weber, J.: 1996, 'Influences upon Managerial Moral Decision Making: Nature of the Harm and Magnitude of Consequences', Human Relations 49, 1-22.
Whetten, D. A.: 1998, 'What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?', Academy of Management Review 14(4), 490-495.
Wimbush, J. C.: 1999, 'The Effect of Cognitive Moral Development and Supervisory Influence on Subordinates Ethical Behavior', Journal of Business Ethics 18(4), 383-395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelley, P.C., Elm, D.R. The Effect of Context on Moral Intensity of Ethical Issues: Revising Jones's Issue-Contingent Model. Journal of Business Ethics 48, 139–154 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004594.61954.73
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000004594.61954.73