BT Technology Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 71–82 | Cite as

Public Displays of Connection

  • J Donath
  • D Boyd

Abstract

Participants in social network sites create self-descriptive profiles that include their links to other members, creating a visible network of connections — the ostensible purpose of these sites is to use this network to make friends, dates, and business connections. In this paper we explore the social implications of the public display of one's social network. Why do people display their social connections in everyday life, and why do they do so in these networking sites? What do people learn about another's identity through the signal of network display? How does this display facilitate connections, and how does it change the costs and benefits of making and brokering such connections compared to traditional means? The paper includes several design recommendations for future networking sites.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Orkut — http://www.orkut.com/Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    LinkedIn — http://www.linkedin.com/Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spoke — http://www.spoke.com/Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friendstar — http:/www.friendster.com/Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wellman B and Potter S: 'The elements of personal community', in Wellman B (Ed): 'Networks in the Global Village', Boulder, CO, Westview Press (1999).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wellman B and Gulia M: 'The network basis of social support: A network is more than the sum of its ties', in Wellman B (Ed): 'Networks in the Global Village', Boulder, CO, Westview Press (1999).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tribe.net — http://www.tribe.net/Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ryze — http:/www.ryze.com/Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    boyd d: 'Friendster and publicly articulated social networks', Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI 2004), Vienna, ACM (April 2004).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feld S L: 'The focused organisation of social ties', American Journal of Sociology, 86, No 5, pp 1015—1035 (March 1981).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bloch F, Rao V and Desai S: 'Wedding celebrations as conspicuous consumption: signaling social status in rural India', Journal of Human Resources (forthcoming 2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Csikszentmihályi M and Rochberg H: 'The meaning of things', Cambridge, University of Cambridge Press (1981).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burt R: 'The social capital of structural holes', in Mauro F and Guillén R C, England P and Meyer M (Eds): 'New directions in economic sociology', Russell Sage Foundation (2002).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim H: 'Social capital, embedded status, and the endorsement effect', Paper prepared for the SSRC workshop on the Corporation as a Social Institution, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley (2001).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Halle D: 'Inside culture: art and class in American homes', Chicago, University of Chicago Press (1993).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dawkins M S and Guilford T: 'The corruption of honest signalling', Animal Behaviour, 41, pp 865—873 (1991).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grafen A: 'Biological signals as handicaps', Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144, pp 517—546 (1990).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zahavi A: 'The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle)', Journal of Theoretical Biology, 67, pp 603—605 (1977).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Veblen T: 'The theory of the leisure class', NewYork, Macmillan (1899).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spence M: 'Job market signaling', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 8, pp 355—374 (1973).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Donath J: 'Identity and deception in the virtual community', in Kollock P and Smith M (Eds): 'Communities in Cyberspace', Routledge, London (1998).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Friedman E J and Resnick P: 'The social cost of cheap pseudonyms', Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 10, No 2, pp 173—199 (2001).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mulrine A: 'Love.com: for better or for worse, the Internet is radically changing the dating scene in America', USA News & World Report (September 2003).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    boyd d: 'Faceted Id/entity: managing representation in a digital world', MIT Master's Thesis, Cambridge, MA (August 2002).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Granovetter M S: 'The strength of weak ties', American Journal of Sociology, 78, pp 1360—1380 (1973).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guare J: 'Six Degrees of Separation', 2nd Ed, New York, Vintage Books (1994).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    David Hampton Article (July 2003) — http://news.telegraph.co.ukGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goffman E: 'The presentation of self in everyday life', New York, Doubleday Anchor (1959).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Granovetter M S: 'The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited', Sociological Theory, 1, pp 201—233 (1983).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lin N: 'Social networks and status attainment', Annual Review of Sociology, 25, pp 467—487 (1999) — http://www.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fischer C: 'America calling', Berkeley, University of California (1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J Donath
  • D Boyd

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations