Skip to main content
Log in

Does Subjective Burden of Early Breast Cancer and its Treatment Affect Immune Measures During Adjuvant Therapy?

  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Psychosocial factors have been described as affecting cellular immune measures in healthy subjects. In patients with early breast cancer we explored bi-directional psycho-immune effects to determine whether subjective burden has an impact on immune measures, and vice versa.

Patients (n= 239) operated for early breast cancer and randomized into International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) adjuvant clinical trials were assessed immediately before the beginning of adjuvant treatment (baseline) and 3 and 6 months thereafter, at the beginning of the corresponding treatment cycle. Cellular immune measures (leukocytes, lymphocytes, lymphocyte subset counts), markers of activation of the cellular immune system (β 2-microglobulin, soluble interleukin–2 receptor serum levels), and self-report subjective burden (global indicators of physical well-being, mood, coping effort) were assessed concurrently. The relationship between subjective burden and gradients of immune measures was investigated with regression analyses controlling for adjuvant treatment. There was a pattern of small negative associations between all variables assessing subjective burden before the beginning of adjuvant therapy with the gradients of the markers of activation of the cellular immune system and NK cell counts. In particular, better mood predicted a decline in the course of β 2-microglobulin and IL-2r at months 3 and 6. The gradient of β 2-microglobulin was associated with mood and coping effort at month 3. However, the effect sizes were very small. In conclusion, in this explorative investigation, there was an indication for subjective burden affecting and being affected by markers of activation of the cellular immune system during the first 3 and 6months of adjuvant therapy. The question of clinical significance remains unanswered. These associations have to be investigated with refined assessment tools and schedules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herbert TB, Cohen S: Stress and Immunity in Humans: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychosom Med 55: 364–379, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garssen B, Goodkin K: On the role of immunological factors as mediators between psychosocial factors and cancer progression. Psych Res 85: 51–61, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen S, Rabin BS: Psychologic stress, immunity, and cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 90: 3–4, 1998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mitchel RJ: The delayed hypersensitivity response in primary breast carcinoma as an index of host resistance. Br J Surg 59: 505–508, 1972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts MM, Jones Williams W: The delayed hypersensi-tivity reaction in breast cancer. Br J Surg 61: 522–549, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nemoto T, Han T, Minowada J, Angkur V, Chamberlain A, Dao TL: Cell-mediated immune status of breast cancer patients: Evaluation by skin tests, lymphocyte stimulation, and counts of rosette-forming cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 53: 641–671, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Catalona WJ, Sample WF, Chretien PB: Lymphocyte reactivity in cancer patients: Correlation with tumor histology and clinical stage. Cancer 31: 65–71, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Head JF, Elliot RL, McCoy JL: Evaluation of lymphocyte immunity in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 26: 77–88, 1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sabbioni MEE, Siegrist HP, Bacchi M, et al: Association between immunity and prognostic factors in early stage breast cancer patients before adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 59: 279–287, 2000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garner WL, Minton JP, James AG, Hoffmann CC: Human breast cancer and impaired NK cell function. J Surg Oncol 24: 64–66, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiecolt JK, Glaser R. Psychoneuroimmunology and can-cer: fact or ction? Eur J Cancer 35: 1603–1607, 1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hürny C, Bernhard J, Coates AS, et al: Impact of adjuvant therapy on QOL in women with node-positive breast cancer. Lancet 347: 1279–1284, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Pompe G, Antoni M, Visser A, Garssen B: Adjustment to breast cancer: The psychobiological effects of psychosocial interventions. Pat Educ and Couns 28: 209–219, 1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lekander M, Fürst CJ, Rotstein S, Blomgren H, Fredrik-son M: Social support and immune status during and after chemotherapy for breast cancer. Acta Oncol 35: 31–37, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tjemsland L, Soreide JA, Matre R, Malt UF: Preoperative psychological variables predict immunologic status in patients with operable breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol;6: 311–320, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Andersen BL, Farrar WB, Golden-Kreutz D, et al: Stress and immune responses after surgical treatment for regional breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 67: 30–36, 1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Levy SM, Herberman RB, Maluish AM, Schlien G, Lippman M: Prognostic risk assessment in primary breast cancer by behavioral and immunological parameters. Health Psychol 4: 99–113, 1985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Levy S, Herberman R, Lippman M, d 'Angelo T: Correla-tion of stress factors with sustained depression of natural killer cell activity and predicted prognosis in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 5: 348–353, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marsland AL, Manuck SB, Fazzari TV, Stewart CJ, Rabin BS: Stability of individual differences in cellular immune responses to acute psychological stress. Psychosom Med 57: 295–298, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. International Breast Cancer Study Group: Duration and reintroduction of adjuvant chemotherapy for nodes-posi-tive premenopausal breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 14: 1885–1894, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  21. International Breast Camcer Study Group: Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with tamoxifen for node-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 15: 1385–1394, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bernhard J, Sullivan M, Hürny C, Coates AS, Rudenstam CM: Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials. Br J Cancer 84(9): 1156–1165, 2001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Butow P, Coates A, Dunn S, Bernhard J, Hürny C: On the receiving end IV: Validation of quality of life indicators. Ann Oncol 2: 597–603, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coates A, Glasziou P, McNeil D: Measurement of quality of life during cancer chemotherapy. Annals Oncol 1: 213–217, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hürny C, Bernhard J, Gelber RD, et al: Quality of life measures for patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: an International Trial. Eur J Cancer 28: 118–124, 1992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Coates A, Gebski V, Bishop JF, et al: Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 317: 1490–1495, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernhard J, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Schmitz S-FH, et al: Quality of life in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer after failure of tamoxifen: formestane versus meges-trol acetate as second-line hormonal treatment. Eur J Cancer 35: 913–920, 1999

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernhard J, Thürlimann B, Schmitz S-FH, et al: Defining clinical bene t in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer under second-line endocrine treatment: does quality of life matter? J Clin Oncol 17: 1672–1679, 1999

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Coates AS, Hürny C, Peterson HF, et al: Quality-of-life scores predict outcome in metastatic but not early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16: 3768–3774, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  30. Coates AS, Gebski V, Signorini D, et al: Prognostic value of quality-of-life scores during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.Australian New Zealand Breast Cancer Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 10: 1833–1838, 1992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Coates AS, Thomson D, McLeod GR, et al: Prognostic value of quality of life scores in a trial of chemotherapy with or without interferon in patients with metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer 29A: 1731–1734, 1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Herschbach P, Marten-Mittag B, Henrich G: Revision und Prüfung des Fragebogens zur Belastung von Krebskranken (FBK-R23). Zeitschft Med Psychol 12: 69–76, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gerits P, De Brabander B: Psychosocial predictors of psychological, neurochemical, and immunological symp-toms of acute stress among breast cancer patients. Psych Res 85: 95–103, 1999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gruber BL, Hersh SP, Hall NRS, et al: Immunological responses of breast cancer patients to behavioral interven-tions. Biofeedback Self-Regul 18: 1–22, 1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Levy MS, Herberman RB, Lippman M, D 'Angelo T, Lee J: Immunological and psychosocial predictors of disease recurrence in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Behav Med 17: 67–75, 1991

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R: Psychoneuroimmunology and health consequences: data and shared mechanisms. Psycho-som Med 57: 269–274, 1995

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabbioni, M.E., Bernhard, J., Siegrist, HP. et al. Does Subjective Burden of Early Breast Cancer and its Treatment Affect Immune Measures During Adjuvant Therapy?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 87, 75–86 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BREA.0000041584.53863.a7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BREA.0000041584.53863.a7

Navigation