Biological Invasions

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 323–335

From Desirable Ornamental Plant to Pest to Accepted Addition to the Flora? – the Perception of an Alien Tree Species Through the Centuries

  • Uwe Starfinger
  • Ingo Kowarik
  • Michael Rode
  • Hartwig Schepker
Article

Abstract

Prunus serotina, a forest tree of North American origin, was introduced to central Europe and planted for various purposes. In the course of the centuries it was regarded as a valuable timber tree by European foresters; subsequently, as a useful non-timber species in forestry, a forest pest, a controllable weed and, eventually, as a species we have to live with. All these perceived qualities served as motives for action by humans without seeking scientific evidence for them: millions of specimens of P. serotina were planted, later millions of euros were spent in attempts at control. The species, and its changing perception through time, may be an example of the need for science-based assessments as a basis for developing policies concerning non-native plants.

central Europe control exotic pest plant forestry impact nature conservation perception plant invasion Prunus serotina use of alien plants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aulair AN (1975) Sprouting response in Prunus serotina: multivariate analysis of site forest structure and growth relationships. American Midland Naturalist 94: 72–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auclair AN and Cottam G (1971) Dynamics of black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) in southern Wisconsin oak forests. Ecological Monographs 41: 153–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker J (1963) De ontwikkelingsgeschiedenis van Prunus serotina Ehrh. in Nederland. Nederlands BosbouwTijdschrift 35: 201–206Google Scholar
  4. Booth J (1896) Die nordamerikanischen Holzarten und ihre Gegner. Zeitschrift für Forst-und Jagdwesen: 18Google Scholar
  5. Borrmann K (1987) Einbürgerung, Ausbreitung und Vorkommen der Späten Traubenkirsche (Padus serotina Borkh.) in der Oberförsterei Lütkenhagen (Kreis Neustrelitz). Botanischer Rundbriefür den Bezirk Neubrandenburg 19: 13–18Google Scholar
  6. Edwards K (1998) A critique of the general approach to invasive plant species. In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I and Williamson M (eds) Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses, pp 85–94. Backhuys, Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  7. Eijsackers H (1974) Mogelijke neveneffekten van bestrijdingsmiddelen tegen Prunus serotina. Nederlands Bosbouw Tijdschrift 46: 55–62Google Scholar
  8. Eijsackers H and Oldenkamp L (1976) Amerikaanse vogelkers, aanvaarding of beperking? Landbouwkundig Tijdschrift 12: 366–374Google Scholar
  9. Endtmann KJ (1993) Fremdländische Gehölze in Wäldern und Forsten Brandenburgs. Beiträge zur Gehözkunde 1993: 84–93Google Scholar
  10. Ernst K (1965) Späte Traubenkirsche und Traubenholunder. Berliner Naturschutzblätter 26: 4–11Google Scholar
  11. Eser U (1998) Assessment of plant invasions: theoretical and philosophical fundamentals. In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I and Williamson M (eds) Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses, pp 95–107. Backhuys, Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  12. Facelli M and Pickett STA (1991) Plant litter: its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. The Botanical Review 57: 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goeze (1916) Liste der seit dem 16. Jahrhundert bis auf die Gegenwart in die Gärten und Parks Europas eingeführten Bäume und Sträucher. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft 25: 129–201Google Scholar
  14. Haag C and Wilhelm U (1998) Arbeiten mit 'unerwünschter' Baumart oder Verschleppung einer Katastrophe? AFZ: 276–279Google Scholar
  15. Jager K (1977) Glyfosaat, een nieuw middel voor de bestrijding van Amerikaanse vogelkers (Prunus serotina). Nederlands Bosbouw Tijdschrift 49: 191–198Google Scholar
  16. Jager K and ten Kate S (1975) Nieuwe middelen voor de bestrijding van Amerikaanse vogelkers. Gewasbescherming 2: 25–31Google Scholar
  17. Jager K and Oosterbaan A (1979) Bestrijding van Amerikaanse vogelkers (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) door middel van stamof stobbebehandelingen. Nederlands Bosbouw Tijdschrift 51: 113–120Google Scholar
  18. Kowarik I (1995) Ausbreitung nichteinheimischer Gehölzarten als Problem des Naturschutzes? In: Böcker R, Gebhardt H, Konold W and Schmidt-Fischer S (eds) Gebietsfremde Pflanzenarten, pp 33–56. Ecomed, Landsberg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  19. Kowarik I (1999) Neophytes in Germany. Quantitative overview, introduction and dispersal pathways, ecological consequences, and open questions. Federal Environmental Agency Berlin, Texte 18/99: 12–36Google Scholar
  20. Kowarik I (2003) Human agency in biological invasions: secondary releases foster naturalisation and population expansion of alien plant species. Biological Invasions 5: 293–312 (this issue)Google Scholar
  21. Kowarik I and Schepker H (1998) Plant invasions in Northern Germany: human perception and response. In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I and Williamson M (eds) Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses, pp 109–120. Backhuys, Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  22. Leuschner C and Rode MW (1999) The role of plant resources in forest succession: changes in radiation, water and nutrient fluxes, and plant productivity over 300-yr-long chronosequence in NW-Germany. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2: 103–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lodge DM (1993) Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. TREE 8: 133–137Google Scholar
  24. Marquis DA (1983) Regeneration of black cherry in the Alleghenies. 11th annual hardwood symposium, pp 106–119. Hardwood Research Council, Cashiers, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  25. McDonnell MJ and Stiles EW (1983) The structural complexity of old field vegetation and the recruitment of bird-dispersed plant species. Oecologia 56: 109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mooyweer AM (1978) De MORO Prunusrooier. Nederlands Bosbouw Tijdschrift 50: 300Google Scholar
  27. Olsthoorn A and van Hees A (2001) 40 years of black cherry (Prunus serotina) control in the Netherlands: lessons for management of invasive tree species. In: Starfinger U and Kowarik I (eds) Biological Invasions - a Challenge to Act? Contributions and results of a conference in Berlin, 4-7 October 2000, pp 43–44. Federal Nature Conservation Agency, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Holle BV, Moyle PB, Byers JE and Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological Invasions 1: 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rode M, Kowarik I, Müller T and Wendebourg T (2001) The Effects of Black Cherry (Prunus serotina) on Pine Forest Ecosystems in Niedersachsen (Northern Germany). In: Starfinger U and Kowarik I (eds) Biological Invasions - a Challenge to Act? Contributions and results of a conference in Berlin, 4-7 October2000, pp 91–92. Federal Nature Conservation Agency, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  30. Rode M, Kowarik I, Müller T and Wendebourg T (2002) Ökosystemare Auswirkungen von Prunus serotina auf norddeutsche Kiefernforsten. Neobiota 1: 135–148Google Scholar
  31. Sachse U, Starfinger U and Kowarik I (1990) Synanthropic woody species in the urban area of Berlin (West). In: Sukopp H, Hejny S and Kowarik I (eds) Urban Ecology, pp 233–243. SPB Academic Publishing, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  32. Schachtschabel P, Blume H-P, Hartge KH and Schwertmann U (1984) Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheepens PC and van Zon HCJ (1982) Microbial herbicides. In: Kurstak E (ed) Microbial and Viral Herbicides, pp 623–641. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Schepker H (1998) Wahrnehmung, Ausbreitung und Bewertung von Neophyten - eine Analyse der problematischen nichteinheimischen Pflanzen in Niedersachsen. ibidem, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  35. Schwappach (1907) Ñber die wichtigsten für deutsche Forsten geeigneten Laubholzarten. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft 16: 126Google Scholar
  36. Seeger JM (1994). Forstliche Verhältnisse im Gebiet der Landwirtschaftskammer Weser-Ems. Landwirtschaftskammer Weser-Ems, Oldenburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  37. Seidling W (1993) Zum Vorkommen von Calamagrostis epigejos und Prunus serotina in den Berliner Forsten. Verhandlungen des Botanischen Vereins von Berlin und Brandenburg 126: 113–148Google Scholar
  38. Silvertown J (1982) Introduction to Plant Population Ecology. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith AJ (1975) Invasion and ecesis of bird-disseminated woody plants in a temperate forest sere. Ecology 56: 19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spaeth I, Balder H and Kilz E (1994) Das Problem mit der Spätblühenden Traubenkirsche in den Berliner Forsten. Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung 11: 234–236Google Scholar
  41. Starfinger U (1990) Die Einbürgerung der Spätblühenden Traubenkirsche (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) in Mitteleuropa. Landschaftsentwicklung und Umweltforschung 69: 1–119Google Scholar
  42. Starfinger U (1997) Introduction and naturalization of Prunus serotina in central Europe. In: Brock JH, Wade M, Pysek P and Green D (eds) Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe, pp 161–171. Backhuys, Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  43. Starfinger U (1998) On success in plant invasions. In: Starfinger U, Edwards K, Kowarik I and Williamson M (eds) Plant Invasions: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses, pp 33–42. Backhuys, Leiden, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  44. Turcek FJ (1961) Ökologische Beziehungen der Vögel und Gehölze. Verlag der Slowakischen Akademie derWissenschaften, BratislavaGoogle Scholar
  45. Ulrich B (1988) Ökochemische Kennwerte des Bodens. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 151: 171–176Google Scholar
  46. van den Meersschaut D and Lust N (1997) Comparison of mechanical, biological and chemical methods for controlling black cherry (Prunus serotina) in Flanders (Belgium). Silva Gandavensis 62: 90–109Google Scholar
  47. van den Tweel PA and Eijsackers H (1987) Black cherry, a pioneer species or 'forest pest'. Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Serie C 90: 59–66Google Scholar
  48. von Schwerin F (1906) Prunus serotina Ehrhardt. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft 15: 1–3Google Scholar
  49. von Wendorff G (1952) Die Prunus serotina in Mitteleuropa. Eine waldbauliche Monographie. PhD Dissertation. Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  50. Wagner S (1996) Voranbau von Buche und Douglasie unter Spätblühender Traubenkirsche (Prunus serotina) im Forstamt Lingen, Revier Elbergen. Niedersächsische Forstlliche Versuchsanstalt, Göttingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  51. Wein K (1930) Die erste Einführung nordamerikanischer Gehölze in Europa. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft 42: 137–163Google Scholar
  52. Wendel GW (1977) Longevity of black cherry, wild grape and sassafras seed in the forest floor, Rep. No. NE-375. USDA Forest Service, Upper Darby, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  53. Westhoff V (1979) Bedrohung und Erhaltung seltener Pflanzengesellschaften in den Niederlanden. Berichte des Internationalen Symposiums der Internationalen Vereinigung für Vegetationskunde: 285–313Google Scholar
  54. Williamson M (1999) Invasions. Ecography 22: 5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wittig R (1979) Verbreitung, Vergesellschaftung und Status der Spätblühenden Traubenkirsche (Prunus serotina Ehrh., Rosaceae) in der Westfälischen Bucht. Natur und Heimat 39: 48–52Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uwe Starfinger
    • 1
  • Ingo Kowarik
    • 1
  • Michael Rode
    • 2
  • Hartwig Schepker
    • 3
  1. 1.TU Berlin, Institut für ÖkologieBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Universität Hannover, Institut für Landschaftspflege und NaturschutzHannoverGermany
  3. 3.Rampenstr. 16HannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations