Skip to main content
Log in

Microbial monitoring by molecular tools of a two-phase anaerobic bioreactor treating fruit and vegetable wastes

  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbial consortia in a two-phase, anaerobic bioreactor using a mixture of fruit and vegetable wastes were established. Bacterial and archaeal communities obtained by a culture-independent approach based on single strand conformation polymorphism analysis of total 16S rDNA showed the adaptation of the microflora to the process parameters. Throughout the 90 d of the study, the species composition of the bacterial community changed significantly. Bacterial 16S rDNA showed at least 7 different major species with a very prominent one corresponding to a Megasphaera elsdenii whereas bacterial 16S rDNA of a methanization bioreactor showed 10 different major species. After two weeks, Prevotella ruminicola became major and its dominance increased continuously until day 50. After an acid shock at pH 5, the 16S rDNA archaeal patterns in the acidogenic reactor showed two major prominent species corresponding to Methanosphaera stadtmanii and Methanobrevibacter wolinii, a hydrogenotrophic bacterium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer DB, Kirsop BH (1990) The microbiology and control of anaerobic digestion. In: Wheatley A, ed. Anaerobic Digestion: A Waste Treatment Technology. London: Elsevier Science Publishing Ltd., pp. 43–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouallagui H, BenCheikh R, Marouani L, Hamdi M (2003) Mesophilic biogas production from fruit and vegetable waste in tubular digester. Bioresourc. Technol. 86: 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabert P, Sialve B, Delgenès JP, Moletta R, Godon JJ (2001) Characterisation of the microbial 16S rDNA diversity of an aerobic phosphorus removal ecosystem and monitoring of its transition to nitrate respiration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 55: 500–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Dague RR, Habben CE, Pidaparti SR (1992) Initial studies on the anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 26: 2429–2432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delbès C, Moletta R, Godon JJ (2001) Bacterial and archaeal 16S rDNA and 16S rRNA dynamics during an acetate crisis in an anaerobic digester ecosystem. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 35: 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong-Hun L, Young-Gun Z, Sang-Jong K (1996) Nonradioactive method to study genetic profiles of natural bacterial communities by PCR-Single-Strand-Conformation Polymorphism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62: 3112–3120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsden SR, Volcani BE, Gilchrist FC, Lewis D (1956) Properties of a fatty acid forming organism isolated from the rumen of sheep. J. Bacteriol. 72: 681–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez A, Huang S, Seston S, Xing J, Hickey R, Criddle C, Tiedje J (1999) How stable is stable? Function versus community composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 3697–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Calderon D, Buffière P, Moletta R, Elmaleh S (1998) Anaerobic digestion of wine distillery wastewater in down flow fluidized bed. Water Res. 31: 3593–3600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godon JJ, Zumstein E, Dabert P, Habouzit F, Moletta R (1997) Microbial 16S rDNA diversity in an anaerobic digester. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63: 2802–2813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg AE, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD (1992) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edn. New York: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Pollution Control Federation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster IW (1984) Liquefaction and acidogenesis of tomatoes in an anaerobic two-phase solid-waste treatment system. Agric.Wastes 11: 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclerc M, Delbès C, Moletta R, Godon JJ (2001) Single strand conformation polymorphism monitoring of 16S rDNA archaea during start-up of an anaerobic digester. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 34: 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavan P, Battistotini P, Cecchi F, Mata-Alvarez J (2000) Two-phase anaerobic digestion of source sorted OFMSW: performance and kinetic study. Water Sci. Technol. 41: 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumb JJ, Bell J, Stukey DC (2001) Microbial populations associated with treatment of an industrial dye effluent in an anaerobic baffled reactor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 3226–3235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeshwari KV, Panth DC, Lata K, Kishore VVN (2001) Novel process using enhanced acidification and a UASB reactor for biomethanation of vegetable market waste. Waste Manage. Res. 1: 292–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynal J, Delgenes JP, Moletta R (1998) Two-phase anaerobic digestion of solid wastes by a multiple liquefaction reactors process. Bioresour. Technol. 65: 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeken A, Kalyuzhnyi S, Scharff H, Hamelers B (2000) Effect of pH and VFA on hydrolysis of organic solid waste. J. Environ. Eng. 126: 1076–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verrier D, Ray F, Albagnac G (1987) Two-phase methanization of solid vegetable wastes. Biol. Wastes 22: 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland P (1993) One and two-step anaerobic digestion from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Water Sci. Technol. 27: 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumstein E, Moletta R Godon JJ (2000) Examination of two years of community dynamics in an anaerobic bioreactor using fluorescence polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Environ. Microbiol. 2: 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouallagui, H., Torrijos, M., Godon, J. et al. Microbial monitoring by molecular tools of a two-phase anaerobic bioreactor treating fruit and vegetable wastes. Biotechnology Letters 26, 857–862 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BILE.0000025892.19733.18

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BILE.0000025892.19733.18

Navigation