Skip to main content

Microcosm studies on control of aphids by generalist arthropod predators: Effects of alternative prey

BioControl volume 49, pages 483–504 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

Generalist predators are potential controlagents of aphids in cereal fields. Becauseaphids are low-quality prey for most generalistpredators, the availability of alternativehigh-quality prey may influence theinteractions between aphids and their predatorsby reducing the predation rate due to loweredpreference for aphids. We analysed this bytesting the ability of six generalist predators(the spiders Erigone atra (Bl.), Clubiona lutescens (Westr.)/reclusaO.P.-C., Pachygnatha degeeri Sundevall,Pardosa prativaga (L.Koch), the carabidbeetle Bembidion lampros (Herbst), andthe harvestman Oligolophus tridens (C.L.Koch)) to suppress Rhopalosiphum padi(Linné) populations in the presence orabsence of alternative prey types (fruit fliesDrosophila melanogaster (Meigen) or thecollembolan Tomocerus bidentatus(Folsom)). Experiments of 10 days duration werecarried out in a microcosm set-up. Withoutalternative prey all predators except B.lampros were able to reduce aphid populationdevelopment significantly relative topredator-free controls. The harvest spider O. tridens was the most efficient predator(<90% reduction). Presence of alternativeprey (fruit flies) had a significant negativeeffect on aphid limitation by P. prativagaand a weak positive effect in B. lampros, but did not influence the ability to reduce aphids in E. atra, Clubiona, P. degeeri and O. tridens. In addition, 24-hours' consumption experiments with adult P. degeeri and subadult C. lutescens/reclusa, using R. padi and D. melanogaster as prey types, showed markedly lower consumption rates of aphid than of fruit fly prey. The microcosm arrangement is a simple way to partly simulate the habitat complexity of an agricultural field under laboratory conditions and proved to be a useful tool for investigating complex predator-prey interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Alderweireldt, M., 1994a. Habitat manipulations increasing spider densities in agroecosystems: Possibilities for biological control? J. Appl. Entomol. 118: 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderweireldt, M., 1994b. Prey selection and prey capture strategies of linyphiid spiders in high-input agricultural fields. Bull. Brit. Arachnol. Soc. 9: 300–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alderweireldt, M. and R. De Keer, 1990. Field and laboratory observations on the life cycle Pachygnatha degeeriSundevall, 1830 and Pachygnatha clerckiSundevall, 1823 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Acta Zool. Fenn. 190: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.F., 1970. Metabolic rates of spiders. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 33: 51–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bachmann, E. and M. Schaefer, 1983. The opilionid fauna of a beech wood and dry grassland on limestone (Arachnida: Opilionida). Verh. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamburg 26: 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilde, T. and S. Toft, 1994. Prey preference and egg production of the carabid beetle Agonum dorsale. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 15: 51–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilde, T. and S. Toft, 1997. Consumption by carabid beetles of three cereal aphid species relative to other prey types. Entomophaga 42: 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilde, T. and S. Toft, 1999. Prey consumption and fecundity of the carabid beetle Calathus melanocephaluson diets of three cereal aphids: high consumption rates of low-quality prey. Pedobiologia 43: 422–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilde, T. and S. Toft, 2000. Evaluation of prey for the spider Dicymbium brevisetosumLocket (Araneae: Linyphiidae) in single-species and mixed-species diets. Ekològia (Bratislava) 19 (Suppl. 3):9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilde, T. and S. Toft, 2001. The value of three cereal aphid species as food for a generalist predator. Physiol. Entomol. 26: 58-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilde, T., J.A. Axelsen and S. Toft, 2000. The value of collembola from agricultural soils as food for a generalist predator. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 672–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg, C. and S. Toft, 2000. Importance of insect prey quality for grey partridge chicks (Perdix perdix): A self-selection experiment. J. Appl. Ecol. 37: 557–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, S. and A. Cady, 2001. Presence of harvestmen protect Brussels sprouts from insect pest damage. American Arachnology 64: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristowe, W.S., 1949. The distribution of harvestmen (Phalangida) in Great Britain and Ireland, with notes on their names, enemies and food. J. Anim. Ecol. 18: 100–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E.L., 1976. Optimal foraging: Attack strategy of a mantid. Amer. Nat. 110: 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. and D.H. Wise, 1999. Bottom-up limitations of predaceous arthropods in a detritusbased terrestrial food web. Ecology 80: 761–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiverton, P.A., 1986. Predator density manipulation and its effect on populations of Rhopalosiphum padiin spring barley. Ann. Appl. Biol.109: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiverton, P.A., 1987. Predation of Rhopalosiphum padi(Homoptera: Aphididae) by polyphagous predatory arthropods during the aphids' pre-peak period in spring barley. Ann. Appl. Biol. 111: 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiverton, P.A., 1988. Searching behaviour and cereal aphid consumption by Bembidion lamprosand Pterosticus cupreus, in relation to temperature and prey density. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47: 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Barro, P., 1992. The impact of spiders and high temperatures on cereal aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi) numbers in an irrigated perennial grass pasture in South Australia. Ann. Appl. Biol. 121: 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Keer, R. and J.-P. Maelfait, 1988. Laboratory observations of the development and reproduction of Erigone atraBlackwall, 1833 (Aranea, Linyphiidae). Bull. Brit. Arachnol. Soc. 7: 237–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinter, A., 1995. Estimation of epigeic spider population dynamics using a D-vac sampling technique and comparison with pitfall trap catches in winter wheat. In: S. Toft and W. Riedel (eds), Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land I. Density, spatial heterogeneity and dispersal. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus. pp. 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinter, A., 1998a. Interactions between spider and lacewing predators (Araneae: Erigonidae and Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and their affects on the grain aphid Sitobion avenaeFab. (Homoptera: Aphididae). Integrated control in cereal crops, IOBC bulletin 21(8): 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinter, A., 1998b. Intraguild predation between erigonid spiders, lacewing larvae and carabids. J. Appl. Entomol. 122: 163–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinter, A., 2002. Microcosm studies on intraguild predation between female erigonid spiders and lacewing larvae and influence of single versus multiple predators on cereal aphids. J. Appl. Entomol. 126: 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P.L. and R.G. Mckinlay, 1989. Aphid predation by harvestmen in potato fields in Scotland. J. Arachnol. 17: 253–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, C.A., K.D. Sunderland and K.S. George, 1979. Studies on polyphagous predators of cereal aphids. J. Appl. Ecol. 16: 811–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekbom, B.S. and S. Wiktelius, 1985. Polyphagous arthropod predators in cereal crops in central Sweden, 1979-1982. J. Appl. Entomol. 99: 433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M.J., 1978. Locomotory activity and the predation strategy of the wolf spider P. amentata(Clerck) (Lycosidae). Anim. Behav. 26: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halaj, J. and A.B. Cady, 2000. Diet composition and significance of earthworms as food of harvestmen. Amer. Midl. Nat. 143: 487–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hance, T., 1992. Spring densities of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in cultivated fields. Bull. Ann. Soc. R. Belge Entomol. 128: 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.M. and S.R. Thomas, 1997. Quantifying the impact of polyphagous invertebrate predators in controlling cereal aphids and in preventing wheat yield and quality reductions. Ann. Appl. Biol. 131: 375–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, H.B. and S. Toft, 1997a. Food preference, diet dependent fecundity and larval development in Harpalus rufipes(Copeoptera: Carabidae). Pedobiologia 41: 307–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, H.B. and S. Toft, 1997b. Role of the granivory and insectivory in the life cycle of the carabid beetle Amara similata. Ecol. Entomol. 22: 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J.A., G.M. Tatchell, M.J. Dupuch and R. Harrington, 1995. Movement of apterous Sitobion avanaein response to leaf disturbance caused by wind and rain. Ann. Appl. Biol. 126: 417–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, F. and U. Heimbach, 1993. Evaluation of lycosid, micryphantid and linyphiid spiders as predators of Rhopalosiphum padi(Hom. Aphididae) and their functional response to prey density-laboratory experiments. Entomophaga 38: 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcussen, B.M., J.A. Axelsen and S. Toft, 1999. The value of two Collembola species as food for a linyphiid spider. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 92: 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsrud, C. and S. Toft, 1999. The aggregative numerical response of polyphagous predators to aphids in cereal fields: Attraction to what? Ann. Appl. Biol. 134: 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, J., 1959. The seasonal occurrence, life histories and fecundity of harvest-spiders (Phalangida, Arachnida) in the neighbourhood of Durham city. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 95: 134–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, J., 1960. A contribution to the feeding biology of Mitopus morio(F) (Phalangida). J. Anim. Ecol. 29: 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M.J., 1996. Spiders of Britain and Northern Europe (3rd edition). HarperCollins Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samu, F., G. Vörös and E. Botos, 1996. Diversity and community of spiders of alfalfa fields and grassy field margins in South Hungary. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 31(3-4): 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheller, H.V., 1984. The role of ground beetles (Carabidae) as predators on early populations of cereal aphids in spring barley. Zeitschr. Angew. Entomol. 97: 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sopp, P.I., K.D. Sunderland and D.S. Coombes, 1987. Observation on the number of cereal aphids on the soil in relation to aphid density in winter wheat. Ann. Appl. Biol. 111: 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D.W. and J.R. Krebs, 1986. Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, K.D., 1975. The diet of some predatory arthropods in cereal crops. J. Appl. Ecol. 12: 507–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, K.D. and F. Samu, 2000. Effects of agricultural diversification on the abundance, distribution, and pest control potential of spiders: A review. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 95: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, K.D. and C.J. Topping, 1995. Estimating population densities of spiders in cereals. In: S. Toft and W. Riedel (eds), Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land I. Density, Spatial heterogeneity and Dispersal. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus. pp. 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, K.D., N.E. Crook, D.L. Stacey and B.J. Fuller, 1987. A study of feeding by polyphagous predators on cereal aphids using ELISA and gut dissection. J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 907–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, K.D.,A.M. Fraser and A.F.G.Dixon, 1986. Field and laboratory studies on money spiders (Linyphiidae) as predators of cereal aphids. J. Appl. Ecol. 23: 433–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, K.D., C.J. Topping, S. Ellis, S. Long, S. van de Laak and M. Else, 1996. Reproduction and survival of linyphiid spiders, with special reference to Lepthyphantes tenuis(Blackwall). In: C.J.H. Booij and L.J.M.F. den Nijs (eds), Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land II. Survival, Reproduction and Enhancement. Aarhus University Press, Århus. pp. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symondson, W.O.C., K.D. Sunderland and M.H. Greenstone, 2002. Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47: 561–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, O.F., 1996. The effects of day length, temperature and prey type on food consumption by Bembidion lamprosand Tachyporus hypnorum. Masters thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Aarhus, Denmark.

  • Todd, V., 1949. The habitats and ecology of the British harvestmen (Arachnida, Opiliones), with special reference to those of the Oxford district. J. Anim. Ecol. 18: 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft, S., 1989. Aspect of the ground-living spider fauna of two barley fields in Denmark: Species richness and phenological synchronization. Entomol. Medd. 57: 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft, S., 1995. Value of the aphid Rhopalosiphum padias food for cereal spiders. J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 552–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft, S., 1997. Acquired food aversion of a wolf spider to three cereal aphids: intra-and interspecific effects. Entomophaga 42: 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft, S., 2000. Species and age effects in the value of cereal aphids as food for a spider (Araneae). Ekòlogia (Bratislava) 19 (Suppl. 3): 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toft, S. and D.H. Wise, 1999. Growth, development, and survival of a generalist predator fed single-and mixed-species diets of different quality. Oecologia 119: 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toft, S., C. Vangsgaard and H. Goldschmidt, 1995. Distance methods used to estimate densities of web spiders in cereal fields. In: S. Toft and W. Riedel (eds), Arthropod Natural Enemies in Arable Land I. Density, Spatial Heterogeneity and Dispersal. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus. pp. 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldbauer, G.P. and S. Friedman, 1991. Self-selection of optimal diets by insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36: 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, H., P.A. Chiverton, B.S. Ekbom and A. Borg, 1992. Diet, fecundity and egg size in some polyphagous predatory carabid beetles. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 65: 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiktelius, S. and B.S. Ekbom, 1985. Aphids in spring sown cereals in central Sweden. J. Appl. Entomol. 100: 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiktelius, S., 1986. Distribution of R. padion spring barley plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 110: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Aarhus, Building 135, DK-8000, Århus C, Denmark

    Michael Madsen, Steen Terkildsen & Søren Toft

Authors
  1. Michael Madsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steen Terkildsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Søren Toft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Toft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madsen, M., Terkildsen, S. & Toft, S. Microcosm studies on control of aphids by generalist arthropod predators: Effects of alternative prey. BioControl 49, 483–504 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BICO.0000036442.70171.66

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BICO.0000036442.70171.66

  • aphid consumption
  • Araneae
  • Carabidae
  • microcosm
  • Opiliones
  • pest control
  • polyphagous arthropod predator
  • prey tolerance