Skip to main content
Log in

Liver-based artificial diets for the production of Orius laevigatus

  • Published:
BioControl Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different meat- and liver-based artificialdiets were designed for the generalist predatorOrius laevigatus (Fieber) (Anthocoridae)and their suitability was compared to that ofits factitious food, Ephestia kuehniellaZeller (Pyralidae) eggs. The quality of thefood was measured by its ability to promotegrowth and oviposition of the insect. Nymphaldevelopment was slower on artificial diets thanon the control food, taking 15.0–15.9 days vs.14.3 days, respectively. Survival of nymphs fedartificial diets varied from 68.0–92.5%,compared with 96% for those fed E. kuehniella eggs. Adult weights were, however,not affected by diet. Fecundity of femalesprovided with liver diets was similar to orsomewhat lower than that of females fed Ephestia eggs. Oviposition rate and egg hatchwere similar on all diets tested. The resultssuggest that beef liver was the most importantcomponent of the diets tested, offering theessential nutrients to sustain growth andreproduction of O. laevigatus.Supplementing ingredients, like ground beef,egg yolk, sucrose and vitamin C can improve thenutritional value of the diet for O.laevigatus, but effects are rather small.Artificial diets containing liver and egg yolkas the main components may prove useful to makemass production of O. laevigatus andother heteropteran predators more cost effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, T.S., 2000. Effect of diet and mating status on ovarian development in a predaceous stink bug, Perillus bioculatus(F.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93: 529–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • search.pl

  • Arijs,Y. and P. De Clercq, 2001. Rearing Orius laevigatuson cysts of the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana. Biol. Control 21: 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atallah, Y.H. and L.D. Newsom, 1966. Ecological and nutritional studies on Coleomegilla maculataDe Geer (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). I. The development of an artificial diet and a laboratory rearing technique. J. Econ. Entomol. 59: 1173–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R.J., S. Long and N.L. Helyer, 1993. Effectiveness of Orius laevigatus(Hem.: Anthocoridae) for the control of Frankliniella occidentalison cucumber and pepper in the U.K. Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 3: 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z.-H., E.-Y. Chen, and F.-S. Yan, 1980. Effects of diets on the feeding and reproduction of Coccinella septempunctata. Acta Entomol. Sinica 23: 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocuzza, G.E., P. De Clercq, M. Van de Veire, A. De Cock, D. Degheele and V. Vacante, 1997. Reproduction of Orius laevigatusand Orius albidipennison pollen and Ephestia kuehniellaeggs. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 82: 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.C., 1992. Using a systematic approach to develop artificial diets for predators. In: T. Anderson and N. Leppla (eds), Advances in Insect Rearing for Research and Pest Management. Westview Press, Boulder. pp. 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.C., 1985. Simple method for rearing the insect predator Geocoris punctipes(Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) on a meat diet. J. Econ. Entomol. 85: 720–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.C., 1995. Extra-oral digestion in predatory arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40: 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.C., 1998. Solid-to-liquid feeding: the inside(s) of extra-oral digestion in predaceous Arthropoda. Am. Entomol. 44: 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.C., 1999. Artificial media for rearing entomophages comprising cooked, whole egg. United States patent no. 5,834,177. http://patft.uspto.gov/

  • Cohen, A.C., 2000. Feeding fitness and quality of domesticated and feral predators: Effects of long-term rearing on artificial diets. Biol. Control 17: 50–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, P. and D. Degheele, 1992. A meat-based diet for rearing the predatory stinkbugs Podisus maculiventrisand Podisus sagitta(Het.: Pentatomidae). Entomophaga 37: 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, P. and D. Degheele, 1993a. Quality assessment of the predatory bugs Podisus maculiventris(Say) and Podisus sagitta(Fab.) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) after prolonged rearing on a meat-based artificial diet. Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 3: 133–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, P. and D. Degheele, 1993b. Quality of predatory bugs of the genus Podisus(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) reared on natural and artificial diets. In: G. Nicoli, M. Benuzzi and N.C. Leppla (eds), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop of the IOBC Global Working Group “Quality Control of Mass Reared Arthropods”. Rimini, Italy, pp. 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, P., F. Merlevede and L. Tirry, 1998. Unnatural prey and artificial diets for rearing Podisus maculiventris(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Biol. Control12: 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dissevelt, M., K. Altena and W.J. Ravensberg, 1995. Comparison of different Oriusspecies for control of Frankliniella occidentalisin glasshouse vegetable crops in the Netherlands. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent 60: 839–845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, S., J. Guillaud, B. Delobel and G. Bonnot, 1989. Nutrition etélevage du prédateur polyphage Macrolophus caliginosus(Heteroptera, Miridae) sur milieux artificiels. Entomophaga 35: 77–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattingh, V. and M.J. Samways, 1993. A forced change in prey type during field introductions of coccidophagous biocontrol agents Chilocorusspecies (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): Is it an important consideration in achieving establishment? In: L. Polgár, R.J. Chambers, A.F.G. Dixon and I. Hodek (eds), Behaviour and Impact of Aphidophaga. SPB Acad. Publ., The Hague. pp. 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, H.L., 1966. Effects of varying the ratio between the amino acids and the other nutrients in conjunction with a salt mixture on the fly Agria affinis(Fall.). J. Insect. Physiol. 12: 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, H.L., 1969. Effect of different proportions of nutrients on insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 12: 651–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, H.L., 1974. Nutrition. In: M. Rockstein (ed), The Physiology of Insecta, Vol. 5. Academic Press, New York. pp. 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iriarte, J. and C. Castañé, 2001. Artificial rearing of Dicyphus tamaninii(Heteroptera: Miridae) on a meat-based diet. Biol. Control 22: 98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kariluoto, K.T., 1980. Survival and fecundity of Adalia bipunctata(Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) and some other predatory insect species on an artificial diet and a natural prey. Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 46: 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kariluoto, K.T., E. Junnikkala and M. Markkula, 1976. Attemps at rearing Adalia bipunctataL. (Col., Coccinellidae) on different artificial diets. Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 42: 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Racioppi, J.V., R.L. Burton and R. Eikenbary, 1981. The effects of various oligidic synthetic diets on the growth of Hippodamia convergens. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 30: 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, M.G., J.A. Morales-Ramos and E.G. King, 2000. Two meridic diets for Perillus bioculatus(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae), a predator of Leptinotarsa decemlineata(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Biol. Control 17: 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, J.L.D., J.C. Zanuncio, E.F. Vilela, C.S. Sediyama and P. De Clercq, 1995. Development of Podisus nigrispinus(Dallas) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on meat-based artificial diets. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Univ. Gent 60: 683–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Specty, O., G. Febvay, S. Grenier, B. Delobel, C. Piotte, J.-F. Pageaux, A. Ferran and J. Guillaud, 2003. Nutritional plasticity of the predatory ladybeetle Harmonia axyridis(Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): comparison between natural and substitution prey. Archiv. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 52: 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS, 1998.SPSS for Windows, release 9.0.0. User's guide. SPSS, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szumkowski, W., 1952. Observations on Coccinellidae. II. Experimental rearing of Coleomegillaon a non-insect diet. Trans. Ninth Int. Congr. Ent. 1: 781–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Veire, M., 1995. Integrated pest management in glasshouse tomatoes, sweet peppers and cucumbers in Belgium. Ph.D. Thesis, Ghent University. 133 pp.

  • Vanthournout, L., 2002. Ontwikkeling en reproductie van Orius laevigatus(Fieber) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) op kunstmatige voedingsbodems. M.Sc. Thesis, Ghent University. 139 pp.

  • Warren, L.O. and M. Tadic, 1967. Biological observations on Coleomegilla maculataand its role as a predator of the fall webworm. J. Econ. Entomol. 60: 1492–1496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmeyer J.L. and T.A. Coudron, 2001. Life table parameters, reproductive rate, intrinsic rate of increase, and estimated cost of rearing Podisus maculiventris(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on an artificial diet. J. Econ. Entomol. 94: 1344–1352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, J.H., L.A. Stauffer and K.A. Gallagher, 2001. Materials for rearing insects, mites, and other beneficial organisms. United States patent no. 6,291,007. http://patft.uspto.gov

  • Zanuncio, J.C., J.L.D. Saavedra, H.N. Oliveira, D. Degheele and P. De Clercq (1996). Development of the predatory stinkbug Brontocoris tabidus(Signoret) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on different proportions of an artificial diet and pupae of Tenebrio molitorL. (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Biocontr. Sci. Technol. 6: 619–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Arijs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arijs, Y., De Clercq, P. Liver-based artificial diets for the production of Orius laevigatus . BioControl 49, 505–516 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BICO.0000036440.02590.fa

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BICO.0000036440.02590.fa

Navigation