Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Genetic and Environmental Sources of Covariance Between Reading Tests Used in Neuropsychological Assessment and IQ Subtests

  • Published:
Behavior Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we examined genetic and environmental influences on covariation among two reading tests used in neuropsychological assessment (Cambridge Contextual Reading Test [CCRT], [Beardsall, L., and Huppert, F. A. (1994). J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 16:232–242], Schonell Graded Word Reading Test [SGWRT], [Schonell, F. J., and Schonell, P. E. (1960). Diagnostic and attainment testing. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.]) and among a selection of IQ subtests from the Multidimensional Aptitude Battery (MAB), [Jackson, D. N. (1984). Multidimensional aptitude battery, Ontario: Research Psychologists Press.] and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R) [Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation]. Participants were 225 monozygotic and 275 dizygotic twin pairs aged from 15 years to 18 years (mean, 16 years). For Verbal IQ subtests, phenotypic correlations with the reading tests ranged from 0.44 to 0.65. For Performance IQ subtests, phenotypic correlations with the reading tests ranged from 0.23 to 0.34. Results of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) supported a model with one genetic General factor and three genetic group factors (Verbal, Performance, Reading). Reading performance was influenced by the genetic General factor (accounting for 13% and 20% of the variance for the CCRT and SGWRT, respectively), the genetic Verbal factor (explaining 17% and 19% of variance for the CCRT and SGWRT), and the genetic Reading factor (explaining 21% of the variance for both the CCRT and SGWRT). A common environment factor accounted for 25% and 14% of the CCRT and SGWRT variance, respectively. Genetic influences accounted for more than half of the phenotypic covariance between the reading tests and each of the IQ subtests. The heritabilities of the CCRT and SGWRT were 0.54 and 0.65, respectively. Observable covariance between reading assessments used by neuropsychologists to estimate IQ and IQ subtests appears to be largely due to genetic effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alarcón, M., and DeFries, J. C. (1997). Reading performance and general cognitive ability in twins with reading difficulties and control pairs. Personality and Individual Differences 22:793-803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsall, L. (1998). Development of the Cambridge Contextual Reading Test for improving the estimation of premorbid verbal intelligence in older persons with dementia. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 37:229-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsall, L., and Huppert, F. A. (1994). Improvement in NART word reading in demented and normal older persons using the Cambridge Contextual Reading Test. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 16:232-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A., Fulker, D. W., and DeFries, J. C. (1990). Reading performance and general cognitive ability: a multivariate genetic analysis of twin data. Personality and Individual Differences 11:141-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, L. R., DiLalla, L. F., Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., and Fulker, D. W. (1990). Genetic correlations between reading performance and IQ in the Colorado Adoption Project. Intelligence 14:245-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, A., Datta, H., Gayan, J., and Olson, R. K. (1999). Varieties of developmental reading disorder: genetic and environmental influences. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 72:73-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. R., Parker, D. M., Stewart, L. E., Besson, J. A. O., and DeLacey, G. (1989). Prediction of WAIS IQ with the National Adult Reading Test: cross-validation and extension. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 28:267-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. R., Stewart, L. E., Cochrane, R., Parker, D. M., and Besson, J. A. O. (1989). Construct validity of the National Adult Reading Test: a factor analytic study. Personality and Individual Differences 10:585-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaves, L. J., Heath, A. C., and Martin, N. G. (1984). A note on the generalized effects of assortative mating. Behav. Genet. 14:371-376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, M. D., Burgess, E. J., and Smith-Seemiller, L. (1997). Methods of estimating premorbid functioning. Arch. Clin. Psychol. 12:711-738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayan, J., Datta, H. E., Castles, A., and Olson, R. K. (1997). The etiology of group deficits in word decoding across levels of decoding and orthographic coding. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Chicago, 23 March 1997.

  • Grayson, D. A. (1988). Twins reared together: minimizing shared environmental effects. Behav. Genet. 19:593-604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, S. L., Rivera-Mindt, M., Rankin, E. J., Ritchie, A. J., and Scott, J. G. (2001). Estimating premorbid intelligence: comparison of traditional and contemporary methods across the intelligence continuum. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 17:497-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, J-E., and Balke, G. (1993). General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement. Multivariate Behavioural Research 28:407-434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopper, J. L. (2000). Why 'common environmental effects' are so uncommon in the literature. In T. D. Spector, H. Sneider, and A. J. MacGregor (Eds.), Advances in twin and sib-pair analysis, London: Greenwich Medical Media, pp. 151-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. N. (1984). Multidimensional Aptitude Battery: Manual. Ontario, Canada: Research Psychologists Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: the science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R., and Weng, L-J. (1994). What is a good g. Intelligence 18:231-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, A. S., and Lichtenberger, E. O. (1999). Essentials of WAIS-III assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lastine-Sobecks, J. L., Jackson, S. T., and Paolo, A. M. (1998). Identifying the pronunciation of irregularly spelled words: relation to verbal IQ. Clin. Neuropsychol. 12:189-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, M. (2002). An information processing approach to the genetic study of psychometric intelligence: Links between processing speed, working memory and IQ. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, M., Wright, M. J., Smith, G. A., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B., and Martin, N. G. (2001). Genetic covariance among measures of information processing speed, working memory and IQ. Behav. Genet. 31:581-592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, M., Wright, M. J., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B., Smith, G. A., and Martin, N. G. (2003). A genetic two-factor model of the covariation among a subset of Multidimensional Aptitude Battery and WAIS-R subtests. Intelligence 31:589-605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. E. (1982). National Adult Reading Test. Berkshire: NFERNelson Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., and Wise, B. (1994). Genes, environment and the development of orthographic skill. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: theoretical and developmental issues. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J., and Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: genetic and environmental influences. J. Learn. Disabil. 22:339-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrill, S. A. (1997). Molarity versus modularity of cognitive functioning? A behavioral genetic perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science 6:96-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrill, S. A., Luo, D., Thompson, L. A., and Detterman, D. K. (1996). The independent prediction of general intelligence by elementary cognitive tasks: genetic and environmental influences. Behav. Genet. 26:135-147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., and Craig, I. (2001). Genetics, environment and cognitive abilities: review and work in progress towards a genome scan for quantitative trait locus associations using DNA pooling. Br. J. Psychiatry 178(Suppl. 40):s41-s48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijsdijk, F. V., Vernon, P. A., and Boomsma, D. (1998). The genetic basis of the relation between speed-of-information processing and IQ. Behav. Brain Res. 95:77-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijsdijk, F. V., Vernon, P. A., and Boomsma, D. (2002). Application of hierarchical genetic models to Raven and WAIS subtests: a Dutch twin study. Behav. Genet. 32:199-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonell, F. J., and Schonell, P. E. (1960). Diagnostic and attainment testing. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. (1991). Which aspects of processing text mediate genetic effects. In B. F. Pennington (Ed.), Reading disabilities: genetic and neurological influences. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 31-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd Ed.), New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. A. (2000). Recent studies of intelligence and personality using Jackson's Multidimensional Aptitude Battery and Personality Research Form. In R. D. Goffin and E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 195-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, S. J., DeFries, J. C., Fulker, D. W., and Plomin, R. (1994). Covariation among measures of cognitive ability and academic achievement in the Colorado adoption project: sibling analysis. Personality and Individual Differences 18:63-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised (WAIS-R). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia

    Mark Wainwright, Margaret J. Wright, Michelle Luciano & Nicholas G. Martin

  2. Cognitive Neuropsychology Laboratory, School of Psychology and Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Mark Wainwright, Gina M. Geffen & Laurie B. Geffen

Authors
  1. Mark Wainwright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margaret J. Wright
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gina M. Geffen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laurie B. Geffen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michelle Luciano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nicholas G. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wainwright, M., Wright, M.J., Geffen, G.M. et al. Genetic and Environmental Sources of Covariance Between Reading Tests Used in Neuropsychological Assessment and IQ Subtests. Behav Genet 34, 365–376 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEGE.0000023642.34853.cb

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEGE.0000023642.34853.cb

Search

Navigation