Abstract
In the last ten years, Russia and other countries have been showing a great deal of interest in two-section blanket reactors with unilateral neutron coupling of the sections (cascade-type blankets). These setups are intended to operate in power and transmutation electronuclear facilities, for which they permit decreasing substantially the required power of the proton accelerator. Theoretical and design works have been done on cascade-type blankets, but until very recently there were no experimental works.
The results of the first experiment of this type, performed at the All-Russia Scientific-Research Institute of Experimental Physics, on compact deeply subcritical uranium–neptunium assemblies are presented. The experiment has confirmed the theoretical conclusion that cascade blankets have positive properties and 237Np is effective as a means for achieving unilateral coupling of the sections.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
V. F. Kolesov and A. A. Malinkin, “Kinetics of a two-section booster reactor with asymmetric neutron coupling of the sections,” Vopr. At. Nauk. Tekh., Ser. Fiz. Yad. Reakt., No. 4, 10–23 (1991).
V. F. Kolesov and A. A. Malinkin, “Neutron multiplier with two cascades,” Inventor's Certificate No. 786619; Byull. Izobr., No. 30, 240 (1991) (priority date July 17, 1979).
V. F. Kolesov and B. Ya. Guzhovskii, “On the possibility of increasing the efficiency of an electronuclear setup by switching to a multisectional blanket structure,” At. Énerg., 76, No.1, 71–77 (1994).
V. F. Kolesov, S. K. Shtarev, V. Kh. Khoruzhii, and A. K. Zhitnik, “Efficiency of an electronuclear transmutation setup with a blanket based on fused salts and a neptunium multiplying target,” At. Énerg., 79, No.1, 40–45 (1995).
P. N. Alekseev, V. V. Ignat'ev, O. E. Kolyaskin, et al., “Enhanced-safety cascade subcritical reactor,” ibid., No. 5, pp. 327–337.
A. S. Gerasimov and G. V. Kiselev, “Scientific and technical problems of developing electronuclear setups for transmutation of long-lived radioactive wastes and simultaneous production of energy (Russian experience),” Fiz. Élement. Chast. At. Yad., 32, No.1, 143–188 (2001).
A. P. Barzilov, A. V. Gulevich, O. F. Kukharchuk, et al., “Subcritical nuclear system with cascade multiplication of neutrons,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Yad. Énerg., No. 2, 59–66 (1997).
A. M. Voinov, M. A. Voinov, S. V. Vorontsov, et al., “Computational-theoretical and design work on a physical mockup of a two-cascade blanket for an electronuclear reactor,” in: 2nd Scientific Seminar in Memory of V. P. Sarantsev, Dubna, September 2–24, 1997, D–9–153 (1998), pp. 69–76.
P. Griffin, J. Miller, G. Harms, et al., “Design trade-off study for a large volume short pulse neutron assembly,” in: Procedings of an International Topical Meeting on the Physics, Safety, and Applications of Pulse Reactors, Washington, D. C., November 1–17, 1994, pp. 292–299.
V. S. Barashenkov and I. A. Shelaev, “Electronuclear energy amplifiers with low-energy proton beams,” At. Énerg., 85, No.5, 409–411 (1998).
S. A. Bznuni, V. M. Zhamkochyan, A. G. Khudaverdyan, et al., “Cascade electronuclear systems with a liquid-cadmium valve,” At. Énerg., 94, No.3, 214–220 (2003).
R. Avery, K. Brenian, J. Branson, et al., “Critical experiment with a coupled-type power reactor-multiplier operating on thermal and fast neutrons,” in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, Geneva (1958); Selected Reports of Foreign Scientists, Vol. 3, The Physics of Nuclear Reactors, Moscow (1959), pp. 23–258.
A. V. Gulevich, A. V. Zrodnikov, O. F. Kukharchuk, et al., “Calculation of the spatiotemporal nonuniformities of the neutron field in numerical simulation of experiments on the UKS-1M critical stand,” in: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Nuclear-Excited Plasma and the Problems of Nuclear-Pumped Lasers, May 2–29, 1992, Obninsk (1993), Vol. 2, pp. 13–22.
P. P. D'yachenko, O. A. Elovskii, Yu. A. Prokhorov, et al., “Stand-B reactor-laser complex,” At. Énerg., 88, No.5, 337–342 (2000).
N. V. Zavialov, V. F. Kolesov, and Yu. A. Khokhlov, “On the possibility of experimental testing for the conception of cascade electronuclear facilities using 237Np,” in: Nuclear Fission and Fission-Product Spectroscopy: 2nd International Workshop, Seyssins, France, April 1998, American Institute of Physics (1998), pp. 61–66.
V. F. Kolesov, N. V. Zav'yalov, I. A. Ivanin, et al., “Experimental study of models of a cascade blanket of an electronuclear setup,” At. Énerg., 92, No.1, 42–50 (2002).
V. F. Kolesov and V. Kh. Khoruzhii, “Neutron characteristics of models of a cascade two-section blanket,” At. Énerg., 88, No.5, 330–337 (2000).
Yu. K. Kochubei, A. K. Zhitnik, E. V. Artem'eva, et al., “S-95 program. Monte Carlo simulation of simultaneous neutron and γ-ray transfer,” Vopr. At. Nauk. Tekh., Ser. Mat. Mod. Fiz. Prots., No. 2, 49–52 (2000).
M. I. Kuvshinov, S. V. Vorontsov, V. P. Gorelov, et al., “Test critical experiments on the FKBN-2M setup,” Vopr. At. Nauk. Tekh., Ser. Fiz. Yad. Reakt., Nos. –3, 142–149 (2000).
S. A. Duranni and R. K. Bull, Solid State Nuclear Track Detectors [Russian translation], Énergoatomizdat, Moscow (1990).
V. D. Sevast'yanov, A. S. Koshelev, G. N. Maslov, et al., “Standard neutron field at the center of a BIR-2 reactor core,” At. Énerg., 76, No.1, 55–61 (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zav'yalov, N.V., Kolesov, V.F., Kuvshinov, M.I. et al. Experimental Confirmation of the Concept of Two-Section Cascade-Type Blankets. Atomic Energy 95, 820–828 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ATEN.0000018994.91616.a2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ATEN.0000018994.91616.a2