Abstract
The present-day large increase of the amount of data relevant to cosmology, as well as their increasing accuracy, leads to the idea that the determination of cosmological parameters has been achieved with a rather good precision, may be of the order of 10%. There is a large consensus around the so-called concordance model. Indeed this model does fit an impressive set of independent data, the most impressives been: CMB Cl curve, most current matter density estimations, Hubble constant estimation from HST, apparent acceleration of the Universe, good matching of the power spectrum of matter fluctuations. However, the necessary introduction of a non zero cosmological constant is an extraordinary new mystery for physics, or more exactly the come back of one of the ghost of modern physics since its introduction by Einstein. Here, I would like to emphasize that some results are established beyond reasonable doubt, like the (nearly) flatness of the universe and the existence of a dark non-baryonic component of the Universe. But also that the evidence for a positive cosmological constant may not be as strong as needed for its existence to be considered as established beyond doubt. In this respect, I will argue that an Einstein-De Sitter universe might still be a viable option. Some observations do not fit the concordance picture. I discuss several of the claimed observational evidences supporting the concordance model and will focus more specifically on the observational properties of clusters which offer powerful constraints on various quantities of cosmological interest. They are particularly interesting in constraining the cosmological density parameter, nicely complementing the CMB result, which by its own does not request a non vanishing cosmological constant, contrary to what is sometimes claimed. Early, local, estimations based on the M/L ratio are now superseded by new tests that have been proposed during the last ten years which are globalin nature. Here, I will briefly discuss three of them: 1) the evolution of the abundance of clusters with redshift 2) the baryon fraction measured in local clusters 3) apparent evolution of the baryon fraction with redshift. I will show that these three independent tests lead to high matter density for the Universe in the range 0.6 — 1. I therefore conclude that the dominance of vacuum to the various density contributions to the Universeis presently a fascinating possibility, but it is still premature to consider it as an established scientific fact.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnaud, M. et al.: 2002, astro-ph/0204306, A&A 390, 27.
Arp, H.: 2002, ApJ 571, 615.
Barbosa D. et al.: 1996, A&A 314, 13.
Barriga, J. et al.: 2001, MNRAS 324, 977.
Bartlett, J. et al.: 2001, astro-ph/0106098.
Benoît et al.: 2002a, astro-ph/0210305, A&A in press.
Benoît et al.: 2002b, astro-ph/0210306, A&A in press.
Blanchard, A. et al.: 2000, A&A 362, 807.
Boughn, S.P., Crittenden, R.G. and Koehrsen, G.P.: 2002, ApJ 580, 672.
Carlberg, R.G. et al.: 1997, ApJ 479, L19.
Carlstrom, J.E., Holder, G.P. and Reese, E.D.: 2002, ARA&A 40, 463.
Daly, R.A.: 2002, astro-ph/0212107.
de Bernardis, P. et al.: 2000, Nature 404, 955.
Donahue, M.: 1996, ApJ 468, 79.
Donahue, M. et al.: 2000, ApJ 527, 525.
Douspis, M. et al.: 2001, A&A 379, 1.
Durrer, R., Kuntz, M. and Melchiorri, A.: 2002, Phys. Rept. 364, 1.
Eke, V.R. et al.: 1998, MNRAS 298, 1145.
Evrard, A.E.: 1989, ApJ 341, L71.
Evrard, A.E.: 1997, MNRAS 292, 289.
Evrard, A.E, Metzler, C.A. and Navarro, J.F.: 1996, ApJ 469, 494.
Frenk, C.S. et al.: 1999, ApJ 525, 554.
Fukugita, M., Hogan, C.J. and Peebles, P.J.E.: 1998, ApJ 503, 518.
Girardi, M. et al.: 1998, ApJ 506, 45.
Guth, A.: 1981, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347.
Halverson, N.W. et al.: 2002, ApJ 568, 38.
Hanany, S. et al.: 2000, ApJ 545, L5.
Hancock, S., Rocha, G., Lasenby, A.N. and Gutierrez, C.M.: 1998, MNRAS 294, L1.
Henry, J.P. and Arnaud, K.A.: 1991, ApJ 372, 410.
Henry, J.P.: 1997, ApJ 489, L1.
Henry, J.P.: 2000, ApJ 534, 565.
Kochanek, C.S.: 1996, ApJ 466, 638.
Kochanek, C.S.: 2002, ApJ 583, 49.
Le Dour, M. et al.: 2000, A&A 364, 369.
Lemaître, G.: 1933, Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A53, 51P.
Lesgourgues, J. and Liddle, A.R.: 2001, MNRAS 327 1307.
Lineweaver, C. et al.: 1997, A&A 322, 365.
Lineweaver, C. and Barbosa, D.: 1998, ApJ 496, 624.
Maoz et al.: 1993, ApJ 409, 28.
Markevitch, M.: 1998, ApJ 503, 77.
Mathiesen, B., Evrard, A.E. Mohr, J.J.: 1999, ApJ 520, L21.
Mészáros, A.: 2002, ApJ 580, 12.
Mushotsky, R.F. and Sharf, C.A.: 1997, ApJ 482, L13.
Netterfield, C.B. et al.: 1995, ApJ 445, L69.
Neumann, D. and Arnaud, M.: 2001, A&A 373, L33.
O'Meara, J.M. et al.: 2001, ApJ 552, 718.
Oukbir, J. and Blanchard, A.: 1992, A&A 262, L21.
Oukbir, J. and Blanchard, A.: 1997, A&A 317, 10.
Peebles, P.J.E., Daly, R.A. and Juszkiewicz, R.: 1989, ApJ 347, 563.
Pen, U.: 1997, New astron. 2, 309.
Perlmutter, S. et al.: 1997, ApJ 483, 565.
Perlmutter, S. et al.: 1999, ApJ 517, 565.
Persic, M. and Salucci, P.: 1992, MNRAS 258, 14.
Reichart, D.E. et al.: 1999, ApJ 518, 521.
Reiprich, T.H. and Böhringer, H.: 2002, ApJ 567, 716.
Reiss, D. et al.: 1998 AJ 116, 1009.
Roussel, H., Sadat, R. and Blanchard, A.: 2000, A&A 361, 429.
Rowan-Robinson, M.: 2002, MNRAS 332, 352.
Sachs, R.K. and Wolfe, A.M.: 1967, ApJ 147, 73.
Sadat, R., Blanchard, A. and Oukbir, J.: 1998, A&A 329, 21.
Sadat, R. and Blanchard, A.: 2001, A&A 371, 19.
Sarkar, S.: 2002, hep-ph/0201140, Plenary talk at EPS-HEP 2001.
Sasaki, S.: 1996, PASJ 48, L119.
Van Waerbeke, L. et al.: 2002, astro-ph/0202503, A&A, in press.
Viana, P.T.R. and Liddle, A.R.: 1999, MNRAS 303, 535.
Vikhlinin, A., Forman, W. and Jones, C.: 1999, ApJ 525, 47.
White, S.D.M., Navarro, J.F. and Evrard, A.E.: 1993, Nature 366, 429.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blanchard, A. Cosmological Parameters: Where are we?. Astrophysics and Space Science 290, 135–148 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASTR.0000022169.31100.a4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASTR.0000022169.31100.a4