Skip to main content
Log in

Book Review: Studs, Tools, and the Family Jewels: Metaphors Men Live By. By Peter F. Murphy. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 2001, 167 pp., $19.95

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 December 2004

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Carnes, P. (1983). Out of the shadows: Understanding sexual addiction. Minneapolis, MN: CompCare Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. (1990). The obsessive-compulsive model for describing compulsive sexual behavior. American Journal of Preventive Psychiatry and Neurology, 2, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Scherer, C., & Mathy, R. M. (2001). Overcoming method-ological concerns in the investigation of online sexual activities. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 4, 437–447.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A., Scherer, C. R., Boies, S. C., & Gordon, B. (1999). Sexuality on the Internet: From sexual exploration to pathological expression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 154–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, S. N., & Heffner, C. L. (1998). Sexual addiction: Many conceptions, minimal data. Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 367–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A. (1999). Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers,31, 433–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, M. P. (1997). Hypersexual desire in males: An operational definition and clinical implications for males with paraphilias and paraphilia-related disorders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 505–526.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mustanski, B. S. (2001). Getting wired: Exploiting the Internet for the collection of valid sexuality data. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 292–301.

    Google Scholar 

REFERENCES

  • Bly, R. (1991). Iron John. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., & Parker, R. G. (1995). Conceiving sexuality. In R. G. Parker & J. H. Gagnon (Eds.), Conceiving sexuality: Approaches. to sex research in a postmodern world (pp. 3–16). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levant, R. F., & Pollack, W. S. (1995). A new psychology of men. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac An Ghaill, M. (1994). The making of men: Masculinities, sexual-ities, and schooling. Buckingham, Great Britain: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnarch, D. M. (1991). Constructing the sexual crucible. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000044939.86474.43

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Philaretou, A.G. Book Review: Studs, Tools, and the Family Jewels: Metaphors Men Live By. By Peter F. Murphy. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, 2001, 167 pp., $19.95. Arch Sex Behav 33, 520–522 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037584.05314.1b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037584.05314.1b

Navigation