Skip to main content
Log in

Is Human Ovulation Concealed? Evidence from Conception Beliefs in a Hunter-Gatherer Society

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several researchers have suggested that ovulation may not be concealed in humans living under natural conditions with minimal hygiene. Because measuring coital frequency in such a population is problematic, I tested this proposition indirectly by asking Hadza hunter-gatherers of Tanzania when a woman can get pregnant. If people (1) know that pregnancy is caused by sex, and people (2) say that women conceive in the middle of the menstrual cycle, we might infer that people think women conceive in the middle of the cycle because most copulations occur then. If copulation peaks strongly around ovulation, it is not concealed. The Hadza know that pregnancy is caused by sex but most say conception occurs right after menstruation ends. Hadza conception beliefs therefore do not suggest that ovulation is more detectable in humans under more natural conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bancroft, J. (1989). Human sexuality and its problems. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blurton Jones, N. G., O'Connell, J. F., Hawkes, K., Kamuzora, C. L., & Smith, L. C. (1992). Demography of the Hadza, an increasing and high density population of savanna foragers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 89, 159–181.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burley, N. (1979). The evolution of concealed ovulation. American Naturalist, 114, 835–858.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate sexuality: Comparative studies of the prosimians, monkeys, apes, and human beings. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. S., & Beach, F. A. (1951). Patterns of sexual behavior. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. P., & Wolfe, L. D. (1983). Human female sexual cycles and the concealment of ovulation problem. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 6, 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedricks, C. A. (1994). Sexual behavior across the menstrual cycle: A biopsychological approach. Annual Review of Sex Research, 5, 122–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B., & Whitten, P. L. (1987). Patterning of sexual activity. In B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 370–384). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. H. (1971). Distribution of coitus within human intermen-struum. Journal of Biosocial Science, 3, 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, J. T., Scutt, D., Whitehouse, G. H., Leinster, S. J., & Walton, J. M. (1996). Asymmetry and the menstrual cycle in women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 129–143.

  • Manson, W. C. (1986). Sexual cyclicity and concealed ovulation. Journal of Human Evolution, 15, 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. W. (1999a). Male care and mating effort among Hadza foragers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 57–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. W. (1999b). Showoffs or providers? The parenting effort of Hadza men. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 391–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. W. (2003). A critical period for provisioning by Hadza men: Implications for pair bonding. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 217–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers. Human Nature 15(4).

  • Morris, N. M., & Udry, J. R. (1982). Epidemiological patterns of sexual behavior in the menstrual cycle. In R. C. Friedman (Ed.), Behavior and the menstrual cycle (pp. 129–154). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, K. E., & Paige, J. M. (1981). The politics of reproductive ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlowski, B. (1999). Loss of oestrus and concealed ovulation in human evolution: The case against the sexual selection hypothesis. Current Anthropology, 40, 257–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Bronstad, P. M. (2001). Female body odor is a potential cue to ovulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 268, 797–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. F. (1996). “Revealed” ovulation in humans? Journal of Human Evolution, 30, 483–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steklis, H. D., & Whiteman, C. H. (1988). Loss of estrus in human evolution: Too many answers, too few questions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 417–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, K., & McClintock, M. (1998). Regulation of ovulation by human pheromones. Nature, 392, 177–179.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strassman, B. I. (1996). Menstrual hut visits by Dogon women: A hor-monal test distinguishes deceit from honest signaling. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 304–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassman, B. I. (1999). Comments: Loss of oestrus and concealed ovulation in human evolution. Current Anthropology, 40, 268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. W. (1994). Dynamics of human reproduction: Biology, biometry, demography. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marlowe, F.W. Is Human Ovulation Concealed? Evidence from Conception Beliefs in a Hunter-Gatherer Society. Arch Sex Behav 33, 427–432 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037423.84026.1f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000037423.84026.1f

Navigation