Advertisement

Aquaculture International

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 259–279 | Cite as

A marketing survey on Greek consumers' attitudes towards fish

  • I.S. Arvanitoyannis
  • A. Krystallis
  • P. Panagiotaki
  • A.J. Theodorou
Article

Abstract

The commercial fish industry in Greece traditionally represents one of the most important natural resource-based industries. The process by which the wide variety of seafood products moves from the deck of a trawler, or the fish farm, to the consumer's dish is rather complicated. Considering the various species marketed, the seasonal nature of the many domestic and foreign supplies, the specific quality and safety attributes, and a multitude of processing methods and products, the effective marketing of seafood products becomes very demanding. The present survey evaluates the Greek consumers' attitude towards wild and farmed fish in order to understand and satisfy market needs. The results of this study mainly indicate that fish consumption pattern is age-dependent. In addition, four consumer clusters are identified, with clear-cut socio-demographic profiles.

Aquaculture Cluster analysis Consumer behaviour Farmed fish Greece Principal component analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams C. 1998. Selected factors affecting seafood markets in the United States. J. Food Distribution Res. 29(1): 8-17.Google Scholar
  2. Arvanitoyannis I.S., Krystallis A. and Kapirti A. Health and environmental consciousness: Greek consumers' attitudes towards the organic, HACCP and ISO14000 certifications on food. Int. J. Food Agribusiness Marketing 15, in-pressGoogle Scholar
  3. Batzios C., Angelidis P., Moutopoulos D.K., Anastasiadou C. and Chisopolitou B. 2002. An investigation for cultivated fish consumption in Greece. Fishing News 255: 110-111 (in Greek).Google Scholar
  4. Batzios C., Tsakiridou E., Polymeros K. and Moutopoulos D. 2003. Consumers' willingness to purchase fish with quality certification label. Geotech. Sci. Issues 14: 40-47 (in Greek).Google Scholar
  5. Boischio A.A.P. and Henshel D. 2000. Fish consumption, fish lore, and mercury pollution-risk communication for the Madeira River People. Environ. Res. 84: 108-126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brummett R.E. 2000. Factors influencing fish prices in southern Malawi. Aquaculture 186: 243-251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burger J. 2000. Gender differences in meal patterns: role of self-caught fish and wild game in meat and fish diets. Environ. Res. 83: 140-149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burger J., Sanchez J. and Gochfelt M. 1998. Fishing, consumption, and risk perception in fisherfolk along an east coast estuary. Environ. Res. 77: 25-35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan H.M., Trifonopoulos M., Ing A., Receveur O. and Johnson E. 1999. Consumption of fresh water fish in Kahnawake: risks and benefits. Environ. Res. 80: S213-S222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatziefstathiou M., Kontos S. and Argyrou J. 2000. HACCP system implementation in aquaculture fish packaging units. Proc. 9th Pan-hellenic Conf. Ichthyologists Messologi, Greece, January, 2000, pp. 285-288 (in Greek).Google Scholar
  11. Cheng H. and Kezis A.S. 1997. Difference in foodservice seafood buyers impression of aquaculture product. J. Food Distribution Res. 27(1): 121-126.Google Scholar
  12. Engel J., Blackwell R.D. and Miniard P.W. 1995. Consumer Behaviour. The Dryden Press, NY.Google Scholar
  13. Falk C., Hanrahan L., Anderson H.A., Kanarek M.S., Draheim L., Needham L., Patterson D.J. and Great Lakes Consortium 1999. Body levels of dioxin, furans, and PCBs among frequent consumers of great lakes sport fish. Environ. Res. 80: S19-S25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Foxall G., Leek S. and Maddock S. 1998. Cognitive antecedents of consumers' willingness to purchase fish rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). Appetite 31: 391-402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Greek Ministry of Agriculture 2001. Report on fisheries general directorate of fisheries, State Publications, Athens (in Greek).Google Scholar
  16. Hanrahan L., Falk C., Anderson H.A., Draheim L., Kanarek M.S., Olson J. and Great Lakes Consortium 1999. Serum PCB and DDE levels of frequent great lakes sport fish consumers-a first look. Environ. Res. 80: S27-S37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Juhl H.J. and Poulsen C.S. 2000. Antecedents and effects of consumer involvement in fish as a product group. Appetite 34: 261-267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Karakassis I., Tsapakis M., Hatziyanni E., Papadopoulou K.N. and Plati W. 2000. Impact of cage farming of fish on the seabed in the Mediterranean coastal areas. J. Marine Sci. 57: 1462-1471.Google Scholar
  19. Kearney J.P., Cole D.C., Ferron L.A. and Weber J.-F. 1999. Blood PCB, p,p0-DDE and mirex levels on great lakes fish and waterfowl consumers in two Ontario communities. Environ. Res. 80: S138-S149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lazaridis P. 1999. Major food categories' demand structure description in Greece and projections for the Year 2010. In: Maraveyias N. (ed) Greek Agriculture Towards 2010. Agricultural University Publications, Athens (in Greek).Google Scholar
  21. Leek S., Maddock S. and Foxall G. 2000. Situational determinants of fish consumption. Br. Food J. 102(1): 18-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NSSG 2000. Official 1998 Data Series. National Statistical Service of Greece State Publication, Athens (in Greek).Google Scholar
  23. Olsen S.O. 2001. Consumer involvement in seafood as family meals in Norway: an application of the expectancy-value theory. Appetite 36: 173-186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Roininen K., Lahteenmaki L. and Tuorila H. 1999. Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of food. Appetite 33: 71-88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Roussi A. and Dimitriou E. 2000. Aquaculture in the area of Ehinades in Ionian sea and the attitude of the locals. Proc. 9th Pan-hellenic Conf. Ichthyologists. Messologi, Greece, January, 2000, pp. 307-310 (in Greek).Google Scholar
  26. Self-service Review 2002. Family Accounts Survey 1999. National Statistical Service of Greece Data (in Greek).Google Scholar
  27. Shatenstein B., Kosatsky T., Tapia M., Nadom S. and Leclerc B.-S. 1999. Exploratory assessment of fish consumption among asian-Origin Sportfishers on the St. Lawrence River in the Montreal region. Environ. Res. 80: S57-S70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sorensen E., Grunert K.G. and Nielsen N.A. 1996. The impact of product experience, product involvement and verbal processing style on consumers' cognitive structures with regard to fresh fish. Working Paper No. 42, MAPP, The Aarhus School of Business.Google Scholar
  29. Stathopoulos D. 2002. Fresh fish: an increase of super market' share is expected. Self-service Rev. 278: (November), 108-110 (in Greek).Google Scholar
  30. Tzouros N.E. and Arvanitoyannis I.S. 2000. Implementation of hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) system to the fish/seafood industry: a review. Food Rev. Int. 16(3): 273-325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zandstra E.H., de Graaf C. and van Staveren W.A. 2001. Influence of health and taste attitudes on consumption of low-and high-fat foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 12: 75-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • I.S. Arvanitoyannis
    • 1
  • A. Krystallis
    • 2
  • P. Panagiotaki
    • 3
  • A.J. Theodorou
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, School of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of ThessalyN. Ionia MagnisiasGreece
  2. 2.National Agricultural Research FoundationAthensGreece
  3. 3.Department of Agriculture, Animal Production and Aquatic Environment, School of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of ThessalyN. Ionia MagnisiasGreece

Personalised recommendations